The problem of the little man in the work Matrenin Dvor. The work "Matrenin's Dvor" - the problem and arguments

In the journal " New world"Several works by Solzhenitsyn were published, among them " Matrenin Dvor" The story, according to the writer, is “completely autobiographical and reliable.” It talks about the Russian village, about its inhabitants, about their values, about goodness, justice, sympathy and compassion, work and help - qualities that fit in the righteous man, without whom “the village is not worth it.”

"Matrenin's Dvor" is a story about the injustice and cruelty of human fate, about the Soviet order of post-Stalin times and about the life of the most ordinary people living far from city life. The narration is told not from the perspective of the main character, but from the perspective of the narrator, Ignatyich, who in the whole story seems to play the role of only an outside observer. What is described in the story dates back to 1956 - three years passed after the death of Stalin, and then Russian people I still didn’t know and didn’t understand how to live further.

“Matrenin’s Dvor” is divided into three parts:

  1. The first tells the story of Ignatyich, it begins at the Torfprodukt station. The hero immediately reveals his cards, without making any secret of it: he is a former prisoner, and now works as a teacher at a school, he came there in search of peace and tranquility. In Stalin's time, it was almost impossible for people who had been imprisoned to find workplace, and after the death of the leader, many became school teachers (a profession in short supply). Ignatyich stays with an elderly, hardworking woman named Matryona, with whom he finds it easy to communicate and has peace of mind. Her home was poor, the roof sometimes leaked, but this did not mean at all that there was no comfort in it: “Perhaps to someone from the village, who was richer, Matryona’s hut did not seem friendly, but for us that autumn and winter it was quite good."
  2. The second part tells about Matryona’s youth, when she had to go through a lot. The war took her fiancé Fadey away from her, and she had to marry his brother, who still had children in his arms. Taking pity on him, she became his wife, although she did not love him at all. But three years later, Fadey, whom the woman still loved, suddenly returned. The returning warrior hated her and her brother for their betrayal. But hard life could not kill her kindness and hard work, because it was in work and caring for others that she found solace. Matryona even died while doing business - she helped her lover and her sons drag part of her house across the railroad tracks, which was bequeathed to Kira (his daughter). And this death was caused by Fadey’s greed, avarice and callousness: he decided to take away the inheritance while Matryona was still alive.
  3. The third part talks about how the narrator learns about Matryona’s death and describes the funeral and wake. Her relatives are not crying out of grief, but rather because it is customary, and in their heads there are only thoughts about the division of the property of the deceased. Fadey is not at the wake.

Main characters

Matryona Vasilievna Grigorieva is an elderly woman, a peasant woman, who was released from work on a collective farm due to illness. She was always happy to help people, even strangers. In the episode when the narrator moves into her hut, the author mentions that she never intentionally looked for a lodger, that is, she did not want to make money on this basis, and did not profit even from what she could. Her wealth was pots of ficus trees and an old domestic cat that she took from the street, a goat, as well as mice and cockroaches. Matryona also married her fiancé’s brother out of a desire to help: “Their mother died...they didn’t have enough hands.”

Matryona herself also had children, six, but they all died in early childhood, so she later took Fadey’s youngest daughter Kira into her upbringing. Matryona rose early in the morning, worked until dark, but did not show fatigue or dissatisfaction to anyone: she was kind and responsive to everyone. She was always very afraid of becoming a burden to someone, she did not complain, she was even afraid to call the doctor again. As Kira grew up, Matryona wanted to give her room as a gift, which required dividing the house - during the move, Fadey’s things got stuck in a sled on the railroad tracks, and Matryona got hit by a train. Now there was no one to ask for help, there was no person ready to unselfishly come to the rescue. But the relatives of the deceased kept in mind only the thought of profit, of dividing what was left of the poor peasant woman, already thinking about it at the funeral. Matryona stood out very much from the background of her fellow villagers, and was thus irreplaceable, invisible and the only righteous person.

Narrator, Ignatyich, to some extent, is a prototype of the writer. He served his exile and was acquitted, after which he set out in search of a calm and serene life, he wanted to work school teacher. He found refuge with Matryona. Judging by the desire to move away from the bustle of the city, the narrator is not very sociable and loves silence. He worries when a woman takes his padded jacket by mistake, and is confused by the volume of the loudspeaker. The narrator got along with the owner of the house; this shows that he is still not completely antisocial. However, he doesn’t understand people very well: he understood the meaning by which Matryona lived only after she passed away.

Topics and issues

Solzhenitsyn in the story “Matrenin’s Dvor” talks about the life of the inhabitants of a Russian village, about the system of relationships between power and people, about in a high sense selfless labor in the kingdom of selfishness and greed.

Of all this, the theme of labor is shown most clearly. Matryona is a person who does not ask for anything in return and is ready to give herself all for the benefit of others. They don’t appreciate her and don’t even try to understand her, but this is a person who experiences tragedy every day: first, the mistakes of her youth and the pain of loss, then frequent illnesses, hard work, not life, but survival. But from all the problems and hardships, Matryona finds solace in work. And, in the end, it is work and overwork that leads her to death. The meaning of Matryona’s life is precisely this, and also care, help, the desire to be needed. Therefore, active love for others is the main theme of the story.

Also important place The story deals with the issue of morality. Material values ​​in the village are exalted over human soul and her work, on humanity in general. Understand the depth of Matryona's character minor characters they are simply incapable: greed and the desire to possess more blinds them to their eyes and does not allow them to see kindness and sincerity. Fadey lost his son and wife, his son-in-law faces imprisonment, but his thoughts are on how to protect the logs that were not burned.

In addition, the story has a theme of mysticism: the motive of an unidentified righteous man and the problem of cursed things - which were touched by people full of self-interest. Fadey made the upper room of Matryona's hut cursed, undertaking to knock it down.

Idea

The above-mentioned themes and problems in the story “Matrenin’s Dvor” are aimed at revealing the depth of the main character’s pure worldview. An ordinary peasant woman serves as an example of the fact that difficulties and losses only strengthen a Russian person, and do not break him. With the death of Matryona, everything that she figuratively built collapses. Her house is being torn apart, the remains of her property are divided among themselves, the yard remains empty and ownerless. Therefore, her life looks pitiful, no one realizes the loss. But won't the same thing happen with palaces and jewels? powerful of the world this? The author demonstrates the frailty of material things and teaches us not to judge others by their wealth and achievements. The true meaning is the moral character, which does not fade even after death, because it remains in the memory of those who saw its light.

Maybe over time the heroes will notice that a very important part of their life is missing: invaluable values. Why disclose global moral problems in such poor scenery? And what then is the meaning of the title of the story “Matrenin’s Dvor”? Last words that Matryona was a righteous woman erases the boundaries of her court and expands them to the scale of the whole world, thereby making the problem of morality universal.

Folk character in the work

Solzhenitsyn reasoned in the article “Repentance and Self-Restraint”: “There are such born angels, they seem to be weightless, they seem to glide over this slurry, without drowning in it at all, even if their feet touch its surface? Each of us has met such people, there are not ten of them or a hundred of them in Russia, these are righteous people, we saw them, were surprised (“eccentrics”), took advantage of their goodness, in good moments answered them in kind, they disposed - and immediately immersed again to our doomed depths.”

Matryona is distinguished from the rest by her ability to preserve her humanity and a strong core inside. To those who unscrupulously used her help and kindness, it might seem that she was weak-willed and pliable, but the heroine helped based only on her inner selflessness and moral greatness.

Interesting? Save it on your wall!

The story “Matryonin’s Dvor” was written by Solzhenitsyn in 1959. The first title of the story is “A village is not worthwhile without a righteous man” (Russian proverb). The final version of the title was invented by Tvardovsky, who at that time was the editor of the magazine “New World”, where the story was published in No. 1 for 1963. At the insistence of the editors, the beginning of the story was changed and the events were attributed not to 1956, but to 1953. that is, to the pre-Khrushchev era. This is a bow to Khrushchev, thanks to whose permission Solzhenitsyn’s first story “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” (1962) was published.

The image of the narrator in the work “Matryonin’s Dvor” is autobiographical. After Stalin's death, Solzhenitsyn was rehabilitated; he actually lived in the village of Miltsevo (Talnovo in the story) and rented a corner from Matryona Vasilievna Zakharova (Grigorieva in the story). Solzhenitsyn very accurately conveyed not only the details of the life of the prototype Marena, but also the features of life and even the local dialect of the village.

Literary direction and genre

Solzhenitsyn developed Tolstoy's tradition of Russian prose in a realistic direction. The story combines the features of an artistic essay, the story itself and elements of life. The life of the Russian village is reflected so objectively and diversely that the work approaches the genre of “novel-type story.” In this genre, the character of the hero is shown not only at a turning point in his development, but also the history of the character and the stages of his formation are illuminated. The fate of the hero reflects the fate of the entire era and country (as Solzhenitsyn says, the earth).

Issues

At the center of the story is a moral issue. Are many worth it? human lives a captured plot or a decision dictated by human greed not to make a second trip with a tractor? Material values ​​among the people are valued higher than the person himself. Thaddeus's son and his once beloved woman died, his son-in-law is threatened with prison, and his daughter is inconsolable. But the hero is thinking about how to save the logs that the workers did not have time to burn at the crossing.

Mystical motives are at the center of the story. This is the motive of the unrecognized righteous man and the problem of curse on things touched by people with unclean hands pursuing selfish goals. So Thaddeus undertook to demolish Matryonin’s upper room, thereby making it cursed.

Plot and composition

The story "Matryonin's Dvor" has a time frame. In one paragraph, the author talks about how at one of the crossings and 25 years after a certain event, trains slow down. That is, the frame dates back to the early 80s, the rest of the story is an explanation of what happened at the crossing in 1956, the year of the Khrushchev Thaw, when “something began to move.”

The hero-narrator finds the place of his teaching in an almost mystical way, having heard a special Russian dialect at the bazaar and settling in “kondovaya Russia”, in the village of Talnovo.

The plot centers on the life of Matryona. The narrator learns about her fate from herself (she talks about how Thaddeus, who disappeared in the first war, wooed her, and how she married his brother, who disappeared in the second). But the hero finds out more about the silent Matryona from his own observations and from others.

The story describes in detail Matryona's hut, located in a picturesque place near the lake. The hut plays in the life and death of Matryona important role. To understand the meaning of the story, you need to imagine a traditional Russian hut. Matryona's hut was divided into two halves: the actual living hut with a Russian stove and the upper room (it was built for the eldest son in order to separate him when he got married). It is this upper room that Thaddeus dismantles in order to build a hut for Matryona’s niece and his own daughter Kira. The hut in the story is animated. The wallpaper that has fallen off the wall is called its inner skin.

The ficus trees in the tubs are also endowed with living features, reminding the narrator of a silent but living crowd.

The development of action in the story is a static state of harmonious coexistence between the narrator and Matryona, who “do not find the meaning of everyday existence in food.” The climax of the story is the moment of destruction of the upper room, and the work ends with the main idea and bitter omen.

Heroes of the story

The hero-narrator, whom Matryona calls Ignatich, makes it clear from the first lines that he came from prison. He is looking for a teaching job in the wilderness, in the Russian outback. Only the third village satisfies him. Both the first and the second turn out to be corrupted by civilization. Solzhenitsyn makes it clear to the reader that he condemns the attitude of Soviet bureaucrats towards people. The narrator despises the authorities who do not grant Matryona a pension, who force her to work on the collective farm for sticks, who not only do not provide peat for the fire, but also forbid asking about it. He instantly decides not to extradite Matryona, who brewed moonshine, and hides her crime, for which she faces prison.

Having experienced and seen a lot, the narrator, embodying the author’s point of view, acquires the right to judge everything that he observes in the village of Talnovo - a miniature embodiment of Russia.

Matryona - main character story. The author says about her: “Those people have good faces who are at peace with their conscience.” At the moment of meeting, Matryona’s face is yellow, and her eyes are clouded with illness.

To survive, Matryona grows small potatoes, secretly brings forbidden peat from the forest (up to 6 bags a day) and secretly mows hay for her goat.

Matryona lacked womanly curiosity, she was delicate, and did not annoy her with questions. Today's Matryona is a lost old woman. The author knows about her that she got married before the revolution, that she had 6 children, but they all died quickly, “so two didn’t live at once.” Matryona's husband did not return from the war, but disappeared without a trace. The hero suspected that he had new family somewhere abroad.

Matryona had a quality that distinguished her from the rest of the village residents: she selflessly helped everyone, even the collective farm, from which she was expelled due to illness. There is a lot of mysticism in her image. In her youth, she could lift bags of any weight, stopped a galloping horse, had a presentiment of her death, being afraid of steam locomotives. Another omen of her death is a cauldron with holy water that disappeared to God knows where at Epiphany.

Matryona's death seems to be an accident. But why are the mice running around like crazy on the night of her death? The narrator suggests that 30 years later the threat of Matryona’s brother-in-law Thaddeus struck, who threatened to chop Matryona and his own brother, who married her.

After death, Matryona's holiness is revealed. The mourners notice that she, completely crushed by the tractor, has only her right hand left to pray to God. And the narrator draws attention to her face, which is more alive than dead.

Fellow villagers speak of Matryona with disdain, not understanding her selflessness. Her sister-in-law considers her unscrupulous, not careful, not inclined to accumulate goods; Matryona did not seek her own benefit and helped others for free. Even Matryonina’s warmth and simplicity were despised by her fellow villagers.

Only after her death did the narrator understand that Matryona, “not chasing after things”, indifferent to food and clothing, is the basis, the core of all of Russia. On such a righteous person stands the village, the city and the country (“the whole land is ours”). For the sake of one righteous person, as in the Bible, God can spare the earth and save it from fire.

Artistic originality

Matryona appears before the hero as fairy creature, similar to Baba Yaga, who reluctantly gets off the stove to feed the passing prince. She, like a fairytale grandmother, has animal helpers. Shortly before Matryona’s death, the lanky cat leaves the house; the mice, anticipating the death of the old woman, make a particularly rustling noise. But cockroaches are indifferent to the fate of the hostess. Following Matryona, her favorite ficus trees, like a crowd, die: they are of no practical value and are taken out into the cold after Matryona’s death.

A. N. Solzhenitsyn, having returned from exile, worked as a teacher at the Miltsevo school. He lived in the apartment of Matryona Vasilievna Zakharova. All the events described by the author were real. Solzhenitsyn’s story “Matrenin’s Dvor” describes the difficult lot of a Russian collective farm village. We offer for your information an analysis of the story according to plan; this information can be used for work in literature lessons in the 9th grade, as well as in preparation for the Unified State Exam.

Brief Analysis

Year of writing– 1959

History of creation- Working on my work, dedicated to problems Russian village, the writer began in the summer of 1959 on the coast of Crimea, where he was visiting his friends in exile. Beware of censorship, it was recommended to change the title “A village is not worth it without a righteous man,” and on the advice of Tvardovsky, the writer’s story was called “Matrenin’s Dvor.”

Subject– The main theme of this work is the life and everyday life of the Russian hinterland, the problems of relationships common man with power, moral problems.

Composition– The narration is told on behalf of the narrator, as if through the eyes of an outside observer. The features of the composition allow us to understand the very essence of the story, where the heroes will come to the realization that the meaning of life is not only (and not so much) in enrichment, material values, but in moral values, and this problem is universal, and not a single village.

Genre– The genre of the work is defined as “monumental story.”

Direction– Realism.

History of creation

The writer’s story is autobiographical; after exile, he actually taught in the village of Miltsevo, which is named Talnovo in the story, and rented a room from Matryona Vasilievna Zakharova. In his a short story the writer depicted not only the fate of one hero, but also the entire epochal idea of ​​​​the formation of the country, all its problems and moral principles.

Myself meaning of the name“Matrenin’s yard” is a reflection of the main idea of ​​the work, where the boundaries of her yard are expanded to scale the whole country, and the idea of ​​morality turns into universal human problems. From this we can conclude that the history of the creation of “Matryona’s Yard” does not include a separate village, but the history of the creation of a new outlook on life and on the power that governs the people.

Subject

Having carried out an analysis of the work in Matryona's Dvor, it is necessary to determine main topic story, to find out what the autobiographical essay teaches not only the author himself, but, by and large, the whole country.

The life and work of the Russian people, their relationship with the authorities are deeply covered. A person works all his life, losing his personal life and interests in his work. Your health, in the end, without getting anything. Using the example of Matryona, it is shown that she worked all her life without any official documents about her work, and did not even earn a pension.

All recent months Her existence was spent collecting various pieces of paper, and the red tape and bureaucracy of the authorities also led to the fact that she had to go and get the same piece of paper more than once. Indifferent people sitting at desks in offices can easily put the wrong seal, signature, stamp; they do not care about people’s problems. So Matryona, in order to achieve a pension, goes through all the authorities more than once, somehow achieving a result.

The villagers think only about their own enrichment; for them there is no moral values. Thaddeus Mironovich, her husband's brother, forced Matryona to give up the promised part of her house during her lifetime adopted daughter, Kire. Matryona agreed, and when, out of greed, two sleighs were hooked up to one tractor, the cart was hit by a train, and Matryona died along with her nephew and the tractor driver. Human greed is above all, that same evening, her only friend, Aunt Masha, came to her house to pick up the thing promised to her before Matryona’s sisters stole it.

And Thaddeus Mironovich, who also had a coffin with his late son in his house, still managed to transport the logs abandoned at the crossing before the funeral, and did not even come to pay tribute to the memory of the woman who died terrible death because of his insatiable greed. Matryona’s sisters, first of all, took her funeral money and began to divide the remains of the house, crying over their sister’s coffin not out of grief and sympathy, but because that’s how it was supposed to be.

In fact, humanly speaking, no one felt sorry for Matryona. Greed and greed blinded the eyes of fellow villagers, and people will never understand Matryona that with her spiritual development the woman stands at an unattainable height from them. She is a true righteous woman.

Composition

The events of that time are described from the perspective of an outsider, a tenant who lived in Matryona’s house.

Narrator starts his story from the time he was looking for a job as a teacher, trying to find a remote village to live in. As fate would have it, he ended up in the village where Matryona lived and settled down with her.

In the second part, the narrator describes hard fate Matryona, who has not seen happiness since his youth. Her life was hard, with daily labors and worries. She had to bury all of her six children who were born. Matryona endured a lot of torment and grief, but did not become embittered, and her soul did not harden. She is still hardworking and selfless, friendly and peaceful. She never judges anyone, treats everyone evenly and kindly, and still works in her yard. She died trying to help her relatives move their own part of the house.

In the third part, the narrator describes the events after Matryona’s death, the same callousness of people, the woman’s relatives and friends, who, after the woman’s death, flew like crows into the remains of her yard, trying to quickly steal and plunder everything, condemning Matryona for her righteous life.

Main characters

Genre

The publication of Matryona's Court caused a lot of controversy among Soviet critics. Tvardovsky wrote in his notes that Solzhenitsyn is the only writer who expresses his opinion without regard to the authorities and the opinions of critics.

Everyone clearly came to the conclusion that the writer’s work belongs to "monumental story", so in a high spiritual genre a description of a simple Russian woman is given, personifying universal human values.

Topic: “The beauty of the human soul”

The problem of human moral beauty.

What true beauty person? Which moral qualities make a person beautiful?

Matryona is outwardly a very simple, undistinguished peasant woman who has been engaged in hard village labor all her life. Life was difficult for Matryona, like all the residents of the village: they had nothing to buy in the store, and their food was very meager and modest - only potatoes. And Matryona’s house is so dilapidated that it looks like it will crumble into pieces. Mice and cockroaches coexist with the heroine. And she has already gotten used to them.

But how beautiful is the heroine’s soul! Kindness, hard work, responsiveness, the desire to help, to understand others - all this makes her wonderful.

There was no need to ask her for help; it was enough to say that she would come tomorrow to help collect potatoes. And Matryona dropped everything she was doing and went to help, and she was sincerely happy for her neighbors if the potatoes turned out big.

Having lived a hard life, she did not become embittered with people, she was not even offended by the fact that, after working for a quarter of a century on a collective farm, she did not receive a pension, since only factory workers were entitled to a pension. She was sick - but was considered disabled. As if the state simply forgot that such a woman lives, no one cares about her. At the end of her life, Matryona was barely able to obtain a pension for herself for her husband, but her fellow villagers and relatives immediately began to feel so much envy: where did she get so much money?

And Matryona never stopped giving warmth to people. How comfortable and good the narrator felt in her house. It was easy with Matryona, calm at home.

“A village cannot live without a righteous man”– this was the first title of the story. And indeed, it is people like Matryona, the righteous, that is, those who live in truth, who make life purer, kinder, showing with their lives what is valuable on this earth: not material things, but human relations, mutual understanding and respect, There is no need to stoop to transporting Matryona’s dismantled house during her lifetime, as the man Thaddeus once did. The death of the heroine under the wheels of a train while transporting logs across the rails is a terrible warning to people about what they need to value in life. With the death of the heroine, the village seemed to be empty, such kind and sympathetic Matryona was no longer there.

But the terrible thing is that people didn’t even notice that such a woman had passed away. a beautiful woman. The funeral became just an excuse to get drunk. And at the end they even sang songs. This is the moral degradation of people. Even relatives are indifferent to Matryona’s death.

And only the narrator sincerely feels sorry for her. " We all lived next to her and did not understand that she was the very righteous man without whom, according to the proverb, the village would not stand .Neither the city. Neither the whole land is ours.”

A person is beautiful with his soul, his actions, his attitude towards people. This is precisely the conclusion that can be drawn after reading the story of A.I. Solzhenitsyn.

When asked what problems Solzhenitsyn touches on in the story Matryonin's Dvor, the author asked Neuropathologist the best answer is Problem moral choice hero
The problem of loneliness among people

Answer from 22 answers[guru]

Hello! Here is a selection of topics with answers to your question: what problems does Solzhenitsyn touch on in the story Matryonin Dvor

Answer from Maria Gukkina[guru]
The main theme of A. I. Solzhenitsyn’s work is the exposure of the totalitarian system, proof of the impossibility of human existence in it.
But at the same time, it is in such conditions, according to A.I. Solzhenitsyn, that Russian is most clearly manifested national character. The people retain their fortitude and moral ideals- this is his greatness. It should be noted that Solzhenitsyn’s heroes combine the ultimate tragedy of existence and love of life, just as the writer’s work combines tragic motives and hope for life. better life, to strength folk spirit. The writer shows folk characters in the stories “Matryona’s Dvor” and “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” in the images of the old woman Matryona and the prisoner Shch-854 Shukhov. Understanding folk character Solzhenitsyn’s images are much broader than these two images and include features not only of the “common man”, but also of representatives of other strata of society. But it was in these two images that the author showed what creates the true power of Russia, what Rus' rests on. Although Solzhenitsyn's heroes experienced many deceptions and disappointments in life, both Matryona and Ivan Denisovich retain amazing integrity, strength and simplicity of character. By their existence, they seem to say that Russia exists, there is hope for revival. Matryona is not destined to while away her days in peace. It was urgent to move the room to another village, otherwise Kirochka would miss a good place. It would seem that our heroine should not interfere with the transportation of her own house (the last thing she has left), but should prevent it in every possible way. But no - she decides to help transport the logs. And if Matryona had not gone to the railway and had not pushed the cart over the rails, she would have been alive.
In this work, as in others (“Procession”), Solzhenitsyn expresses his attitude towards people. He doesn’t like the people and tries to depersonalize them, turning them into a “gray mass.” It seems to him that the people around him are “nothing.” They are not able to understand goodness, they don’t care who is next to them. But the author is another matter. He immediately recognizes a “righteous man” in Matryona, but he actually comes to this conclusion too late. We must pay tribute to the author of the story: in revealing the image of the heroine, he tries to emphasize her kindness and boundless love for people. I’m not happy with this work, I don’t like it because it’s impossible to understand author's position: Why did Solzhenitsyn embodied so much evil and dirt in his “creation”?
But what cannot be taken away from Solzhenitsyn is that he writes about life based on personal experience, writes specifically about himself, about what he experienced and saw. The author shows us life as it is (in his understanding). Although, when reading his works, one gets the impression that this man never saw anything other than the bad, the ignorant and the unfair. But that's not the main point. Solzhenitsyn's goal is to reveal to us all the “charm” of existence, using a description of a wretched home, evil neighbors and ungrateful relatives.
Solzhenitsyn talks about injustice, as well as weakness of character, excessive kindness and what this can lead to. He puts his thoughts and his attitude towards society into the author’s mouth. The author (the hero of the story) experienced everything that Solzhenitsyn himself had to endure.
The author probably believes that everything is bad and that in the end misfortune will befall us. And the people around us are soulless, and they don’t see the beauty in others, and they don’t believe in goodness, and in general, except for him, no one saw kindness, modesty and selflessness in Matryona. “We all lived next to her and did not understand that she was the very righteous person without whom, according to the proverb, the village would not stand. Neither the city. Neither the whole land is ours."
Solzhenitsyn, inside, is a hard and dry person. I barely have the strength to read description of the dead Matryona, her mutilated body, is struck by the fact that this was written without emotion, just a statement of fact. This is hard to understand. The most “fun” thing is the end. In a person, no knowledgeable about life, the thought will appear: “Don’t trust.” The sad picture that we see after the death of the heroine proves this to us. Relatives were only thinking about what they could take away