The relationship between Oblomov and Stolz. The relationship between Oblomov and Stolz is the leading storyline in Goncharov's novel A friend is known in trouble of Oblomov and Stolz

The characters of the main characters in Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" are exceptionally true and talentedly portrayed by the author. If the artist's task is to snatch and capture the essence of life, inaccessible to the understanding of the layman, then the great Russian writer coped with it brilliantly. Its main character, for example, personifies a whole social phenomenon, named after him "Oblomovism". No less worthy of attention is the phenomenal friendship of Oblomov and Stolz, two antipodes who, it would seem, should have irreconcilably argued with each other or even despised each other, as often happens in the communication of completely different people. However, Goncharov goes against stereotypes, linking the antagonists with strong friendship. Throughout the novel, observing the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz is not only necessary, but also interesting to the reader. The clash of two life positions, two worldviews - this is the main conflict in Goncharov's novel Oblomov.

The differences between Oblomov and Stolz are not difficult to find. Firstly, the appearance is striking: Ilya Ilyich is a portly gentleman with soft features, puffy hands, and slow gestures. His favorite clothes are a spacious dressing gown that does not restrict movement, as if protecting and warming a person. Stolz - fit, slender. Constant activity and business acumen characterize his practical nature, so his gestures are bold, his reaction is quick. He is always dressed appropriately to move in the light and make the right impression.

Second, they have different upbringings. If little Ilyusha was cherished and cherished by parents, nannies and other inhabitants of Oblomovka (he grew up a pampered boy), then Andrei was brought up in strictness, his father taught him how to run a business, leaving him to make his own way. Stoltz, in the end, did not have enough parental affection, which he was looking for in his friend's house. Oblomov, on the contrary, was too affectionate, his parents spoiled him: he was not suitable either for the service or for the work of a landowner (taking care of the estate and its profitability).

Thirdly, their attitude to life differs. Ilya Ilyich does not like fuss, does not waste efforts to please society, or at least wedge into it. Many condemn him for laziness, but is it laziness? I think not: he is a nonconformist who is honest to himself and to the people around him. A nonconformist is a person who defends his right to behave differently from what is customary in his contemporary society. Oblomov had the courage and fortitude to silently, calmly adhere to his position and go his own way, not exchanging for trifles. In his manner of carrying himself, a rich spiritual life is guessed, which he does not put on a social showcase. Stolz lives in this window, because flickering in a good society always benefits the businessman. It can be said that Andrei had no other choice, because he is not a gentleman, his father earned capital, but no one will leave him villages by inheritance. He was taught from childhood that he himself should earn his living, so Stoltz adapted to the circumstances, developing hereditary qualities: perseverance, hard work, social activity. But if he is so successful by modern standards, why does Stoltz need Oblomov? From his father, he inherited obsession with business, the limitations of a practical person, which he felt, and therefore subconsciously reached out to the spiritually rich Oblomov.

They were drawn to the opposite, feeling the lack of certain properties of nature, but could not adopt each other's good qualities. None of them could make Olga Ilyinskaya happy: with one and the other, she felt dissatisfied. Unfortunately, this is the truth of life: people rarely change in the name of love. Oblomov tried, but still remained faithful to his principles. Stolz was also only enough for courtship, and after that the routine of living together began. Thus, in love, the similarities between Oblomov and Stolz manifested themselves: they both failed to build happiness.

In these two images, Goncharov reflected the conflicting trends in the society of that time. The nobility is the backbone of the state, but some of its representatives cannot take an active part in its fate, if only because it has gone and is petty for them. They are gradually being replaced by people who have gone through a harsh school of life, more skillful and greedy Stoltsy. They do not have that spiritual component that is needed for any useful work in Russia. But even the apathetic landowners will not save the situation. Apparently, the author believed that the merger of these extremes, some kind of golden mean, is the only way to achieve the well-being of Russia. If we consider the novel from this angle, it turns out that the friendship of Oblomov and Stolz is a symbol of the unification of various social forces for the sake of a common goal.

Article menu:

In childhood they lived almost nearby - in neighboring villages - then, already in their teens, They studied at a boarding school for noble children. Throughout their lives, fate brought these people together again and again. What are you talking about, you ask? Of course, about Ilya Oblomov and Andrey Stolz from Ivan Goncharov's novel Oblomov and their unusual friendship.

To understand the essence of the relationship of these diametrically opposed friends, you need to trace their life throughout the work.

The image of Oblomov: immersed in thought

In order to understand how opposite in character Andrei Stolz and Ilya Oblomov were, you must first follow the character of the first hero, whose last name is the whole novel. Ilya Ilyich appears to readers as a slovenly and extremely lazy middle-aged man. His favorite place is the sofa, and his dressing gown, which “had in the eyes of Oblomov a darkness of inestimable virtues: it is soft, flexible; the body does not feel it on itself; he, like an obedient slave, submits to the slightest movement of the body ... "
The careless decoration of the room, where, it would seem, order was observed, but a close look revealed a lot of external flaws, further emphasized the infantilism of the hero. He had neither a specific goal in life, nor any clear plans, looking at his surroundings absently and thoughtfully.

Active and purposeful Stolz

Andrei Stoltz was completely different. With youthful fervor, even in his youth, he explained the lessons to a slow and dreamy friend, sought to help Ilya find himself in life. But his aspirations were not justified, because the study “had a strange effect on Ilya Ilyich: he had a whole abyss between science and life, which he did not try to cross. His life was on its own, and science on its own.

Little Andryusha has been curious and very active since childhood. Any of his antics, up to the fact that the boy could leave for several days, while not causing concern to his father, were perceived by his parents without any panic. Without interfering with his son to freely explore the world around him, dad contributed to the development of a holistic, completely independent personality. Andrey Stolz is an amazing person, to whom you feel sympathy from the very first lines. The hero of the novel, loving life and striving for the future. This is how he is depicted on the pages of the work.

The reason for the friendship between Oblomov and Stolz

The reader, delving into the images of such completely opposite personalities, may have a fair question: how could they be friends? But, perhaps, some will be surprised to learn that at first Andrei and Ilya were similar in character. But it was the upbringing, the environment in which the young friends lived, that made them as different as the South and the North. However, close comrades perfectly cope with their dissimilarity and perfectly complement each other.

These two temperamentally different people were able to appreciate each other. Stolz sees in Oblomov his beautiful soul, and he, in turn, notices the best qualities of a true, devoted friend.

“... I knew many people with high qualities, but I have never met a purer, brighter and simpler heart; I loved many, but none so firmly and ardently as Oblomov. Having learned once, it is impossible to stop loving him ... ”- Andrey Ivanovich responds about Ilya Ilyich.

He loves a friend for his sincerity, considers him a very good person, even despite his impressiveness, apathy and laziness. Stolz hopes that someday it will be possible to remake Ilya Ilyich and is trying to take appropriate measures. But will he succeed?

Episodes from the novel: the friendship of Stolz and Oblomov

Throughout the whole novel, Oblomov and Stolz go hand in hand, maintaining sincere affection for each other. Consider some episodes from their lives.

Here Ilya and Andrey are small children. One of them is bold and active, the other is a little lazy, dreamy and timid. Parents love their children immensely, but they raise them in different ways. Therefore, their fates are completely different ...

Here Andrei, “often, breaking away from business or from the secular crowd, in the evening, from the ball, goes to sit on Oblomov’s wide sofa and, in a lazy conversation, take away and calm an anxious or tired soul.” In the presence of Oblomov, a friend calms down, feels like a person who has come "from magnificent halls under his own modest shelter."

Here they are conducting a dialogue among themselves, and Andrey cannot convince Ilya to become more alive, go out into society, break away from his comfortable sofa, change his way of thinking, leave passivity, apathy and laziness, become a full-fledged personality ... “Just like a lump of dough, curled up and you’re lying,” reproaches Stolz Oblomov, but he does not respond to the remarks. However, Andrei is adamant in his decision to change the situation. “No, I won’t leave you like this,” he resents. In a week you won't recognize yourself. Already in the evening I will give you a detailed plan of what I intend to do with myself and with you, and now get dressed ... "

Clever Stolz, behind the veil of indifference and laziness, managed to discern a philosopher in a friend, because he sometimes speaks very correct speeches. Life: good life! What is there to look for? interests of the mind, heart? Oblomov says to a friend. Just look where is the center around which all this revolves: it is not there, there is nothing deep that touches the living. All these are dead people, sleeping people, worse than me, these members of the world and society! .. "

“You reason like an ancient,” Stolz concludes. And yet, even that is good, at least you reason, you do not sleep.

The insightful Oblomov was tired of everything, and therefore he tried to close himself in the shell of his ridiculous dreams and dreams and limit himself to staying in his own house, where everything is so familiar and familiar, where there is no fuss and mock fun. But living according to a friend’s plan is also extremely difficult for him ...

And here is another scene. “Now or never,” Stolz declares, and Oblomov makes a great effort on himself, deciding to follow his friend's advice and get a French passport. However, at that time he did not go anywhere. But unexpected changes take place in his personal life: Oblomov falls in love with Olga Ilyinskaya, a simple and at the same time noble woman. His friend Andrey also treats her with trepidation.

But Ilya Ilyich’s approach to the girl is original: not wanting to flatter, here too he shows some kind of clumsiness, indifference to pompous phrases, and maybe even ignorance, saying: It doesn’t cost me anything to say: “Ah! I will be very glad, happy, you, of course, sing excellently ... it will bring me ... But is it really necessary?

Finally, Olga began to sing, and Oblomov could not resist an enthusiastic "Ah." “Do you hear? Stoltz told her. Tell me honestly, Ilya: how long has this not happened to you? he asked his friend in love. Unfortunately, Oblomov's infantilism eventually prevailed over his bright feelings for Olga Ilyinskaya. He could not, and did not want to overcome his natural laziness and become the husband of this beautiful woman. In the end, it was Andrei Stoltz who took Olga as his wife, who, it turns out, was also in love with her, but did not want to interfere with his friend's happiness.

The time for change comes, and Oblomov marries Agafya, the widow of the collegiate secretary Pshenitsyn, an economic, kind and intelligent woman who faithfully looked after him in times of illness and depression. His life again goes measuredly and smoothly. Agafya surrounds her husband with care and maintains complete order in the house. But what about Stoltz?

Unfortunately, the last meeting of friends five years later was very sad. "Dead!" - Andrei Ivanovich lamented about his friend, seeing him in an extremely difficult state of mind. He was also shocked by the fact that Agafya is the wife of Ilya. At this unexpected news, it was as if a stone wall opened up between friends, and Stolz realized that his comrade would never leave Oblomovka again. But nevertheless, he heeded the requests of Ilya Ilyich "not to forget his son Andrei." And he promised himself to lead the boy in a completely different way, and with him "to bring their youthful dreams into action."

This kind of friendship is very important.

Following the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz, we can conclude: such friendship is also necessary and useful, because they surprisingly complemented each other and supported each other in difficult moments of life. It is a pity, of course, that Ilya Oblomov died, unable to cope with internal apathy and a lazy lifestyle, but after him there was a son who was taken up by his best and faithful friend, Andrei Ivanovich. This time he also helped Ilya - now having adopted his own blood and giving the child a chance for a full, meaningful life. But how could it have happened otherwise? After all, the friendship of Ilya and Andrey has always been real.

Why are Stolz and Oblomov friends?

The idea of ​​the novel "Oblomov" arose by the end of the 50s of the XIX century, at the same time Goncharov in the "Literary collection with illustrations" published the chapter "Oblomov's Dream", which later became the compositional center of the work. The novel was published in full in 1859 in the journal Domestic Notes.

The whole work of Goncharov is built on the antithesis, which helped the author to better reveal the characters of the characters, to reveal the author's intention. The novel contrasts the central characters - Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and Andrei Ivanovich Stolz.

Our experts can check your essay according to the USE criteria

Site experts Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.

From the first pages of the novel, starting with the portrait characteristics of the characters, the reader notices the difference between them. The antipode of the “flabby beyond his years”, bored and apathetic Oblomov is Stolz, all made up of “bones, muscles and nerves”, energetic and prudent. However, despite all the differences between the heroes, the friendship between Oblomov and Stolz lasts for many years. What is the reason for the close friendship of the characters?

The secret of the long friendship between Oblomov and Stolz, first of all, lies in the fact that the characters have known each other since childhood. Goncharov shows how the years of childhood and general studies bring together such different characters: "...they were connected by childhood and school - two strong springs." Drawing pictures of life in Oblomovka, the writer draws attention to the scenes of joint games of children and notices that Stolz was accepted as one of his own in the Oblomov family. Being by nature an inquisitive and active boy, Oblomov enjoys exploring the world around him with Stolz. According to Goncharov, it is the difference in education that determines the different formation of characters. In the composition “Oblomov’s Dream”, a large place is given to the school years of the heroes: if Oblomov’s parents left the child at home at every opportunity, spoiled him, then Stolz’s father taught Andrei to work and earn money from an early age, brought up in him industriousness, dedication.

The relationship between Stolz and Oblomov persists into adulthood, remaining as trusting as in childhood. The reason for this is the ability to appreciate the best qualities of each other. Stolz, despite Oblomov's apathy and laziness, saw in him his "pure", "crystal" soul. Oblomov, in turn, sincerely appreciates the best features of Stolz: efficiency, deep mind, decency. Ilya Ilyich, escaping from real life into the beautiful world of dreams, and Andrei Stolz, rational, controlling everything, find in each other those qualities that they cannot reveal in themselves.

Friendship of heroes is built not only on mutual understanding and empathy, but also on mutual assistance. It is the arrival of Stolz that brings diversity to Oblomov's life, introduces him to Olga Ilyinskaya and thereby contributes to the transformation of Ilya Ilyich. In turn, only next to Oblomov does Stolz find peace of mind, calmness, can reflect on the meaning of life. In the episode of the dispute between the heroes (part 2, chapter 4), the worldview of each of them is revealed. To Oblomov’s thoughts about the meaninglessness and emptiness of secular life and romantic dreams of life in the village, Stolz exclaims: “Yes, you are a poet, Ilya!” So Stoltz recognizes the spiritual beauty, the sublimity of a friend.

The topic of friendship Goncharov in the novel "Oblomov" reveals on the example of the relationship between two characters, whose characters and lifestyle are opposed to each other. However, the differences between Oblomov and Stolz are only external, since both heroes are individuals who are in constant search of their own "I", but have not been able to fully reveal themselves and realize their full potential. The images of the heroes are dramatic, since neither the constantly active, prudent Stolz, nor Oblomov, who lives in illusions, find harmony between the two main principles - rational and sensual. This leads to the death of Ilya Ilyich and Stolz's internal conflict.

The famous Russian writer I. A. Goncharov in 1859 publishes his next novel, Oblomov. It was an incredibly difficult period for Russian society, which seemed to be divided into two parts. A minority understood the need and stood up for improving the lives of ordinary people. The majority turned out to be landowners, gentlemen and wealthy nobles, who were directly dependent on the peasants who fed them. In the novel, Goncharov invites the reader to compare the image of Oblomov and Stolz - two friends who are completely different in temperament and fortitude. This is a story about people who, despite internal contradictions and conflicts, remained true to their ideals, values, their way of life. However, sometimes it is difficult to understand the true reasons for such trusting closeness between the main characters. That is why the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz seems so interesting to readers and critics. Next, we will get to know them better.

Stolz and Oblomov: General characteristics

Oblomov is undoubtedly the main figure, but the writer pays more attention to his friend Stolz. The main characters are contemporaries, however, they turn out to be completely different from each other. Oblomov is a man in his 30s. Goncharov describes his pleasant appearance, but emphasizes the absence of a definite idea. Andrey Stolz is the same age as Ilya Ilyich, he is much thinner, with an even dark complexion, with practically no blush. The green expressive eyes of Stolz are also opposed to the gray and hazy look of the protagonist. Oblomov himself grew up in a family of Russian nobles who owned more than one hundred serf souls. Andrey was brought up in a Russian-German family. Nevertheless, he identified himself with Russian culture, professed Orthodoxy.

The relationship between Oblomov and Stolz

One way or another, the lines connecting the fates of the characters in the novel "Oblomov" are present. It was necessary for the author to show how friendship arises between people of polar views and types of temperament.

The relationship between Oblomov and Stolz is largely predetermined by the conditions in which they were brought up and lived in their youth. Both men grew up together, in a boarding house near Oblomovka. Stolz's father served there as a manager. In that village of Verkhlev, everything was saturated with the atmosphere of "Oblomovism", slowness, passivity, laziness, and simplicity of morals. But Andrey Ivanovich Stolz was well educated, read Wieland, learned verses from the Bible, recalculated the illiterate summaries of peasants and factory workers. In addition, he read Krylov's fables, and with his mother he analyzed sacred history. The boy Ilya sat at home under the soft wing of parental care, while Stolz spent a lot of time on the street, talking with the neighbors. Their personalities were formed in different ways. Oblomov was the ward of nannies and caring relatives, while Andrei did not stop doing physical and mental labor.

The Secret of Friendship

The relationship between Oblomov and Stolz is amazing and even paradoxical. Differences between the two characters can be found a huge number, but, of course, there are features that unite them. First of all, Oblomov and Stolz are connected by strong and sincere friendship, but they are similar in their so-called "life dream". Only Ilya Ilyich is dozing at home, on the sofa, and Stolz falls asleep in the same way in his life full of events and impressions. Both of them do not see the truth. Both are unable to give up their own way of life. Each of them is unusually attached to his habits, believing that such behavior is the only correct and reasonable one.

It remains to answer the main question: "Which hero does Russia need: Oblomov or Stolz?" Of course, such active and progressive personalities as the latter will remain in our country forever, will be its driving force, will feed it with their intellectual and spiritual energy. But it must be admitted that even without the Oblomovs, Russia will cease to be the way our compatriots have known it for many centuries. Oblomov needs to be educated, patiently and unobtrusively awakened, so that he, too, would benefit the homeland.

The protagonist of the novel, Oblomov, clearly manifests the features of a “natural person”, which miraculously survived in the middle of the 19th century. Adhering to the ideology of natural life, the hero exists according to his own principles, his own ideology, his own understanding of a whole and harmonious person. He resolutely rejects vanity, vanity, careerism, the pursuit of a profitable marriage and wealth. (Oblomov's guests) "No," he exclaims, "this is not life, but a distortion of the norm, the ideal of life, which nature has indicated as the goal of man." However, with his naivety, he does not think about the fact that all this is possible for him - the master, since he has Zakhar and three hundred more peasants working for his carefree existence. Oblomov is a real landowner - not only in origin, but also in spirit. He feels he has every right to reproach the servant and, in general, all the peasants in obvious ingratitude: "... for you I have devoted all of myself, for you I have retired, I am locked up ...". And, what is most absurd and incredible, the hero himself is completely convinced of the justice of his own accusations.

Ilya Ilyich rejoices in his immobility and independence, completely unaware that he himself is part of that world he hates, where the integrity of the human personality is violated, where, in his opinion, “literacy is harmful to the peasant: teach him, so he, perhaps, and will not plow ... ". Lordly habits have become his second nature, due to which a clear contradiction is created between Oblomov's thoughts, ideology and his actual life. Only sometimes insight illuminates him, and then, with oppressive anxiety, he begins to think not only about his life, but also about the reasons that ruined all the good that was in him: “Someone seemed to have stolen and buried in his own soul the brought he was given a treasure of peace and life... Some secret enemy laid a heavy hand on him at the beginning of the journey and threw him far away from the direct human destination...”. The answer to the question that tormented the hero comes in Oblomov's Dream, where Goncharov paints a picture of a patriarchal-feudal utopia, the main content of which, according to the writer, was "sleep, eternal silence, sluggish life and lack of movement." Thus, the enemy that destroyed everything good in Ilya Ilyich was the very way of his life, everything that later acquired a stable definition - Oblomovism. The author emphasized that he saw in his hero precisely the embodiment of "dead life", which mercilessly destroys the human soul, human nature itself.

Oblomov in the novel is opposed to Stolz, who, it would seem, could well become a positive hero. However, Goncharov makes it clear that this image is far from being so unambiguous. This is an energetic, purposeful, striving for activity and movement person. It is people like Stolz, according to the author, who are called to wake up the "petrified kingdom" with its laziness, apathy, and sleep. However, the writer admits that the image of his hero is not convincing enough. He is “weak, pale - an idea peeps out of him too naked,” Goncharov later said. His strength and convictions are not enough to stand up for a decisive struggle, to justify his ideas by deed. He is too susceptible to the influence of reason and almost completely devoid of feeling. He still fully belongs to the bourgeois world from which he emerged. “We will not go with Manfreds and Fausts to a daring fight against rebellious issues, we will not accept their challenge, we will bow our heads ...,” Stolz frankly admits, thereby showing the failure of all his lofty ideas.

Thus, drawing images of opposite characters - Oblomov and Stolz, Goncharov did not create positive and negative characters, but real people, with their strengths and weaknesses. So, Oblomov, for all his passivity and inactivity, is still capable of a subtle feeling, able to see the shortcomings of society. But due to his softness, delicacy, vulnerability, and also under the influence of the environment, he cannot change, see signs of these shortcomings in himself, overcome them in himself. That is why he is unhappy. On the other hand, Stolz cannot be happy, who nevertheless tends to the position of humility.

Using the example of his heroes, Goncharov sought to show the reader all the evil - both social, everyday, and psychological - that Oblomovism carries in itself, protesting at the same time against bourgeois lack of spirituality, revealing the danger of the bourgeois principles of life embodied in Stolz. The writer resolutely advocated the harmonious completeness, the integrity of the spiritual world of a person, which is possible only with a combination of positive and eradication of the negative aspects of the nature of both characters.

Oblomov and Stolz are the main characters of Goncharov's novel "Oblomov". They are people of the same class, society, time. It would seem that living in the same environment, their characters, worldview should be similar. But, reading the novel, we are surprised to find in Oblomov and Stolz different components that make up their personality. What makes them different? To answer this question, we trace their physical and spiritual development from childhood, as this lays the foundations of their characters. Stolz, he was brought up in a poor family. His father origin was German. Mother Russian noblewoman. All the days of the family were spent at work. When Stolz grew up, his father began to take him to the field, to the market, forced him to work. At the same time, he taught him the sciences, taught the German language. Then Stolz began to send son to the city with errands, "and it never happened that he forgot something, changed it, overlooked it, made a mistake." His mother taught him literature and managed to give an excellent spiritual education to her son. So, Stolz was formed as a strong, intelligent young man. Oblomov. His parents were nobles. Their life in the village of Oblomovka followed its own special laws. The most important thing in their lives was food. She devoted a lot of time. They decided with the whole family "what dishes will be for lunch or dinner." After dinner, a long sleep followed. The whole house fell asleep. This is how all the days went: sleep and food. When Oblomov grew up, he was sent to study at the gymnasium. Parents were not interested in Ilyusha's knowledge. They dreamed of getting a certificate proving that "Ilya went through all the sciences and arts." As for physical education, they did not even let him go outside. They were afraid that he would not be killed, would not get sick. So, Oblomov grew up a downtrodden boy, without education, but kind in the soul. Now let's analyze their views on life. Work for Stolz was part of his life, a pleasure. He did not shun even the most menial work. For Oblomov, it was a burden. He was a gentleman, which means that he did not work should devote not a drop of time. I'm not even talking about physical labor. He was even too lazy to get up from the sofa, leave the room to be cleaned there. Their lifestyle also speaks about the character of the characters. Oblomov spends his life in existence on the sofa. He is nothing does not do anything, is not interested in anything (he still cannot bring himself to finish reading the book "Journey in Africa", even the pages of this book turned yellow). Stolz leads an active life. From the moment he left home, he lives by work. Thanks to work, willpower, patience, he became rich and known to a wide range of people. Oblomov's ideal of happiness is complete peace and good food. And he achieved this: he slept peacefully on the couch and ate well. Servants cleaned up after him and at home he had no big problems with the household. Stolz's ideal of happiness is life in work. He has it. He works hard, his life is full of action. But, despite all the differences between them, they are friends, friends since childhood. They are brought together by the best parts of character: honesty, kindness, decency. You can also talk about Oblomov's love for Olga, if this, of course, can be called love. To achieve her love, he began to read, go to museums, walk. But this change is only external. Inside, Ilya Ilyich remains the same Oblomov. The essence of the novel is that inaction can destroy all the best feelings of a person, corrode his soul, destroy his personality, and work, the desire for education will bring happiness.,

Note

"natural person" - a simple person, kind-hearted, he is not a secular person (Nikolai Kirsanov)

Oblomov and Stolz have been friends since childhood. Therefore, since childhood, they have a very strong influence on each other. Little Andryusha liked the calmness and peace that Ilya gave him, and Ilyusha, in turn, was attracted by the energy that was seething in Stolz, and it remained that way when they grew up.