Contrast between secular society and noble families. Secular society in the image “War and Peace” (Tolstoy Lev N.)

Petersburg

Moscow secular society

People's Thought" in the novel "War and Peace".

The novel War and Peace was conceived as a novel about a Decembrist returning from an amnesty in 1856. But the more Tolstoy worked with archival materials, the more he realized that without telling about the uprising itself and, more deeply, about the War of 1812, it was impossible to write this novel. So the concept of the novel gradually transformed, and Tolstoy created a grandiose epic. This is a story about the feat of the people, about the victory of their spirit in the War of 1812. Later, speaking about his work, Tolstoy wrote that the main idea of the novel is "folk thought" . It lies not only and not so much in the depiction of the people themselves, their way of life, their life, but in the fact that every positive hero of the novel ultimately connects his fate with the fate of the nation. On the pages of the novel, and especially in the second part of the epilogue, Tolstoy says that until now all history has been written as the history of individuals, as a rule, tyrants, monarchs, and no one has yet thought about what is the driving force of history . According to Tolstoy, this is the so-called swarm principle, the spirit and will of not one person, but the nation as a whole. And how strong is the spirit and will of the people, so probable are certain historical events. Thus, Tolstoy explains the victory in the Patriotic War by the fact that two wills collided: the will of the French soldiers and the will of the entire Russian people. This war was fair for the Russians, they fought for their Motherland, so their spirit and will to win turned out to be stronger than the spirit and will of the French, so Russia’s victory over France was predetermined.
The War of 1812 became a milestone, a test for all the good characters in the novel: for Prince Andrei, who feels an extraordinary uplift before the Battle of Borodino, faith in victory; for Pierre Bezukhov, all of whose thoughts are aimed at helping to expel the invaders, he even develops a plan to kill Napoleon; for Natasha, who gave the carts to the wounded, because it was impossible not to give them back, it was “shameful and disgusting” not to give them back; for Petya Rostov, who takes part in the hostilities of a partisan detachment and dies in a battle with the enemy; for Denisov, Dolokhov, even for Anatoly Kuragin. All these people, throwing away everything personal, become one and participate in the formation of the will to win. This will to victory is especially clearly manifested in mass scenes: in the scene of the surrender of Smolensk (remember the merchant Ferapontov, who, succumbing to some unknown, inner force, orders all his goods to be distributed to the soldiers, and what cannot be endured is set on fire) in the scene of preparation for The battle of Borodino (the soldiers put on white shirts, as if preparing for the last battle) in the scene of the battle between the partisans and the French. The theme of guerrilla warfare occupies a special place in the novel. Tolstoy emphasizes that the war of 1812 was indeed a people's war, because the people themselves rose up to fight the invaders. The detachments of elders Vasilisa Kozhina and Denis Davydov were already operating, and the heroes of the novel, Denisov and Dolokhov, were also creating their own detachments. Tolstoy calls the brutal, life-or-death war “the club of the people’s war”:
“The club of the people’s war rose with all its formidable and majestic strength and, without asking anyone’s tastes or rules, with stupid simplicity, but with expediency, without considering anything, it rose, fell and nailed the French until the entire invasion was destroyed.”.

Family Thought" in the novel "War and Peace".

There are five main families involved: Rostov, Bolkonsky, Kuragin, Drubetsky and Bezukhov. Other, less colorful families are also mentioned in the novel: Bergs, Karagins, Dolokhovs etc.

Rostovs: Count Rostov, Countess Rostova, Vera, Nikolai, Natasha, Petya, Sonya.

Bolkonskys: Nikolai Bolkonsky, Andrei, Lisa Bolkonskaya (Meinen, Andrei’s wife, “little princess”, Kutuzov’s niece), Marya, Nikolenka, Mademoiselle Burien.

Kuragin: Prince Vasily, Princess Kuragin, Ellen Kuragin, Ippolit Kuragin, Anatol Kuragin.

Drubetskoy: Anna Drubetskaya, Boris Drubetskoy.

Schoengraben and Austerlitz in the novel "War and Peace".

The role of the epilogue.

Epilogue is the final part of the work, in which the denouement of the plot, the fate of the heroes are finally clarified, and the main idea of the work is formulated. The epilogue is the conclusion of the novel. In the works of L. N. Tolstoy and F. M. Dostoevsky, the role of the epilogue is extremely large:

* The epilogue logically completes the plot of the work.

Tolstoy's philosophical position is so distant from the plot of the work that it could exist independently, as a philosophical treatise. The plot denouement (the first part of the epilogue) occupies a significantly smaller part of the epilogue. 7 years have passed since the war. Marya married Rostov, their happiness is based on Mary’s constant spiritual work. Nikolai admires her mind and soul. Nikolai manages the estate well, Sonya lives with them. There was no soul visible in Natasha, only her face and body. The main thing for her is serving her husband and family. Pierre tells Nikolai about the latest political news, says that the sovereign does not delve into any matters, that the situation in the state is heating up, that everything is ready for a coup. Pierre assures that it is necessary to organize a society, maybe even an illegal one, in order to be useful. Nikolai does not agree with this, recalling that he took an oath: “Tell me now Arakcheev to go at you with a squadron and cut down - I won’t think for a second and I’ll go.” New challenges await Pierre. Trials related to Pierre's participation in a political circle. (As we understand, Pierre will become a Decembrist and take part in the uprising on Senate Square.) So Tolstoy proves to us “that people, like rivers,” change all the time, look for something, strive for something, and this desire for harmony, to truth makes them “quite good.

(Nikolenka's Dream) She and Uncle Pierre walked ahead of a huge army and joyfully approached their goal. But suddenly Uncle Nikolai appears in front of them in a menacing pose, ready to kill the first one to move forward. Nikolenka turns around and sees that it is no longer Uncle Pierre standing next to him, but his father, Prince Andrei, who is caressing him. The boy interprets this dream as follows: “My father was with me and caressed me. He approved of me, he approved of Uncle Pierre. I know they want me to study. And I will study. But someday I will stop; and then I will do it. Everyone will know, everyone will love me, everyone will admire me. Yes, I will do something that would make even him happy..."

In the second part, Tolstoy once again talks about the historical process, about the fact that it is not the individual who makes history, but the masses of the people, guided by common interests, who make it. A person is important in history only to the extent that he understands and accepts these interests. Tolstoy asks himself a global problem: “What moves the world, its history?” And he gives the answer to it: “The laws of necessity.” His position is fatalism. According to Tolstoy, a person is only a pawn in a complex game, the outcome of which is predetermined, and the goal of the pawn is to understand the rules of the game and follow them (and in this case be among the righteous winners), otherwise the pawn will be punished by fate, resistance to which is useless . A gigantic illustration of this position is the picture of war, where everyone, including kings and great commanders, is powerless before fate, where the one who better understands the laws of necessity and does not resist them wins (Kutuzov).

A broad philosophical position is presented. To confirm his position in the second part of the epilogue, he does not use the plot material of his work, but uses newly invented arguments. Particularly noteworthy is the extraordinary innovation of Tolstoy, who turned the epilogue from a small appendage or just the last chapter into an independent work, the role of which is comparable to the role of the main part of War and Peace.

Philosophy of history.

L. N. Tolstoy’s work “War and Peace” was conceived as a narrative about the life of some fictional characters from high society, but gradually it turned into an epic, including not only descriptions of real events of the early 19th century, but also entire chapters, the task of which is to convey to the reader the philosophical views of the author. Turning to the depiction of history, Tolstoy was forced to get acquainted with a variety of materials on the era of interest to him. The position of none of the contemporary scientists could satisfy a person who wanted to “get to the root” of everything. The author of War and Peace gradually develops his own concept of historical development; which was necessary to present in order to reveal to people a “new truth” and to make the logic of the novel clearer.

One of the first problems the writer faced was assessing the role of the individual and the masses in history. And if at the beginning of the creation of “War and Peace” the main attention was paid to individual heroes, then as he studied the war of 12, Tolstoy became more and more convinced of the decisive role of the people. In the second part of the epilogue, the main idea that permeates the entire narrative was formulated as follows: “... the more directly people participate in the commission of an action, the less they can order and the greater their number... the less direct participation that people take in the action itself, the more they order and the smaller their number...” The idea that the actions of the masses determine history is confirmed in many episodes of the novel. Thus, the victory in the Battle of Shengraben for the Russian troops was not brought about by the successful orders of Prince Bagration, who “... only tried to pretend that everything that was done out of necessity, chance and the will of private commanders... was done... in accordance with his intentions ”, and the actions of the “little” captain Tushin, as well as everyone’s awareness of the need for this battle to save the army. At the same time, when the ordinary soldier did not see the goal of the battle, as was the case at Austerlitz, neither the knowledge of the German command of the area, nor the thoughtful disposition, nor the presence of the emperors could influence the unfavorable outcome. The decisive importance of the spirit of the army is especially clearly visible in the Battle of Borodino, when the Russians were able to prove their moral superiority over the enemy, despite the intrigues at Kutuzov’s headquarters and the inconvenience of the position.

According to Tolstoy, the task of the individual is not to interfere with the natural course of history, the “swarm” life of the people. Bagration understands this, and his behavior during the Battle of Shengraben can serve as proof; Kutuzov knows this, feeling the moment when it is necessary to fight a grandiose battle, allowing himself to make the decision to leave Moscow, seeing meaning only in the war of liberation. The main difference between the “most illustrious” and Napoleon is not in the inactivity of the Russian commander, but in the old man’s awareness that his orders are not decisive for the course of history.

Speaking about Tolstoy's position on the role of the individual in history, we inevitably come to a description of the contradictions in the concept of the author of War and Peace.

On the one hand, one of the fundamental theses is “a person consciously lives for himself, but serves as an unconscious tool for achieving historical, social goals.” According to Tolstoy, it is natural that “most of the people of that time did not pay any attention to the general course of affairs, but were guided only by the personal interests of the present.” On the other hand, all the heroes of the novel are divided into two groups. The first of them includes all those who are not indifferent to the fate of the Motherland, whose lives are turned upside down during the War of 1812, whose “personal interest” is directly related to the “general course of affairs.” This is the old Prince Bolkonsky, gathering a militia, preparing to defend the Bald Mountains from the French, the Rostovs, giving up their carts for the wounded, Petya, Nikolai, Andrei, Pierre, who see the goal of their life in participating in the Patriotic War.

The second half includes those whose lives do not change with the beginning of the war and do not depend on it in any way. These are pseudo-patriots from the St. Petersburg salon A.P. Scherer and visitors to Helen’s house, sympathizing with Napoleon and the French, Berg, preoccupied with the purchase of a wardrobe while the residents of Moscow were leaving, Boris, interested only in promotion. All of them are condemned by the author precisely for their indifference to the common cause. Kutuzov, who understands the deep meaning of what is happening, becomes an ideal person.

In the epic, an important place is given to discussions about the general nature of the development of life. When talking about this part of the novel’s historical and philosophical digressions, the term “fatalism” is often used. The laws of history are not yet accessible to people, so the concept of fate, fate, arises, which replaces the entire set of unknown causes.

Secular society in the novel "War and Peace".

One of the main types of pastime for members of high society were social receptions at which news, the situation in Europe and much more were discussed. It seemed to the new person that everything being discussed was important, and all those present were very smart and thoughtful people, seriously interested in the subject of the conversation. In fact, there is something mechanical and indifferent in these techniques, and Tolstoy compares those present in Anna Pavlovna Scherer’s salon to a talking machine. An intelligent, serious, inquisitive person cannot be satisfied with such communication, and he quickly becomes disillusioned with the world. However, the basis of a secular society is made up of those who like such communication and for whom it is necessary. Such people develop a certain stereotype of behavior, which they transfer into their personal and family life. Therefore, in their relationships in the family there is little cordiality, more practicality and calculation. A typical St. Petersburg family is the Kuragin family.
It appears to us completely differently Moscow secular society , which, however, is still somewhat similar to the St. Petersburg one. The first image of Moscow light in the novel is the description of the name day in the Rostov house. The morning reception of guests is reminiscent of social receptions in St. Petersburg: discussion of news, although not on a global scale, but local, feigned feelings of surprise or indignation, but the impression immediately changes with the appearance of children, who bring spontaneity, happiness, and causeless fun into the living room. At dinner with the Rostovs, all the qualities inherent in the Moscow nobility are manifested: hospitality, cordiality, nepotism. Moscow society in many ways resembles one big family, where everyone knows everything, where they forgive each other’s small weaknesses and can publicly scold each other for mischief. Only in such a society could a figure like Akhrosimova appear, and Natasha’s outburst be condescendingly appreciated. Unlike the St. Petersburg nobility, the Moscow nobility is closer to the Russian people, their traditions and customs. In general, Tolstoy’s sympathies, apparently, are on the side of the Moscow nobility; it is not for nothing that his favorite heroes, the Rostovs, live in Moscow. And although the writer cannot approve of many of the traits and morals of Muscovites (gossiping, for example), he does not focus on them. In depicting secular society, Tolstoy actively uses the technique of “detachment,” which allows him to look at events and characters from an unexpected point of view. So , when describing an evening at Anna Pavlovna Scherer's, the writer compares the salon with a spinning workshop, illuminating a social reception from an unexpected side and allowing the reader to penetrate into the essence of the relationships at it. The French language in the speech of the heroes is also a technique of “detachment,” making it possible to more fully create the image of a secular society , who at that time spoke mainly French.

In the novel "War and Peace" Tolstoy created a true and complete picture of Russian life in the first quarter of the 19th century. During this period in Russia, the main social role was played by the nobles, so a significant place in the novel is given to the description of secular society. It should be noted that high society at that time was represented mainly by two metropolitan societies, quite different from each other: St. Petersburg and Moscow.

St. Petersburg is the capital, a cold, inhospitable city, on par with European cities. The St. Petersburg high society is a special world with its own laws, customs, morals, the intellectual center of the country, oriented towards Europe. But the first thing that catches your eye when describing relationships in this society is unnaturalness. All representatives of high society are accustomed to playing roles imposed on them by society or taken by them voluntarily; it is not for nothing that Prince Vasily is compared to an actor in the novel.

Moscow secular society appears to us completely different, which, however, is still similar in some ways to St. Petersburg. The first image of Moscow light in the novel is the description of the name day in the Rostov house. The morning reception of guests is reminiscent of social receptions in St. Petersburg: discussion of news, although not on a global scale, but local, feigned feelings of surprise or indignation, but the impression immediately changes with the appearance of children, who bring spontaneity, happiness, and causeless fun into the living room. At dinner with the Rostovs, all the qualities inherent in the Moscow nobility are manifested: hospitality, cordiality, nepotism. Moscow society in many ways resembles one big family, where everyone knows everything, where they forgive each other’s small weaknesses and can publicly scold each other for mischief. Only in such a society could a figure like Akhrosimova appear, and Natasha’s outburst be condescendingly appreciated. Unlike the St. Petersburg nobility, the Moscow nobility is closer to the Russian people, their traditions and customs. In general, Tolstoy’s sympathies, apparently, are on the side of the Moscow nobility; it is not for nothing that his favorite heroes, the Rostovs, live in Moscow. And although the writer cannot approve of many of the traits and morals of Muscovites (gossiping, for example), he does not focus on them. In his depiction of secular society, Tolstoy actively uses the technique of “detachment,” which allows him to look at events and characters from an unexpected point of view. Thus, when describing an evening at Anna Pavlovna Scherer’s, the writer compares the salon with a spinning workshop, illuminating the social reception from an unexpected angle and allowing the reader to penetrate into the essence of the relationships at it. The French language in the speech of the heroes is also a technique of “detachment,” making it possible to more fully create the image of a secular society that at that time spoke mainly French.

One of the main issues that underlies the work and my essay on the topic “Secular society in the novel “War and Peace”” is the essence of the Russian people, with all its versatility, shortcomings and advantages. In the novel, Tolstoy’s goal was to show, without embellishment and flattery, the true face of society at the beginning of the 19th century, in order to depict against its background the essence of the Russian soul and the main national values, such as home, family and state.

The image of society serves not only as a force that shapes views, opinions, principles of thinking and ideals of behavior, but also as a background for the expression of outstanding personalities, thanks to whose high moral qualities and heroism the war was won, which largely affected the future fate of the state.

The image of secular society in the novel “War and Peace” (2nd version)

In the novel “War and Peace,” Tolstoy created a truthful and holistic picture of Russian life in the first quarter of the 19th century. During this period in Russia, the main social role was played by the nobles, so a significant place in the novel is given to the description of secular society. It should be noted that high society at that time was represented mainly by two metropolitan societies, quite different from each other: St. Petersburg and Moscow.
St. Petersburg is the capital, a cold, inhospitable city, on par with European cities. The St. Petersburg high society is a special world with its own laws, customs, morals, the intellectual center of the country, oriented towards Europe. But the first thing that catches your eye when describing relationships in this society is unnaturalness. All representatives of high society are accustomed to playing roles imposed on them by society or taken by them voluntarily; it is not for nothing that Prince Vasily is compared to an actor in the novel.
One of the main types of pastime for members of high society were social receptions at which news, the situation in Europe and much more were discussed. It seemed to the new person that everything being discussed was important, and all those present were very smart and thoughtful people, seriously interested in the subject of the conversation. In fact, there is something mechanical and indifferent in these techniques, and Tolstoy compares those present in the Scherer salon to a talking machine. An intelligent, serious, inquisitive person cannot be satisfied with such communication, and he quickly becomes disillusioned with the world. However, the basis of a secular society is made up of those who like such communication and for whom it is necessary. Such people develop a certain stereotype of behavior, which they transfer into their personal and family life. Therefore, in their relationships in the family there is little cordiality, more practicality and calculation. A typical St. Petersburg family is the Kuragin family.
Moscow secular society appears to us completely different, which, however, is still similar in some ways to St. Petersburg. The first image of Moscow light in the novel is the description of the name day in the Rostov house. The morning reception of guests is reminiscent of social receptions in St. Petersburg: discussion of news, although not on a global scale, but local, feigned feelings of surprise or indignation, but the impression immediately changes with the appearance of children, who bring spontaneity, happiness, and causeless fun into the living room. At dinner with the Rostovs, all the qualities inherent in the Moscow nobility are manifested: hospitality, cordiality, nepotism. Moscow society in many ways resembles one big family, where everyone knows everything, where they forgive each other’s small weaknesses and can publicly scold each other for mischief. Only in such a society could a figure like Akhrosimova appear, and Natasha’s outburst be condescendingly appreciated. Unlike the St. Petersburg nobility, the Moscow nobility is closer to the Russian people, their traditions and customs. In general, Tolstoy’s sympathies, apparently, are on the side of the Moscow nobility; it is not for nothing that his favorite heroes, the Rostovs, live in Moscow. And although the writer cannot approve of many of the traits and morals of Muscovites (gossiping, for example), he does not focus on them. In depicting secular society, Tolstoy actively uses the technique of “detachment,” which allows him to look at events and characters from an unexpected point of view. So , when describing an evening at Anna Pavlovna Scherer's, the writer compares the salon with a spinning workshop, illuminating from an unexpected side the secular reception and allowing the reader to penetrate into the essence of the relationships at it. The French language in the speech of the heroes is also a technique of “detachment,” making it possible to more fully create the image of the secular society, which at that time spoke mainly French.
The novel “War and Peace” was created in the second half of the 19th century. This means that Tolstoy was familiar with the life of secular society at the beginning of the century only from the literature of that time or from the stories of contemporaries of that era. Poets and writers of the early 19th century often turned to the depiction of the nobility in their works, that is, in literature at that time there already existed a certain tradition in the depiction of high society, and Tolstoy largely continues this tradition, although he often departs from it. This allowed him to create very. a complete and reliable image of the secular society of Russia at the beginning of the 19th century.

The image of secular society in the novel “War and Peace” (version 3)

Tolstoy recalled that he was inspired to write the novel “War and Peace” by “folk thought.” It was from the people that Tolstoy himself learned and advised others to do the same. Therefore, the main characters of his novel are people from the people or those who were close to ordinary people. Without denying the merits of the nobility to the people, he divides it into two categories. The first category includes those who, by their character, outlook, worldview, are close to the people or come to this through trials. The best representatives of the nobility in this regard are Prince Andrei Bolkonsky, Pierre Bezukhov, Natasha Rostova, Princess Marya Bolkonskaya.

But there are other representatives of the nobility, the so-called “secular society,” who constitute a special caste. These are people who recognize only a few values: title, power and money. Only those who have one or all of the listed values are allowed into their circle and recognized as their own. Secular society is completely empty, just as its individual representatives are empty and insignificant, people without any moral or ethical principles, without life goals. Their spiritual world is just as empty and insignificant. But despite this, they have great power. This is the elite that runs the country, the people who decide the destinies of their fellow citizens.

Tolstoy tries in the novel to show the entire nation and all its representatives. "War and Peace" begins with scenes depicting the highest noble society. The author shows mainly the present, but also touches on the past. Tolstoy paints the nobles of this bygone era. Eraf Kirill Bezukhov is one of their representatives. Bezukhov is rich and noble, he has a good estate, money, power, which he received from the kings for small services. A former favorite of Catherine, a reveler and a libertine, he devoted his entire life to pleasure. He is opposed by the old Prince Bolkonsky, his peer. Bolkonsky is a loyal defender of the fatherland, which he served faithfully. For this, he was repeatedly in disgrace and out of favor with those in power.

“Secular society,” even with the onset of the War of 1812, changed little: “calm, luxurious, concerned only with ghosts, reflections of life, St. Petersburg life went on as before; and because of the course of this life, it was necessary to make great efforts to recognize the danger and the difficult situation in which the Russian people found themselves. There were the same exits, balls, the same French theater, the same interests of the courts, the same interests of service and intrigue...” Only the conversations changed - they began to talk more about Napoleon and patriotism.

At the top of noble society was Emperor Alexander I. Alexander I is shown exactly as most nobles imagined him. But in the appearance of the emperor, traits of duplicity, posturing and that cutesy sensuality, in which flatterers saw a manifestation of the “lofty soul of the king,” are already appearing. The true appearance of Alexander I is especially clearly shown in the scene of the king’s arrival in the army after the defeat of the invaders. The Tsar embraces Kutuzov, accompanying them with a hissing hiss: “Old comedian.” Tolstoy believes that the top of the nation has become dead and is now living an “artificial life.” All the king's associates are no different from him. my. The country is run by a bunch of foreigners who don't care about Russia. Ministers, generals, diplomats, staff officers and other close associates of the emperor are busy with their own enrichment and career. The same lies, the same intrigue, and opportunism reign here as everywhere else. It was the Patriotic War of 1812 that showed the true essence of government officials. Their false patriotism is covered up with loud words about their homeland and people. But their mediocrity and inability to govern the country are clearly visible in the novel.

In "War and Peace" all layers of Moscow noble society are represented. Tolstoy, characterizing noble society, strives to show not individual representatives, but entire families. After all, it is in the family that both the foundations of integrity and morality, as well as spiritual emptiness and idleness, are laid. One of these families is the Kuragin family. Its head, Vasily Kuragin, occupies a fairly high position in the country. He is a minister called to take care of the people. Instead, all the elder Kuragin’s concerns are directed towards himself and his own children. His son Ippolit is a diplomat who cannot speak Russian at all. For all his stupidity and insignificance, he craves power and wealth. Anatol Kuragin is no better than his brother. His only entertainment is carousing and drinking. It seems that this person is completely indifferent to everything except indulging his own whims. His friend Drubetskoy is Anatole’s constant companion and a witness to his dark deeds.

We meet these people already on the first pages of the novel, where Tolstoy describes the visitors and regulars of Anna Pavlovna Sherer’s salon. The cold and calculating rogue Vasily Kuragin, who is looking for clever moves “to the cross or to the town,” and his son Ana-tol, whom his father himself calls “a restless fool,” and the destroyers of their destinies Hippolyte and Helen are spinning here. Helen is the first beauty of the city, but at the same time a cold and spiritually empty person. She realizes her beauty and puts it on display, allowing her to be admired. But this woman is far from being as harmless as she might seem at first glance. The author emphasizes Helen's smile - it is “unchangeable.” I would like to compare Helen herself with Helen the Beautiful, the ancient heroine, because of whom the Trojan War began. Helen also brings nothing but trouble. Later, taking advantage of Pierre's gullibility, she will lure him into her network and marry him.

In Scherer's salon we see both Pierre and Andrei Bolkonsky. The author contrasts these living people with the dead high society. We understand that Pierre has found himself in a society to which he is alien and which does not understand him at all. Only Andrey's intervention helps to avoid a scandal.

Boris Drubetskoy is another representative of the highest noble society. He is one of those who will replace the older generation. But the author portrays him as distant from the people as everyone else. Boris only cares about his career. He has a cool mind and a sober mind, he knows exactly what he needs in this life. He sets a goal and achieves it. Even during the war, Drubetskoy thinks about awards and promotion, wants to “arrange for himself the best position, especially the position of adjutant with an important person, which seemed especially tempting to him in the army.” He also makes acquaintances only those that are beneficial to him. Let us remember how the Drubetskys turned away from the Rostovs when they were ruined. This is despite the fact that the families were once friendly.

The highest nobility differs from the people even in their language. The language of the noble nobility is a Frenchized language. He is as dead as the rest of society. It preserves empty cliches, once and for all established expressions, ready-made phrases that are used in convenient cases. People have learned to hide their feelings behind common phrases.

Thus, by depicting noble society, Tolstoy shows its inactivity and inability to rule the country. The noble nobility has outlived its usefulness and must leave the stage of history. The necessity and inevitability of this was convincingly demonstrated by the Patriotic War of 1812.

L.N. Tolstoy initially wanted to write a short novel about a Decembrist who returned home from exile. About his views on life, changes in worldview. But in the process of work, I realized that it was impossible to do without the previous history. It was necessary to reveal the origins of the Decembrist movement, the character of the Russian nobility and the common people. But this world is so multifaceted that the work resulted in a voluminous, truly legendary epic novel.

Attitude to war

Showing the war, Tolstoy describes Napoleon's attack on Russia, the Battle of Borodino, the slow return of the Russian army, the French conquest of Moscow, the fire in the capital and the return of Napoleon's army during the harsh winter. The French commander had to flee from Russia under fire from Russian soldiers. His army is suffering from cold and hunger, since the Russians have destroyed all food supplies. Napoleon's capture of Moscow proved futile, and ultimately destroyed most of his army.

Along with these historical events, Tolstoy describes the different classes of Russian society in terms of their participation in the war and the impact the war had on their lives. At the beginning of the novel, the Russian aristocratic class insists on Russian participation in the war. They wanted a quick victory, pride in the Russian nobility. But they did not expect that the war would destroy houses, agriculture, and take many lives of compatriots. However, the majority of this class did not plan to participate in the war themselves, but intended to win the battles through the hands of the peasants.

At the beginning of the novel, representatives of the aristocracy dream of war, admiring the genius of Napoleon. It doesn’t matter to them how many battles will take human lives, how many people will be crippled, how many orphans will be left. During bloody and protracted confrontations, the nobility makes other pathetic speeches, scolding the French commander. The attitude towards the French language, so praised only recently, is also changing. Fines are being introduced for this speech.

Character antagonism

Tolstoy leads the reader to an awareness of true and false moral values, patriotism, honor and dishonor. People like Drubetskoy are eager to go to war only for their own benefit. By killing hundreds of people, they want to get a high officer rank. Their aspirations are base, vile, vulgar, and deceitful. But simple, inconspicuous people, like Tushin, really care about victory, have compassion for people, love, and are deeply rooted for their Motherland. The same applies to women in the novel. Young Natasha Rostova, whom many considered flighty and unconscious, gives her carts to the wounded, realizing that because of this she will not be able to evacuate in time. The author gently pushes us to compare Helen Kuragina and Marya Bolkonskaya. Everyone considers Helen a beauty, many are in love with her. She is in demand in secular society. Maria, on the other hand, has an inconspicuous appearance, is modest and quiet. But she has a sensitive soul, is virtuous, and internally beautiful. You understand this only after reading the novel in its entirety.

Attitude towards peasants

All Moscow and St. Petersburg nobility of that time were landowners. But only a few of them treated the peasants as people. Then it was easy to sell a person, trade him or lose at cards. And the peasants were measured by “souls.” This suggests that the aristocrats imagined themselves almost as gods, thinking that they owned human souls. Meanwhile, the Russian people are the true hero of the great work.

Conclusion

The writer paid a lot of attention to the depiction of the noble class. Lev Nikolaevich makes us understand the insignificance of these people. They are cold, arrogant, prim. Personal gain, money, rank, gossip are more important to them than honor, truth, and morality. It is not customary here to express one’s thoughts openly, out loud, and personal opinion must correspond to the opinion of the crowd. Any sincere manifestation of feelings is only condemned here. Some of them, such as: Pierre Bezukhov, Natasha Rostova, Andrei Bolkonsky, through physical and moral suffering, were able to cleanse themselves and come to inner harmony after brutal self-analysis. But there are only a few of them.

The writer also reveals the role of women in society. She should not be a coquette, like Helen Kuragina, or a society lady, like Anna Scherer, but a mother and wife. This is how the main character of the novel, Natasha Rostova, becomes.

The image of secular society in L. N. Tolstoy’s novel “War and Peace”