Why did Malakhov leave Channel One? Why did Malakhov leave Channel One?
Work on Channel One proceeded as usual: smoothly and harmoniously, and there was no information that Malakhov was leaving for another place of work due to some kind of conflict. A few days later, Andrei Malakhov put forward a refutation of this rumor, talking in a short interview about why he is not going to leave anywhere and continues to work on Channel One as usual. That the channel is undergoing technical work and some changes, due to which his project temporarily stopped appearing on television screens.
At the same time, the TV presenter and Tina Kandelaki played a prank on the audience by spreading a rumor that Malakhov was going to become one of the commentators on the Match-TV channel. The result of joint efforts and a couple of comments under a clumsily edited photo resulted in waves of indignation from fans and expectations of “the worst.”
- What really happened
- Opinion of Andrey Malakhov
- Friends support
What really happened
In October 2017, the news that Malakhov was leaving Channel One, replacing it with Rossiya-1, was confirmed by both the TV presenter himself and his employers. Viewers received answers to their questions quite recently. An ambitious presenter with 25 years of experience was prompted to change jobs most interesting offer become a participant in a new project. Now he will be the face game show"Wall".
The unique program will reveal the fates of brilliant and ambitious people who, without the opportunity to earn big money, are building the future of their beloved country. Their stories will reveal the background to how small people doing small things improve the quality of our lives. Exactly like this interesting program was the reason for changing jobs.
Opinion of Andrey Malakhov
IN modern world There are no longer such barbaric methods as luring famous stars TV shows and programs with the help of promises of higher fees and increased bonuses. Ambitious presenters with big names independently choose the place where they feel comfortable working. That is why it is said that Malakhov, having decided to leave, encroached on something more profitable than on Channel One in financially offer is not possible.
He was simply tired of performing in the familiar and already boring role of a TV presenter who starred in the same type of programs and talk shows. Therefore, the offer to participate in a new project, in which he could develop as a person and explore what was really interesting to him, became the main criterion in choosing a new place of work.
Work in the “Let Them Talk” project in last years Malakhov regarded it as an auction in which the one who pays the most wins. To conduct a scandalous, shocking interview, he had to persuade people to take part in this show, purposefully dragging them into the thick of not always pleasant events. Celebrities had to be bribed different ways, which Malakhov absolutely did not like, because his character does not allow him to step over certain principles. But the show regularly required making deals with itself.
Now Andrei Malakhov does not need to sacrifice his precious time and go against his moral principles to create a unique and amazing show. It is enough for him to tell the truth, talking about people who, with their discoveries and inventions, make the world a better place, embodying their deepest dreams in it.
Friends support
Quite often it happens that a TV presenter who runs his project on one channel takes with him all the developments and command staff. Malakhov, choosing the show “The Wall,” did the same. But to convince others of the correctness decision taken it was not as simple as it seemed initially. After all, his team is accustomed to working at a certain, measured pace and mode in the “Let Them Talk” program. Not all employees wanted to change their place of work, and, accordingly, their lives. Innovations and changes are not liked by everyone and not always.
More for a long time everyone will be interested in the question of why Andrei Malakhov left the first channel and “Let them talk”, as versions will be built on this matter.
Andrei Malakhov's departure from Channel One was, to put it mildly, unexpected for most TV viewers. There are plenty of rumors and speculation about this fact, and it is unlikely that the true reason will become known to the Russians. However, many involuntarily breathed a sigh of relief. Malakhov was forced or he wished it himself, everything happened voluntarily and Andrei passed fatal fate Listyev and the question of why Malakhov left Channel One will not be reflected in the story with a fatal and sad connotation.
Version number one: format change
“Let Them Talk” programs have changed their format more than once. They came out with elements of the “Big Wash”, when the unexpected and sometimes improbable stories of the heroes received publicity. Viewers also remember the warm, almost family-like programs when they honored famous artists and singers. No less memorable broadcasts on the eve of big competitions and music competitions.
The heroes of the show were absolutely different people from the janitor to the crowned heads. Such a long reminder is not without reason. One of the versions of Andrei Malakhov’s departure from “Let Them Talk” is a change in the broadcast format. This statement seems somewhat strange. Because, as a presenter, Malakhov is a 100% professional, and this version clearly does not provide an answer to why Malakhov left Channel One. He knows how to find mutual language with artists, politicians, athletes, as well as with ordinary people from the outback. It’s hard to believe that he was beyond the control of the need to change his own image.
On the other hand, the version suits everyone quite well. Because to imagine that a conflict of unprecedented force has broken out on the First and Main TV Channel of the country is not just difficult, but even disgusting. Professionals with capital letters must find a common language and manage their emotions. Working in a large team requires this. Therefore, why Andrei Malakhov left Let them say this version is not clear.
Fuel to the fire from former guests of the program: is it really a scandal?
Marina Anisina and Nikita Dzhigurda came to help. This couple, where both stand for each other. It put millions of TV viewers in an uncomfortable position. After all, not much is not little, they took away their favorite (as the spouses themselves admit). Figure skater and champion, of course great personality, Marina Anisina reported that she filed a statement with the police not only against Andrei Malakhov, but also against the entire group that worked with him in 2015 in France, where the scandal broke out (about the essence of which it was not possible to find out details). However, it is not possible to shed light on this story. Since the newly created team also failed to reach an agreement and meet with the Dzhigurda-Anisin couple. The couple refuses to conduct a dialogue in the format proposed by the channel’s editors. Moreover, it is quite obvious that these are not questions of fees. This version answers the question of why Malakhov left Channel One even less convincingly.
Topic for future programs: how Malakhov became a nanny
Another original version of why Andrei Malakhov left Channel One and the program “Let Them Talk,” which even seems funny to viewers: Andrei decided to become a babysitter. It was suggested by Malakhov himself in one of his first interviews, where he half-jokingly indirectly confirmed his departure from Channel One. Of course, how could the public take seriously the statement of such a popular presenter that he was going on leave to care for a newborn child?
However, to the presenter himself, this would hardly seem funny. After all, maternity benefits in his situation are quite decent. At the same time, combining raising a child with occasional weddings and other celebrations is easily possible.
If this had turned out to be true, the case would have become unprecedented and set an example for other husbands in many directions at once. This means not only the touching union of child and father, but also the prospect of earning money for the wife, the opportunity to build her career. IN better times and if the topic had touched on another person, surely this person would have become the hero of “Let Them Talk.”
Counting other people's millions is not a rewarding, troublesome, and useless task. There are special services for this and it is worth leaving this privilege to them. But it should be noted that when asked why Malakhov left Channel One, there is a version that Malakhov left the program for a million (unspecified currency), and it also has the right to life.
New presenter and first try: is everything so smooth?
The personality of the sports newsman is already well known to the public. Although the intrigue about the name, as well as the fact that Andrei Malakhov left Channel One, persisted for a long time. There were rumors about Dmitry Shepelev appearing in the studio as a presenter. However, what was needed here was a person known and impeccable in the eyes of the whole country. Yes, Shepelev himself will forgive, the scandal with Zhanna Friske’s family was and is not in his favor.
Dmitry also supported the new presenter, but Borisov already came quite famous people countries. True, one does not yet feel the freedom of action that Malakhov possessed. Sharp questions, slight irony and manifestation of others human qualities, was not seen by viewers in the channel’s new programs.
This forces us to mentally return to the truth of Dzhigurda-Anisin’s version, although it is quite difficult to attribute tactfulness, arrogance or other qualities with a tinge of “yellowness” to Malakhov. However, Borisov’s constraint makes one think that “there is no smoke without fire” and the new presenter has already been warned about something.
TV viewers fell in love with “Five Evenings” so much, and then “Let Them Talk,” that its popularity has so far remained for quite some time. high level. It will probably remain that way, moving along the well-worn road with an inertial engine. The answer to the question - why A. Malakhov left Channel One and “Let Them Talk” will remain interesting for years and years to those who are fans of Andrei Malakhov’s work.
Ecuadorian authorities have denied Julian Assange asylum at the London embassy. The founder of WikiLeaks was detained by British police, and this has already been called the biggest betrayal in the history of Ecuador. Why are they taking revenge on Assange and what awaits him?
Australian programmer and journalist Julian Assange became widely known after the website WikiLeaks, which he founded, published secret documents from the US State Department in 2010, as well as materials related to military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But it was quite difficult to find out who the police, supporting by the arms, were leading out of the building. Assange had grown a beard and looked nothing like the energetic man he had previously appeared in photographs.
According to Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno, Assange was denied asylum due to his repeated violations of international conventions.
He is expected to remain in custody at a central London police station until he appears at Westminster Magistrates' Court.
Why is the President of Ecuador accused of treason?
Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa called the current government's decision the biggest betrayal in the country's history. “What he (Moreno - editor’s note) did is a crime that humanity will never forget,” Correa said.
London, on the contrary, thanked Moreno. The British Foreign Office believes that justice has triumphed. The representative of the Russian diplomatic department, Maria Zakharova, has a different opinion. “The hand of “democracy” is squeezing the throat of freedom,” she noted. The Kremlin expressed hope that the rights of the arrested person will be respected.
Ecuador sheltered Assange because ex-president held center-left views, criticized US policies and welcomed the WikiLeaks publication secret documents about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even before the Internet activist needed asylum, he managed to personally meet Correa: he interviewed him for the Russia Today channel.
However, in 2017, the government in Ecuador changed, and the country set a course for rapprochement with the United States. The new president called Assange “a stone in his shoe” and immediately made it clear that his stay on the embassy premises would not be prolonged.
According to Correa, the moment of truth came at the end of June last year, when US Vice President Michael Pence arrived in Ecuador for a visit. Then everything was decided. “You have no doubt: Lenin is simply a hypocrite. He has already agreed with the Americans on the fate of Assange. And now he is trying to make us swallow the pill, saying that Ecuador is supposedly continuing the dialogue,” Correa said in an interview with the Russia Today channel.
How Assange made new enemies
The day before the arrest Chief Editor WikiLeaks Kristin Hrafnsson said that Assange was under total surveillance. “WikiLeaks uncovered a large-scale spy operation against Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy,” he noted. According to him, cameras and voice recorders were placed around Assange, and the information received was transferred to the Donald Trump administration.
Hrafnsson clarified that Assange was going to be expelled from the embassy a week earlier. This did not happen only because WikiLeaks published this information. A high-ranking source told the portal about the plans of the Ecuadorian authorities, but the head of the Ecuadorian Foreign Ministry, Jose Valencia, denied the rumors.
Assange's expulsion was preceded by corruption scandal around Moreno. In February, WikiLeaks published a package of INA Papers, which traced the operations of the offshore company INA Investment, founded by the brother of the Ecuadorian leader. Quito said it was a conspiracy between Assange and Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and former Ecuadorian leader Rafael Correa to overthrow Moreno.
In early April, Moreno complained about Assange's behavior at Ecuador's London mission. “We must protect the life of Mr. Assange, but he has already crossed all boundaries in terms of violating the agreement that we came to with him,” the president said. “This does not mean that he cannot speak freely, but he cannot lie and hack.” ". At the same time, back in February last year it became known that Assange at the embassy was deprived of the opportunity to interact with outside world, in particular, his Internet access was cut off.
Why Sweden stopped its prosecution of Assange
At the end of last year, Western media, citing sources, reported that Assange would be charged in the United States. This was never officially confirmed, but it was because of Washington’s position that Assange had to take refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy six years ago.
In May 2017, Sweden stopped investigating two rape cases in which the portal’s founder was accused. Assange demanded compensation from the country's government for legal costs in the amount of 900 thousand euros.
Earlier, in 2015, Swedish prosecutors also dropped three charges against him due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
Where did the investigation into the rape case lead?
Assange arrived in Sweden in the summer of 2010, hoping to receive protection from American authorities. But he was investigated for rape. In November 2010, a warrant was issued for his arrest in Stockholm, and Assange was put on the international wanted list. He was detained in London, but was soon released on bail of 240 thousand pounds.
In February 2011, a British court decided to extradite Assange to Sweden, after which a number of successful appeals followed for the WikiLeaks founder.
British authorities placed him under house arrest before deciding whether to extradite him to Sweden. Breaking his promise to the authorities, Assange asked for asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy, which was granted to him. Since then, the UK has had its own claims against the WikiLeaks founder.
What awaits Assange now?
The man was re-arrested on a US extradition request for publishing classified documents, police said. At the same time, Deputy Head of the British Foreign Ministry Alan Duncan said that Assange would not be sent to the United States if he faced the death penalty there.
In the UK, Assange is likely to appear in court on the afternoon of April 11. This is stated on the WikiLeaks Twitter page. It is likely that the British authorities will seek maximum term imprisonment of 12 months, the man’s mother said, citing his lawyer.
At the same time, Swedish prosecutors are considering reopening the rape investigation. Attorney Elizabeth Massey Fritz, who represented the victim, will seek this.
Andrei Malakhov officially announced his departure from Channel One. Now viewers will be able to see their favorite TV presenter on the Rossiya channel.
Andrey Malakhov was born on January 11, 1972 in the city of Apatity, Murmansk region. The TV journalist’s father, Nikolai Dmitrievich, was a geophysicist; he studied the fossils of the Kola Island in Apatity. Mother - Lyudmila Nikolaevna - was a teacher in kindergarten, then the manager.
Why Malakhov left Let them talk 2017 from Channel One: the childhood years of the future TV presenter
Andrei studied very well at school and graduated with silver medal. While studying at school, he simultaneously received an education in music school violin class.
The future TV presenter in his small town I dreamed of becoming the host of the “Time” program, I wanted to be shown every evening. After all, in his hometown, television was considered something cool, reports Rosregistr. As Andrei Malakhov himself says, he could achieve success by developing in any direction, because he has a tremendous capacity for work and the ability to devote all his time to the process.
Why Malakhov left Let Them Talk 2017 from Channel One: studying in Moscow and first success on television
He came to Moscow to continue his education. Here Andrey graduated from the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University in 1995. M.V. Lomonosov, received a red diploma. Andrey was sent for an internship to the University of Michigan, USA, where he trained for a year and a half.
During his studies, he completed an internship in the cultural department of the Moscow News newspaper. After that he was an author and presenter on Radio Maximum. Hosted the “Style” program. In 1998, he began his studies at the Faculty of Law of the Russian State University for the Humanities, where he now teaches the basics of journalism.
Then Andrei Malakhov went to television, where he received simply dizzying success. He was the host of many of the most popular TV shows and was invited to the jury Major League KVN. Also removed New Year's program With People's Artist USSR Lyudmila Zykina - “Lyudmila Zykina: drinking songs from the main one.” There were also many other projects in which he successfully demonstrated his talent.
Why Malakhov left Let them talk 2017 from Channel One: transition to another TV channel and a new place of work
In 2017, it became known that Andrei Malakhov was leaving Channel One. He submitted his resignation to his management. As Andrei explained, this is explained by the fact that Andrei Malakhov, at 45 years old, is preparing to become a father for the first time. He, together with his wife, Natalya Shkuleva, made this decision and now the baby will spend the first days of his life with his mother and father.
Channel One producer Natalya Nikonova pushed him to this decision. She put Andrei before a choice - either he remains in the company, or leaves it to raise a child. The presenter decided to go to maternity leave.
Due to a conflict with the management, who wanted to add more political topics to Andrei Malakhov’s program, Andrei’s entire team left the channel following their presenter.
Andrei Malakhov announced his move to the Rossiya TV channel at the end of August. There he will not only play the role of presenter, but also act as a producer.
The “Let Them Talk” program, hosted by Andrei Malakhov on Channel One, won the TEFI television award. She was recognized as the best in the “Prime Time Entertainment Talk Show” category.
General Director of Channel One Konstantin Ernst announced that despite the fact that the channel’s presenter left them, the prize should go to him. Ernst, during the award ceremony, handed the statuette to the presenters of the program with a request to give the award to Andrei Malakhov.
Previously, the main version of the departure of a popular presenter from Channel One was his alleged conflict with CEO Konstantin Ernst. They said that Malakhov wants not only to host, but also to produce programs of which he is the host.
It's like in family life: at first there was love, then it grew into a habit, and at some point it was a marriage of convenience. My contract with Channel One ended on December 31, 2016 and was not renewed - everyone was so used to me being here. I want to grow, to become a producer, a person who makes decisions, including determining what my program should be about, and not giving up my whole life and looking like a puppy into the eyes of people changing during this time. The TV season ended, I decided that I needed to close this door and try myself in a new capacity in a new place.”
TV presenter Andrei Malakhov wrote an open letter to Konstantin Ernst and all employees of Channel One, in which he said goodbye to colleagues with whom he had worked for 25 long years.
“I have always been subservient. A human soldier following orders. “But I wanted independence,” said the “king of ratings.”
Well, in conclusion - about the owner of the main office of Ostankino, on the door of which there is a sign “10-01” attached. Dear Konstantin Lvovich! 45 years - important milestone in a man’s life, I gave 25 of them to you and Channel One. These years have become part of my DNA and I remember every minute you dedicated to me. Thanks a lot for everything you did, for the experience that you gave me, for amazing trip along the television road of life that we walked together.
Earlier, the media reported Malakhov’s departure from Channel One. The reason given was maternity leave due to the birth of the first child in the host’s family. Malakhov’s place in the talk show “Let Them Talk” was taken by Dmitry Borisov.
Why did Malakhov leave Channel 1? What is the reason? Summary for today.
Borisov admitted that it was a big shock for him that Malakhov decided to leave the project after for long years work. He was not the first to know about this. The new presenter also said that when he was offered to take the vacant seat, he could not imagine himself in the role of presenter. However, he decided that it was time to move on and perhaps he too would succeed, like his friend.
TV presenter Andrei Malakhov wrote an open letter to Konstantin Ernst and all employees of Channel One, in which he said goodbye to the colleagues with whom he had worked for 25 long years.
"It's a series various events in life. I came to Ostankino as a student for an internship and stood for three hours waiting for my pass. I was fascinated by it big world and started by running for coffee during the day and going to the stall for vodka for television legends at night. And although you have become popular TV presenter, you still work with the same people who treat you like the son of the regiment. This is a situation where your colleagues came much later, but already have their own projects. And you still have the same old status. You are expected to be the “talkie” presenter, but you already have something to talk about with your viewers.
Why Malakhov left channel 1 for channel 2. Hot news.
“In our digital era, the epistolary genre is extremely rarely addressed, but I came to Channel One in the last century, When people We also wrote letters to each other, not text messages. So forgive me for such a long message. I hope you know real reasons my unexpected transfer to "Russia 1", where I will lead new program"Andrei Malakhov. Live broadcast,” to work on the Saturday show and other projects,” the Starhit website quotes the text of the letter.
Malakhov sent an official statement of resignation to the management of the channel by Russian Post, since at that time he was not in Moscow. Alas, some people took this act of Andrei incorrectly.
On Friday, August 25, television viewers saw the “Live Broadcast” show for the first time, which is now hosted by Andrei Malakhov. The program caused conflicting feelings among our correspondents (details)
On August 21, Malakhov’s interview with Antenna was also published. In it, the presenter said that in 2017 he experienced a “crisis of the genre in absolutely everything” and was tired of being “a human soldier following orders.” He also stated that he wrote a letter of resignation from Channel One two months ago. Malakhov refused to answer the question about his conflict with the new producer of the “Let Them Talk” program.
And it would be okay if he just left quietly, but no - he went over to his competitors at “Russia” and will now host the talk show “Live” instead of Boris Korchevnikov. Previously, this program was losing heavily to “Let Them Talk” in the ratings. Although she was actually a clone. Now the producers are confident that everything will be the other way around.
Andrei Malakhov himself wished his friend success in his new job and assured him that he would cope. He also advised Borisov to get to work right away and not delay. This way the audience will get used to him and then it will be easier. Dmitry Borisov noted that despite many years of friendship they are now rivals. However, from friendly relations don't refuse. Now it will be difficult for them to have conversations about work since they are hosting the same shows but on different channels.
It all started with Malakhov, who hosted two super-rated projects on Channel One - “Let Them Talk” and “Tonight”. After the weekday prime time program came new producer, Andrey left her. As they say, there are several reasons: reluctance to make a political program instead of a social one, the desire to have greater creative freedom and a salary corresponding to his ambitions (they wrote that he received only 700 thousand rubles for hosting “Let Them Talk”).
Why Malakhov left the 1st video channel. Urgent news.
From the amazing past, I will also miss Kirill Kleimenov, who stands today at the helm of news broadcasting. We started together on the program “ Good morning" Kirill then read the morning news, and today he has a huge responsibility on his shoulders, he practically lives in the Television Center. Kirill, for me you are an example of self-denial in the name of your favorite cause, and there is the highest justice in the fact that the office with the most beautiful view It was you who got the opportunity to visit the ancient Ostankino Park. I also admire that you can easily communicate even on this the most difficult language like Finnish. When conjugating verbs in my “easy” French classes, I always think of you.
Official: Andrei Malakhov openly spoke about his new place of work and the “conflict” on Channel One
“Everything that is happening once again proves how fleeting everything is, how fast, fleeting and ephemeral everything is. Therefore, this is the story of the Garden of Eden..., - says Malakhov and convinces him that he will be as interested in the new place as before. - I was invited to famous already a brand. I feel like a designer who was invited to a famous fashion house, which must give new turn famous fashion brand, make sure that this brand is still worn large quantity of people".
TV presenter Andrei Malakhov confirmed that he left Channel One for “Russia 1” and will host a new program “Live” there. This was reported in the video announcement of the program, which was published in Malakhov’s column on the Starhit magazine website (the presenter is the editor-in-chief of the publication).
Larisa Krivtsova knows Andrey better than others: “He is a sincere and lively person. When did " Big Wash"he went to gym, began to swing, worked on his body, and we worked on his speech. But the main thing in a television project is the thought, what the presenter wants to say. Andrey is a good presenter, he has grown a lot during this time. Andryukh, you don’t chatter so much anymore... He sincerely sympathizes and worries about the heroes, so he became one of his own, coming to people’s houses every evening. People relate him to their relative, he discusses topics that concern them. They loved him because he was one of them."
I remember the day when I crossed the threshold of the Vremya program as an intern and saw big television from the inside for the first time. From that " ice age"Only 91-year-old Kaleria Kislova (former main director"Time" program. – Approx. "StarHit"). Kaleria Venediktovna, colleagues still talk about you with aspiration. People who could “build” will no longer be seen on TV? everyone - both presidents and top officials of the state. You are an example of the highest professionalism!
The presenter described his new program as “the same Malakhov in the frame that everyone is used to, just with more freedom of action.” The release dates for the “Live Broadcast” are not indicated in the materials.
And in an interview with his wife Natalya’s website wday.ru, he openly explained why he left Channel One. Andrei Malakhov admitted: after he turned 45, he realized that “it’s time to get out of the tight confines.”
Lenochka Malysheva, you were the person who was the first to call in excitement, refusing to believe what was happening. But you need to develop, you, as the producer of your own program, understand this better than others. And if at the same time I pushed you into new topic broadcast called “The first manifestations of male menopause” ;-), also not bad.
