Further into the forest more firewood. Further into the forest more firewood meaning

In the RFii invented by them, they are known. It's not hidden.

It would seem that a huge thought process is not required to understand the elementary, namely that all controls in RFii are copied from the world " from there", with its voiced principles" from there"transferred" here"and what's under power" bourgeoisie"(quotation marks because calling a Russian individual entrepreneur a bourgeois is a compliment to the most seasoned speculator) not someone will come to power, but precisely the same bourgeois. Slogans and chatter are not essential. Hence the conclusion that was voiced - power is a matter of property, which no one has ever decided in elections, and will not decide ... Understanding (and you have probably already seen that today understanding is in no way connected with further activities based on this understanding) these " little things"already, it would seem, they are forced to see that all these pre-election strokes of the party in power, pah ... and pah again. But no ... and this is not enough. And that's not all .... Even your own vision, and your life experience is in no way connected with the choice of the government that shows you what Russia is. Do not believe your eyes? Turn on any channel and you will see Russia through the eyes of the media and any other " analytics"who gained access to the brains of the nation. And? What kind of Russia are they showing you from morning to morning?

But...remember Khrushchev? His story is bypassed, but in vain. I will not be here about his economic mistakes and mistakes, but about the future from the very bell tower when I broadcast from it " great reformer"Nikita Sergeevich, under the slogans Down with Stalin. Everything would be fine, but Stalin was communism. There is no Stalin, there is no communism. Yes, then to the term" Marxism"term added" Leninism", and it was natural, because Lenin developed this theory and won. Not someone, but Lenin won. I described the theory of that victory, here I will say something else.

The CPSU killed Stalin and destroyed the communist theory in the world. It's not about lies, which became the basis for "exposing the cult", but about the fact that by exposing a certain cult, sabotage was carried out in relation to the teaching itself. Ideological collapse is the result of Khrushchev. But... it happened. What's next? Here, let's think.

I got distracted. Khrushchev chose. I chose the dumbest way out that I could think of. He did not get away from his crime at the congress, relying on the same Marxism and Leninism ... (And this could be done), but stupidly announced that from now on, there will be no dictatorship of the proletariat, because it has exhausted itself. Well, society ... and it will go to communism by 1980. Of course, no one was going to explain what communism is, or what will happen after 1980 (we will just live there) no one was going to explain. And it went...

Let's go. The ideologists of Marxism, who were so smart then, suddenly realized that it turns out that it is possible to receive social benefits without much mental effort, hiding behind a fig leaf of doctrine. I give lectures to the directors of state farms and chairmen of collective farms, and then, rubbing my hands and being considered a smart girl, I get those very benefits. And these benefits become calling card me as a person, all the more Khrushchev allowed the party to manage everything. Stalin then with Beria for what to " pillory"They printed stories? Precisely because they dared to push the party into secondary roles. Hence the strengthening of those authorities in the USSR that were party ones. Well, who did they bring up, you can see in full today on the same TV or in our Duma. ALL THEY ARE CHILDREN OF THE PARTY IN THE USSR!

Before us is a trend, as they say. Not from the simple to the complex, but from the complex to the simplest. Here time played a role, because it tends to flow quickly. Yesterday there was still school, and today it's already 50... and when to live? The kids and relatives of the smart ones realized this. Do rockets fly? Well, to hell with them, but Marxism feeds us well. This theory and let it be the theory that they also hated. The question is, why? The feeder. But because there is something that is a larger feeder in terms of scale, and since the USSR will not create a video tape recorder and a film 18+ (and what the hell is it? A cinema with a penny ticket is a culture of hoo what a height. leaving behind a leftover vomit), then you will have to feed this way and that, where possible. Pass" there"And stupidity will serve. And?

And it began. Marxism is bad, because in the West even the unemployed lives in a car...because I want five types of sausage, I eat one of the meat. I don't want it and that's it. To me, as a person, give me some views of kefir. Who will release it? And this is a different matter, whoever needs it and let it release ... Ie. noticed? Do you notice anything? THIS WAS SPOKEN AND WRITTEN BY THE ELITE OF THE COUNTRY! It was she who, canceling the article on parasitism in the USSR, said that the parasite will be able to live hoo, and this is not his personal dignity, but the state as a whole, because from now on, the one who sucks, he works, and the one who eats the sucker the state needs, and the level of its milking will be appreciated by the West and accepted. But what are we?

Any system has a hierarchy. The hierarchy of society (where the system of growing up with punishment as an educational part of the formation of a person is an integral part) is the salvation of mankind and the factor of survival, like a taboo in culture, is a factor in the salvation of the morality of mankind. The elite of society is always smarter than the citizens. In the end, what does Putinism present to us smart today? And here is a dead end! Not just a dead end, where the exit is one-or new road bridge or back up-dumbass!

The impasse is not that there is no clear answer where is going Russia. Not that there is no person at all in all these economic doctrines (where everything is put in the first place ... absolutely everything, and not a person. " Economic expediency" " Market relations "and other nonsense), and not even that in Russia the ideology of the bourgeois class is completely absent (hence the frank nonsense that is carried to the masses" connoisseurs"liberalism"), but in the fact that a simple layman from the electorate is ideologically smarter than a representative of power. Hence the lack of dialogue.

Think over what the government can say when it starts to broadcast, through its own tools of the information dictatorship, each of you. Your simplest argument that you present will confuse her, and she, developing an instinct for protection in the form of generally accepted answers that have not changed for decades, will be to you " sculpt humpback"... A striking example is the president's answers to questions. What do you think, are all fools in our country? No, of course, and nevertheless, not a single one got up and asked, they say, Vladimir Vladimirovich, instead of repeating a bunch of nonsense every time, would they take it and answer who in our country is responsible for issuing money? Is there something behind our money? Well, for example, such a trifle as my work and the result of my work ... I won’t talk about the gold and other content of the currency .. that we do not have such people who understand all these mechanisms? Someone would take it and ask, they say, Vladimir Vladimirovich, I sat on the net at my leisure and studied the biography of your personal environment .... sorry, you are going to raise it with him Russia from its knees? Why are you holding us for idiots?

So, no ideology, no elite, whose elitism is in that very chair in full view of the cameras on those very forums. Are you sitting there? So the elite! If you're not there, then you suck. That's the whole selection criterion. And this is fear! The layman cannot be smarter than the authorities. He is afraid to be smarter than the authorities. To be smarter than the authorities means to become a Bolshevik winner, because why do you need a mind? For yourself personally? Then congratulations, you lived your life in vain, my friend. How many times have I heard amazing dialogues, they say, we cannot know everything, and therefore, we must choose Putin, because he sees and accepts, understanding the hidden processes. I always reply to this that, while agreeing with this rubbish, I cannot understand why these same theses do not work when he / they evaluate democracy and the electoral system? What kind of metamorphosis is this?

The choice of power depends on you! Not only do you choose it without knowledge, but you DO NOT NEED the most mediocre knowledge in this system!

Gentlemen, as soon as you start thinking, Putinism does not disappear in a minute or a second. As soon as you start to grow wiser, Putinism not only has no future, it is both doomed and sentenced ... not by you, because you are an instrument-history, where you sit in the judge's chair.

Russian proverb, meaning: The deeper you dive into a problem, business, etc., the more subtleties and features that were hidden earlier, you discover.

Examples

(1860 - 1904)

"Vaudeville" (1884): "My wife is hysterical. The daughter declares that she is not able to live with such violent parents, and dresses to leave home. husband's head with lead lotions, and a private bailiff who draws up a protocol on the violation of public peace and tranquility.

"Sakhalin island"- "Cattle, as it is, is borrowed from the treasury and fed at the expense of the government. The further into the forest, the more firewood: all Arkovtsy owe, their debt grows with each new crop, with each extra head of cattle, and for some it already stretches to an unpaid figure - two or even three hundred rubles per capita.

(1809 - 1852)

(1831-1832), I - about Ivan Fedorovich Shponka:

“He was already almost fifteen years old when he moved to the second grade, where, instead of an abbreviated catechism and four rules of arithmetic, he set to work on a lengthy one, on a book on the positions of a person and on fractions. But, seeing that the further into the forest, the more firewood, and having received the news that the father ordered to live long, stayed for another two years and, with the consent of the mother, then joined the P *** infantry regiment.

With strange headlines appearing in Lately in Nasha Niva.

I can't believe my eyes!

After all, Nasha Niva has not been ours for a long time. But to wrap it up is incomprehensible to the mind!

However, if we take into account who orders the music, and add events to it recent months, everything is rendered.

The West finally changed tactics. He no longer needed the destroyers of the last outpost of the Soviet era. Their mission is over.

Due to the inertia of the working strata of the population, the electoral resource of the new plan, of course, remained the same. These are the intelligentsia, students and high school students.

The opposition also invented the main culprit of "our troubles and our evils" - this is Putin's Russia. On it, which is under sanctions, you can hang all the dogs, starting from Ivan the Terrible. Endure.

Now - at the suggestion of Dubovets - strangely enough, an ardent Russophobe of the perestroika and post-Soviet times, Zenon Poznyak, was added to her company.

What is the novelty of the approaches of the West and its henchmen to the dismantling of calm in our society?

A new task now is the earthing up of the same intelligentsia and youth on the sly. But without the cultivation of radical nationalist sentiments, but by creating intellectual platforms where fraternization with Russian liberals would become the norm.

After all, Cicerons have died out in our country, and Navalny and others are in plain sight in Russia.

I think that for this reason the opposition was gradually converted to Russian.

It is precisely this goal that explains the strange appearance and replication of quotes from the newly minted literary diva Svetlana Aleksievich, who spoke quite definitely:

“It was impossible to do what I did in the Belarusian language.”

And finally, the point. Finally, the main thing is that the puppeteers have a passionate desire to create, on the basis of the TUT.by portal, which has drastically changed its rhetoric, an intellectual platform for those who like to scratch their tongues with the involvement of the promoted liberalism abroad (read - Russian renegades).

They are, like no one else, close to us in mentality.

I won't be surprised if Shenderovich or the taciturn Savik Shuster show up as the hosts of these gatherings.

After all, he never said anything impartial to Lukashenka. Others spoke, and he, without visible emotions on his face, listened and did not assent.

But let's get back to Poznyak.

I can honestly say that I, like many others, have sympathy for this very bright propagandist, who managed to become the central figure of the Belarusian Popular Front in the late 80s, and then with small forces to saddle the Belarusian parliament and solve the priority tasks of gaining independence by the country.

The main thing: he is an ideological opponent of everything Soviet, but not a traitor. He does not count “Jewish pieces of silver” in his pocket, but bends his line, because he believes, because he is convinced that he is right and defends his point of view.

The West did not like the straightforwardness and independence of Poznyak's judgments, and he was relegated to the backyard of Russophobic politics.

He is not their man. They don't need people own opinion. They need performers.

So what is Poznyak accused of on the pages of Nasha Niva and Svaboda by the revolutionary Sergey Dubovets, widely known in narrow circles?

Neither more nor less - in the most important: "History of the Muggle would be classed in the past, kali b People's Front of the 90s will start again".

You see, then "nathnyaў priklad" Popular Front microscopic and quiet Estonia.

It was there, and not in Lithuania and Latvia with a huge number of Russians living, in his opinion, that the most successful pies were baked.

Maybe it was so, because in Estonia people did not die in skirmishes with special forces, and there was no particular need to torment the Russians. But Dubovets's claim that he allegedly mastered the situation in the post-Soviet space at that time and could determine priorities is highly doubtful.

Dubovets, who was then in euphoria “It was assumed that Belarus would be the earliest ever - fallow and so non-Belarusian, like the BSSR”.

But in Belarus, at first, she reigned on the throne "the highest dzyarzhau asoba"- Shushkevich. Poznyak and his comrades raged in parliament, then Lukashenka.

What line Dubovets was pursuing at that time is not very clear, because he was not in sight and only now emerged - with arguments about Poznyak's mistakes.

Further, he asks why everything didn’t go the way it did in Estonia, why we are not where Estonia is, and not the same as Estonia with its higher standard of living than in the post-Soviet space.

Let's not argue with Dubovets. He either does not understand, or consciously does not want to understand the difference in mentalities, the incompatibility production capacity and the scale of production relationships that characterize the economies of our countries.

He does not think about the current information, how many people left for the West from the Baltic republics in comparison with Belarus.

He is not interested in the state of the real sector of the economy and what are the prospects for the economic development of Estonia, etc.

For him, Estonia is a paradise, because “Didn’t the people attack the common and non-familiar Estonians there? And then, what did the People's Front recognize the Democrats? I tamu, that the yans adrazu took a course for independence - NATO - Europe?

The question is, was it different with us in the early 90s?

Is it possible that the Belarusian Popular Front was headed by the Party Genosse? Didn't US President Clinton come to us and give us a bench in Kurapaty?

After all, can a sane politician really believe that the path to "independence" lies through NATO membership?

In his rantings, Dubovets, of course, could not pass by "monaga torture."

He had 80 percent of the communists voting for the MOV, Soviet generals, even Yankovsky from the Russian Theater, but it’s to blame for the fact that not everyone spoke on it "Theatrical Radicalism" - “He is a mind-blower of that tiny adzinstva of Belarus, which was the first time of the language. The parallel with Estonia was evil.”

It's hard to even call it stupidity. After all, the impulse of the Belarusians for change at that time was not due to an irrepressible thirst to use the Belarusian language, but to the mistrust sown among the people in the authorities, Chernobyl fears and the infantilism of those who stood at the helm of the young republic.

Further, Dubovets claims that the split into the connected and the unconnected did not happen immediately after the formation of the Belarusian Popular Front, but after the election of the Supreme Council of the XII convocation. And the reason for this is Poznyak.

He's writing: “Adnachasov paўstala “elita” - menavita pavodle getai prykmety - syadomyh, geta znachytsy, lepshih for іnshіh, matsyorіh, lychy tho “Estonians”, yakiya “towered above the astatnіmi Belarusians”.

We've arrived.

After all, everyone remembers that this so-called "elite" began to emerge when it ran from one room to another under the name "Talaka".

She, the "elite", gained a breath when the sons of party workers realized that in the changed conditions, the chance to rise to the level of power of their fathers is presented only on the wave of national radicalism, and not obedience.

After all, even then life put the question point-blank: either - or. Tacking was not welcomed, since everyone was tired of it in perestroika times.

Further, Dubovets confirms the inertia of his own thinking:

“I spat 25 bastards, and maybe more, if we know how to be adventurous Belarusians - different, but that’s because all the trees in the oak forest are different.”

It turns out that the situation is not the same as it was before. There was a click: livability reigned in society and "Pamyarkounasts". (“Facebook” doesn’t count).

But this semblance of reconciliation is given for a reason. This is a run to kick Poznyak and his entourage again:

“And the tsyaper say - like the people pagodzitsa on the getki padzel, that we are Belarusians, but are there more Belarusian Belarusians? It is clear that the “large Belarusian” side of the “simple Belarusian” will meet with the abstraction.”

D left and Lukashenka. He, it turns out, “Take the language out of the hramadskaga Uzhytka,” because she “became the sign of the saints”, and suckers are Belarusians “Adchuval satysfaktsyyu hell tago, cab show “great Belarusians” Kuzkina mother.

Sami schools pravodzіlі debelarusіzatsyyu.

Well, just like Emelyushka: "The sledges go, they go by themselves, they go by themselves without a horse."

And this nationwide revolt, born of the radicalization of the saints, led to the fall of the Belarusian Popular Front as a powerful mass movement and contributed to “The establishment of the autaritar madela lady, because the people are “uncommon” and avtamatychny are subject to the palette, and the “elite” is the subject of the subject, closing in on the saba.”

What does the subjectivity of the people in politics mean and who prevented the "elite" from losing it, Dubovets did not chew, each time remembering the Estonia he loved.

In rare moments of enlightenment, he speaks the absolute truth:

“... a skinny Estonian will tell you who Lukashenka is, but only adzinki in Belarus guessing who the president of Estonia is there.”

And then nostalgic:

“... some people think so myself - eight of us, the host of all Belarusians, are open and all Belarusians, we call them yes to ourselves, the host of the race and the Armenians, the whole people are themselves.”

Let's digress for a moment and imagine what the result would be if Lenin and his entourage "maryli" or "clicked yes to yourself" in 1917?

The Bolsheviks were not infantile intellectuals. They were armed modern theory, strategy and tactics of thoughtful actions. They persistently, competently and purposefully carried out everyday work among the working people and soldiers and were successful.

On some spells and humiliation of the current government, revolutions in the minds of people are not made. And the aggravation of national issues in multinational republics is always fraught with slaughter. You don't have to look far for examples.

Thank God, Zenon Poznyak and the revolutionaries of the first wave, willy-nilly, but were brought up in a decent society. At that time, their hands did not itch to unleash fratricidal conflicts on very unstable national and linguistic grounds.

There was a controversy, broke ballpoint pens but not spears.

And here Dubovets is frankly disingenuous, stating that “Atrad musiў bazavatstsa on democratic padstavs. Never again on canservative and radical - ty, as a substitute for pashyrennya patrabavali, naadvarot, the sound of an elite atrada and nyaspynnaya pure joy. Why is it safe and hello.

After all, we remember very well: the entire opposition was not at all engaged in a detailed study of the strategy for returning the country's economy to a stable position, but hit in search of the future in the past on the basis of nationalistic sentiments alien to people.

Surely the same Dubovets tore his shirt for "moving and relaxing the hell of balshevism" instead of agitation for a national consensus and the translation of public controversy into the mainstream of economic problems and ways to solve them.

The excuse for our national humanitarians, who did not understand anything in the economy, was "the way to Europe". As if they were waiting for us with impatience and without us they would not have a life.

At the end of his story, Dubovets sincerely admits his thoughtlessness:

“On that, as the geta understands, a bunch of nasty things and pastupovy exodus of the “fellow Belarusians” were spat - in others, there are light in the other country, and in the other grooves.”

However, even today his reasoning has not received at least some kind of replenishment with new ideas and does not go further than “monoga torment”.

He states that "Znikla self-proclaimed"elite of large belarusian belarusians", svyadomyh ”, - but, like a woodpecker, remains true to the former standard, with which he associates timid hopes: “... can we know ourselves to be with the Estonians, why is this magic waste unstoppable?”

And Dubovets's confession, without admitting his own miscalculations, naturally caused a resonance in the opposition community.

It should be noted that many of the arguments of the participants in the discussion look quite sound.

For example, someone under the nickname "Svyatoma", talking about Poznyak, declares:

“I could not, in 1994, have a perekanaўchuyu podtrymka among the community ... I would have been the forest of Gamsakhurdy near Georgia ... I could have managed to do this, because I could farm a well-organized vertical and garyzantal, near Shushkevich’s hell.”

“... a bunch of people who acted Rukhaўtsаў have grown up “everything, it’s broken on the right, the political system of publicity is necessary and ab syabe think”, the work of the business has rushed to work, svyadomyya - the celebration of siberia from a wide fractional gap parliamentarian (there were only members of the Belarusian Popular Front) , began to labiravatsya piles of ulasny іntaresy: some pasada, some kavalak lands near the adpachynka zone, some issued their creators for dzarzhany kosht, some uvogulle zehaў near Lithuania, kabzhytsi near the old Belarusian capital.

“Mae ratsiyu” and someone “Benedzikt”:

“Such for the abmerkavan and vymushany zaўvazhyts - not abmyarkoўvaetstsa adna overestimate an important problem (it looks like the menavita yana “incited” Dubaўets (and not only yago) to write the getaga aburalnaga article).

Prychana Palyagae ў offensive - Agulnaviadoma, scandal to the Avanturai - the facts of the abyabrans, fanned by subpoSa “govravoda” і ildami “limearami” plow -a -nye dzeachoi at the Vachas of Sheragova Apazy.

The fact that the Kazakh Z. Paznyak ab dzeynasts of pseudo-apocalytic structures was justified”.

What can you say? Everything is correct. The way it is.

We must pay tribute to Poznyak. Despite all his recent miscalculations, he is the only significant figure who does not compromise principles and does not wag his tail in front of those who call the music.

If it nervous system did not resonate with the Ukrainian events, which in no way correspond to his own ideas of good and evil, he could become not an outrageous leader of alternative thinking, but a real Belarusian politician who has no need to fight the windmills of communism - they are already in the past.

In conclusion, I wanted to write something smart, but one expression of Dubovets caused a smile and threw off the desire to crush water in a mortar:

“... all tree trees and oak dachshunds are different, only the needles of yana hell getaga are not shy. The first sign of such a sign is an oak, dubeishy for other oaks is not the main thing for a primordial”.

It seems that Dubovets told the truth. But, as you know, in every process there are exceptions.

Today "Oakest for other oaks" is still there.

A selection of scary comics in the setting of rural America.

Fans of the horror genre are familiar with the oppressive atmosphere of American forests firsthand. You don't have to look far for examples: you can think of both classics like Sam Raimi's Evil Dead and Drew Goddard's experimental Cabin in the Woods.

However, not only filmmakers turned to this setting, but also many comic book authors, with key works which this collection will introduce you. You can find more material about comics in my

Hillbilly by Eric Powell

Eric Powell - creator of the legendary comic book goon. Having completed the epic saga, the author changed course to more local stories in your new fantasy universe. Stern-looking protagonist mysterious origin who travels the world and encounters evil spirits from myths and legends. Doesn't it remind you of anything? Analogies with Hellboy suggest themselves, but already in the first issue it becomes obvious that the comics are different both in spirit and in execution.

During the creation of The Goon, Powell practiced writing and drawing, reaching a high level at Hillbilly. Drawing inspiration from the folklore of the Appalachians, the author uses a characteristic mountainous accent in the dialogues to give the work authenticity.

In this comic, he moved away from the long plot novel with many characters and swirling lines, focusing on short but captivating plots. Main character loves to listen, tell and discuss stories. At the same time, as in life, stories change from narrator to narrator, offering the reader to decide for himself: what is true and what is fiction.

To convey the mood, Powell actively works with colors: the main part of the world is done in muted yellow-brown hues, sharp pencil lines, like a rough sketch in a notebook. At the same time, the author has an impressive set fine styles without turning the comic into a dull yellow mess. Powell likes to work with a mythological bestiary: here you have many-faced wolves, and insidious witches, familiar trolls and Appalachian creatures that you hardly heard of before.

All in all, a great story that combines a unique fantasy universe with horror elements and great dialogues about repentance, love spells and stupid people.

Harrow County by Cullen Bunn & Tyler Crook

A teenage and sometimes rather naive comic that tells, among other things, about the problems of growing up. The story of Harrow County is dedicated to the conflict between a girl and the villagers, who are sure that she is the next incarnation of a once-killed powerful witch. Trying to prove my innocence main character finds out that he really has a connection with supernatural beings.

After this, the plot of the work begins to develop rapidly, and many minor characters. Cullen Bunn, far from being the most talented screenwriter, does surprisingly well in Harrow County. He is especially good at inflating horror, which he creates with the help of a simple formula: several pages are spent on an eyeliner to a spread, where the next monster appears in all its disgusting ugliness. A kind of analogue of screamers from the cinema.

But the main star of the comic is artist Tyler Crook, who is best known for his work on B.P.R.D. The ability and love to draw monsters and "body horror" is what sets Harrow County authors apart from the rest. Aside from the hordes of evil spirits that range from skinless little boys to gigantic demons, the comic is littered with nauseating moments, like people with mutilated faces, rotten food full of larvae, and, of course, a large number blood.

Freaks In The Heartland by Steve Niles & Greg Ruth

A slow, moving story about the importance and, at the same time, the depravity of family ties, about the deeply wounded and miserable - all this through the prism of a closed community.

Greg Root, a comic book artist known among other things for his illustrations based on Twin Peaks, masterfully coped with the transfer of the viscous atmosphere of the work. Autumnal, muddy tones are perfect for depicting the countryside: dilapidated barns, boundless fields and withered trees. With each frame you plunge into the abyss of hopelessness, saturated with hatred and fear.

Although the general outline of the universe is understated and many elements remain behind the scenes, ignoring the questions of the reader, the comic focuses on the two-faced nature family ties. It is more interesting for the authors to talk about the ambiguous moral essence of deformity, where the absence of physical defects does not make you a good person.

Moonshine by Brian Azarello & Eduardo Risso

Another work of the famous duo responsible for the crime comic 100 Bullets. Without parting with gangsters, the authors add a pinch of horror and supernatural monsters to their new creation.

Moonshine will tell you a lot with its ambiguous name: coveting excellent moonshine, polished gentlemen in jackets and with Thompson machine guns send their man to West Virginia in order to make a deal and establish a supply of alcohol. As a result, the hero is faced with a family clan of proud werewolves who do not need partners.

By setting the story in forests and swamps, Azarello gives complete carte blanche to Risso, emphasizing his irresistible love of contrast. Having got rid of the contours, the artist enthusiastically depicts shadows that replace objects, buildings and even entire backgrounds. Whether it's a lurking werewolf in the thicket, a languid gaze of a character or a half-empty room, the artist invariably draws the frame in twilight.

In addition to the amazing drawing and monsters with bloody mouths, the comic contains reflections on the theme of loss - one of the main leitmotifs of Brian Azarrello. The main character who lost native person, with every step deep into the wilderness, risks losing himself, lost forever in the madness of moonlight.

Hellboy The Crooked Man by Mike Mignola & Richard Corben

While traveling through 1950s Virginia, the cult demon witnesses the intervention of otherworldly forces, teams up with a local redneck, and both of them try to find out what is even going on here.

Mike Mignola himself is not responsible for the drawing, but the legendary author and artist Richard Corben, who specializes in the horror genre and is known for his characteristic style expressed in the grotesque masculinity of the characters. This time, instead of muscular monsters, Korben surrounds readers with endless tracts of coniferous forests. The stunning beauty of the original landscape in Richard's rough, sloppy drawing captivates and points to the sinister secrets hidden in the depths of untouched nature.

While the drawing most effectively conveys the aesthetics of one-story America, with all its dilapidated chapels in the wilderness and wooden shacks inhabited by witches, the story focuses on the motives of return: returning home, to the roots, family reunion. Hellboy here serves as a silent observer, often remaining in the shadows or at the edge of the frame, giving way to damned little people who want to find peace in this dead earth.

In general, comics are a very difficult medium for horror: the specificity of the image of frames and the absence of sounds pushes Mignola and Corben not to use standard “boo” moments and regular images of defiant elements on the pages of a comic, but to consistently build a pressure atmosphere.

Gradually, page after page, the heroes plunge into the abyss of witches' machinations, lose their comrades-in-arms and all hope of redemption. When it's all over, the reader will remember for a long time the silent expanses of mountains, dense forests and the devil's crooked grin.

The material has been edited

As Sherlock Holmes said, by a drop of water a person who thinks and thinks logically can draw conclusions about the existence of the Black Sea or Niagara Falls, even if he has never seen either one or the other in his life. It's about that any action has results in the future, if there is a cause, then there is a consequence.

This is the meaning of the proverb "the forest is cut - the chips fly." True, its meaning shows that the consequence is not always positive.

What do flying chips mean?

Imagine that there is a felling of the forest. Trees fall one after another, and in the process dust rises, chips of damaged wood fly in all directions. It’s good if they don’t hurt anyone, but such a chip can hurt and blind. When they say "the forest is cut - the chips fly", the meaning is as follows: in order to achieve a good and desired result, you may have to suffer a little damage from the chips. But it is not comparable to a more global and colossal goal - the resulting wood. In the Ukrainian language there is a proverb similar in meaning. It sounds like this: "where it's borosno - there it's powdery", which can be translated as "where there is flour - it's always dusty there."

Another meaning of this proverb, more economic, is that flying chips are a small but mandatory production cost.

There would be no happiness, but misfortune helped

The meaning of the proverbs "they cut the forest - the chips fly" and "there would be no happiness, but misfortune helped" is opposite in meaning, although they are often confused. So, in the first case, it means that on the way to achieving a good, and most importantly, the desired result, you may have to endure negative consequences. In the second case, it means that sometimes a trouble that has come can lead to good, unpredictable and unexpected consequences. Sometimes people get confused about the meaning of these two sayings and misuse them.

Another meaning of the proverb "the forest is cut - the chips fly"

Eat interesting guess that this proverb refers to larger concepts, such as entire nations. How to understand "the forest is cut - the chips fly" in this case? Thus, a forest can be associated with a people or a nation in the process of change (cutting down the forest). Sometimes these changes are quite positive and bring something good, but any changes will cause innocent victims. In this case, chips are understood as human broken destinies.

Synonymous saying about causality

The meaning of the proverbs "the forest is cut - the chips fly" and "without breaking the eggs, do not fry the eggs" is close in meaning. In both cases, it is understood that on the way to a great and good goal one cannot do without concessions and possible inconveniences. But if in a conversation about logging wood chips are an optional and not very significant factor, then in the case of scrambled eggs, it means that without sacrifices for the good ( broken eggs) not enough.

Many mistakenly consider the meaning of the proverbs "the forest is cut - the chips fly" and "the farther into the forest - the more firewood" is the same, because in the first and second cases we are talking about the forest and trees. But it is not so. The second saying implies that any business in the process of execution can bring more and more surprises, and the further you go, the more trouble you may encounter.

Summarizing

The Russian language is rich not only in words, but also in phraseological units, popular expressions, sayings and proverbs. Using them, you saturate your speech, make it even more colorful and rich, and also show your intellectual level with dignity. At the same time, it is important to use the right phrases to the place, otherwise you will goof off, instead of flashing your mind. Now, knowing the correct meaning of the proverbs "they cut the forest - the chips fly", "without breaking the eggs, do not fry the fried eggs", "the farther into the forest - the more firewood", you can use them to the point.

The figurative meaning of the proverb further into the forest - more firewood

Andrey Martin

The figurative meaning is not connected with the FOREST ... You can bring a synonymous chain FOREST - DEBRI - PROBLEMS (TASKS). FIREWOOD - SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM That is, the meaning becomes this: the more you solve problems, study any issue, the more new problems appear, tasks that require new solutions ... I like Murphy's Law on this topic "The solution of one task (problem) entails the emergence of many other unsolved tasks (problems)"... I am a programmer, so this law or saying can be applied to me approximately in the meaning of "Identification of one error in program entails an increase in the number of undetected errors :-)" this saying can be applied everywhere

What does it mean, the further into the forest, the more firewood?)))

Landscape

The further you get into problems, the bigger and bigger they become.
the further you delve into the situation, the more unexpected moments arise. I reason on the basis of the fact that there is an expression "to break firewood", which is probably older than this saying.

Sergey kropachev

and what is the saying, when you enter the forest, it is not difficult to go, but the farther, the more difficult, thickets. but in life, you stir up some business, at first it seems like nothing, and then it turns out that there are a lot of problems, the further, the more.

Natalia Kondratskaya

Approximately the same as "not knowing the ford - do not get into the water" or "the less you know - you sleep better and live longer" undertook to help someone and failed, but harmed).

Where does the proverb come from - the farther into the forest the more firewood?

⊰ ðеȴmƴ ⊱

The further into the forest, the more firewood.
THAN (WHAT) FURTHER IN THE LES, THE (THAT) MORE. The more you go into any affairs, delve into problems, the more surprises or difficulties arise that are not easy to overcome. The proverb is actually Russian, recorded from the 17th-18th centuries. : Farther into the forest, more firewood; The further into the forest, the more firewood. In the Polish language, apparently, Russianism: Im dale / wlas, tym wiecejdrzew. ffl My wife is in hysterics. The daughter declares that she is unable to live with such exuberant parents and dresses to leave home. The further into the forest, the more firewood. It ends with the fact that the important guest finds the doctor on the stage applying lead lotions to the head of her husband. (A. Chekhov. Vaudeville). Will there be an end, will the time come when with a light heart you can say to yourself * everything you wanted done, achieved what you wanted? Hardly. The further into the forest, the more firewood. (V. Tendryakov. Behind the running day). * The apotheosis of this "process" was the exit from common union writers of the Bondarevsky joint venture of the RSFSR; then followed the convocation of an extraordinary congress of the same Bondarev wing of the SP RSFSR. Opponents of their own, their meetings and plenums of Vl. Gusev dubbed it "Parade of informers". Ie-zh! Raise your shoulder - swing your arm ... Further into the forest - more firewood: the Bondarev secretariat is resolutely closing the Union of Writers of the USSR, since it "ceased to exist",. Simple and clear. (B. Mozhaev. Passion-muzzle. Literary newspaper. 09/25/91). After this [accrual], the salary goes from the region to your hometown. The further into the forest, the slower the money "sneaks". (Arguments and facts, No. 45. 1996). Wed : Further out to sea - more grief; Further into the dispute - more words.

How to write a fairy tale according to the proverb "The farther into the forest, the more firewood"?

How to write a fairy tale according to the proverb "The farther into the forest, the more firewood" for grade 2?

Galina vasilna

A woman and her two sons lived in the same village. The children were not big, but at home they could already help. One day, my mother left for work, and before leaving she asked her sons to go into the forest, bring brushwood:

My dear sons, do not go far into the forest, do not take too much brushwood. So that you yourself are not very tired and do not tear your hands.

Mom left, and the sons dressed warmer, took a sled, a rope and went to the forest. They came from the edge, looked around, it seemed to them that there was not enough brushwood here. We went further into the forest. It is true, the further they went into the forest, the more firewood they found. It can be seen from the edge of the others cut down, but not everyone went into the thicket. The guys chopped firewood, tied to the sled. We tried, I wanted to please my mother and prepare more brushwood. Only when we set off on the return journey, the heavily loaded sledges either fall into the snow, or cling to the bushes, or fall on their side.

It’s hard to drag, the guys are tired, and it’s still very far from home. After all, they went into the forest light, and back with loaded sleds.

The guys see that it is already evening, but they can’t get out of the forest in any way. Then they removed half of the firewood from the sled, tied it up again and hurried home. They walk along the road and think: but my mother said not to go far. After all, even along the edge of the forest it was possible to collect the firewood that fit on their sled. You don't always have to go far for what you can't carry.