A complete description of Chatsky grief from the mind. The image and character of Chatsky's characterization in the comedy Woe from Wit (Griboedov A

Woe from Wit

3. The problem of the mind in the comedy Woe from Wit

4. Chatsky and Molchilain (comparative characteristics)

5. My favorite character

4) Does the country need smart people; what is the tragedy smart people in the comedy "Woe from Wit" .....

I need an essay on one of these topics:
1. "Chatsky - winner or loser"
2. Chatsky spokesman for the ideas of his time.
3. Barskaya Moscow in Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit"
4. What are the dangers of silence.
5. "The current century and the past century"
6. Author and hero in Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit".
If anyone has an essay on one of these topics please reply. If it's good, with a plan and I don't find a copy, I'll pay 40 points

unsolved to the end "(A. Blok)

The comedy "Woe from Wit" was written between 1815 and 1820. The content of the play is closely related to historical events that time in Russia. The work remains relevant today. In those days, there were defenders of serfdom and Decembrists in society, imbued with love for the Motherland, opposing violence against individuals.

The comedy describes the clash of two centuries: "the present century" with the "past century". A prime example the old time is the so-called Famus society. These are acquaintances and relatives of Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov, a wealthy Moscow gentleman, in whose house the play takes place. These are Khlestova, the spouses Gorichi, Skalozub, Molchalin and others. All these people are united by one point of view on life. They are all cruel feudal lords, they consider human trafficking to be a normal phenomenon. Serfs save their lives and honor, sincerely serve, and they can exchange them for a pair of greyhounds. So at the ball at Famusov's, Khlestova tells Sofya to give a sop from dinner for her arapka - a girl and a dog. She sees no difference between them. This remains relevant today. When a rich person who has power and money can humiliate another person who is lower in level. The ideals for today's society are rich people, in ranks. Famusov cites Kuzma Petrovich as an example to Chatsky, who was a respectable chamberlain, "with a key", "rich and was married to a rich woman." Pavel Afanasyevich wants for his daughter such a groom as Skalozub, because he "both a golden bag and aims for generals."

All representatives Famus Society characterizes an indifferent attitude to affairs. Famusov, the "manager in a state-owned place," deals with business only once; at Molchalin's insistence, he signs papers, despite the fact that "there is a contradiction in them and a lot of weekly." He believes - "signed, so off your shoulders." The saddest thing is that nowadays people think in exactly the same way as Famusov. Attitude to work, almost all irresponsible. This is the unsurpassed great comedy, it remains vital, relevant in the 20th century.

The main character of the play is Chatsky, through whom the author expresses his progressive ideas. He opposes the senseless imitation of everything foreign. He wants to punish those around him that they are obliged to love and respect Russian culture. Chatsky says that a Frenchman from Bordeaux, who came to Moscow, did not hear "a word of a Russian" and did not see "a Russian face" here. The comedy "Woe from Wit" is the only one in world literature, since no one except Griboyedov reveals the whole reality of the events taking place.

In the comedy, Chatsky is declared crazy because the representatives of the Famus society do not understand his ideas. He alone does not want to put up with the humiliation of people over people. Chatsky failed to correctly prove the correctness of his beliefs and still cannot reveal the secret. Comedy remains unsolved because humanity blindly follows life events not wanting to change anything.

A) compliance with the "role" system
B) quantity actors- more than twenty
C) the system of images is based on the principle of typification
D) lack of division of characters into positive and negative
D) introduction of off-stage characters
5. Correlate the comedy hero and the role to which he corresponds:
A) Chatsky
1) a father who is unaware of his daughter's love
B) Famusov
2) a lucky hero-lover
B) Sophia
3) soubrette
D) Lisa
4) the heroine of a love triangle
D) Molchalin
5) hero reasoner
6. Match the name of the hero and the role he plays in the comedy:
A) Khryumins, Tugoukhovskys, Khlestov
1) main characters
B) Prince Fedor, Kuzma Petrovich, Maxim Petrovich
2) minor
C) Chatsky, Sofia, Molchalin, Famusov
3) episodic
D) G.D.-G.N.
4) image-parody
D) Skalozub, Lisa, Zagoretsky, Gorich, Repetilov
5) off-stage characters
E) Repetilov
6) heroes. Necessary for the connection of the stage action
7. Mark the main means of creating satirical characters in comedy:
Individualization of language, aphorism, tragic pathos, author's remark, hyperbole, farcical details,
catharsis, phraseological units, dramatism, vernacular, irony, sarcasm.
8. Name the hero of the comedy "Woe from Wit", whose speech is aphoristic, the influence of the manner of speaking of other heroes is noticeable, the literary and colloquial forms of speech are intertwined, there are features of servility:
A) Molchalin B) Repetilov C) Zagoretsky D) Lisa
9. Combine off-stage characters related to the "current century" and "past century":
Prince Fyodor, Maxim Petrovich, three of the tabloid faces, Tatyana Yurievna, cousin Puffer, Baron von
Klotz, a Frenchman from Bordeaux, young people - "who travels, who lives in the countryside", Kuzma Petrovich, Sophia's aunt.
11. Where does Khlestova live:
A) on Tverskaya B) on the Kuznetsk bridge C) on Pokrovka D) at the Nikitsky gate
12. Whose portrait is this:
Curly! Hump ​​of the shoulder blade!
Angry! All cat tricks!
How black! Yes, how terrible!
A) Khlestov
B) Princess Maria Alekseevna
B) Hryumina
D) arapki

Article menu:

In the literature, the appearance of heroes who are ahead of their time, being incomprehensible and not accepted by modern society, is not uncommon.

At first it seems that this phenomenon is exclusively literary and has nothing to do with real life does not, but in fact it is misconception. The appearance of such people at the turn of the century or during crisis periods of development is a frequent occurrence, but it is rather difficult to fully analyze such individuals being in the same time period with them. They, on the general background, look eccentric and strange. Their position is always contrary to generally accepted principles and therefore sometimes it seems that they are on the verge of insanity and common sense.

The logic of their actions and positions can be analyzed based on the further development of history and culture. This process is easy to translate into reality if we have before us not a living person, but a work of art, moreover, written several tens or even hundreds of years ago. In this case, we can assess the significance of the position of a particular character.

"Extra" Chatsky

With the image of Chatsky, such a concept as “an extra person” is inseparable. This term has Russian roots. The first manifestation of this phenomenon was discovered literary critics and scientists in the image of the protagonist of Pushkin's novel "Eugene Onegin". Based on the position of literary critics, such a hero is always higher in terms of his level of education and talents than everyone around him. His potential is so limitless and diverse that he fails to embody himself in any of the activities. He is constantly in search of the meaning of life, but cannot find it, therefore he spends his strength and skill on all sorts of little things in life - revelry, balls, duels - in a word, on everything that brings pleasure or is the brainchild of passion. Such characters bring suffering to others (mainly women), break the fate of many people, sometimes even those closest to them, and become the cause of death. They do not see misconduct in their actions - they perceive what happened impartially.

To some extent, this position is akin to Chatsky - he also seems to us torn from another era, looking for his destiny and has extraordinary potential. His distinguishing feature from the “extra person” is that Chatsky does not bring such drastic destruction to society or its individual representatives, he does not die, as is customary for similar characters at the end of the story, but simply leaves a society alien to him.

Based on this difference, scientific literature Chatsky is called a harbinger of an extra person. The concept of such a type of heroes is important for understanding the whole picture of the whole image and actions of the hero - the character periodically acts negatively, not because he is poorly educated, but because, under the pressure of society and his inner peace another product of activity and reaction to the environment is impossible for him.

Chatsky's prototypes

Prototypes are common in the literature. Sometimes the relationship between the hero of the story and the real an existing person prosaic, sometimes it is difficult to find a prototype due to the little fame of a person. In the case of Chatsky, two people were the prototypes: Peter Chaadaev and Wilhelm Kuchelbecker.

The first publicist and philosopher in his activity (as he himself claimed, "a Christian philosopher"). The second is a poet, friend and classmate of Pushkin. Both Chaadaev and Kuchelbeker were active public figures, vehemently and sharply criticizing the authorities and orders - this position makes them related to Chatsky. Griboyedov's contemporaries have repeatedly spoken out about the similarity, even external, with Chaadaev. The philosopher of the 19th century was considered by many to be crazy (like the Famus society of Chatsky) and they tried in every possible way to survive this sharply sarcastic person from their range.

Biography

Griboedov gives the reader scant information about the biographical data of the protagonist. It is important for the author to show not the process of his formation as a person, but a sharp criticism of an aristocratic society, its habits and principles.

But, nevertheless, about some points life path Griboyedov briefly tells his main character.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - a nobleman by birth His parents died when he was still a child. A friend of his father, Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov, took the boy to his upbringing. For some time, Chatsky was brought up and educated together with Famusov's daughter, Sophia. Having matured, the young man begins to live separately. He is quite an enviable groom in his possession of the estate with 300 - 400 serfs. After some time, Chatsky goes abroad. After three years, Alexander Andreevich returns to Russia and visits the house of Pavel Afanasyevich, dear to him. It is this place that becomes the background for the unfolding of the main events in the future.

Separation from the Motherland and people close to him had a nostalgic effect on Chatsky - everything related to childhood and youth is sweet and dear to him. Neither Famusov nor Sophia experience such joy from his arrival - their joy is more ostentatious than sincere. They pay attention to him so as not to look ignorant in the eyes of others. Their joy is just a sign of decency.

In the further course of events, this situation is aggravated - the appearance of Chatsky becomes a test for everyone. The fact is that Alexander Andreevich always has some kind of taunt or caustic remark in reserve. Nobody wants to receive such a pleasant message in their address, even if it has a real basis. The desire to look virtuous in the eyes of others takes over from aristocrats. Chatsky always finds something to cling to - bribery, resolving issues thanks to friendly ties and kinship, theft - this is not full list main problems modern society.

Chatsky hopes that his love for Sophia will help him realize himself in family life, but this hope is not realized - the girl plays with feelings young man but actually loves someone else.

More, complaisant in nature, able to make a compliment at the right time, to suck up. Sophia does not care much about the reasons for such an attitude of her lover towards her, she seriously thinks that this is a manifestation of love. In fact, the reason for such reverence for her is material base her father. Molchalin, in whom Sophia does not have a soul, does not love her, but suffers and pleases only in order to improve her financial situation. Chatsky cannot come to terms with such orders - in his monologues he repeatedly claims that the aristocracy has ceased to be guided by the principles of morality. She is only interested in a way to line her pockets.

Rumors spread by Sophia about Chatsky's insanity aggravate the situation. Alexander Andreevich has no choice but to go away.

Chatsky's appearance

Alexander Sergeevich does not give an exact description of the appearance of the heroes of the comedy "Woe from Wit". The image of Chatsky is no exception. About him appearance, clothing style and physique we can tell from reviews of him and brief hints about the personality of others acting characters.

Based on the general opinion, Alexander Andreevich is a person of pleasant appearance, without any flaws.

In the comedy, Chatsky gives recommendations to Platon Mikhailovich Gorich on the subject of riding a horse and active pastime. This fact allows us to conclude that Alexander Andreevich himself is not alien to such an attitude towards leisure, it is likely that he is a man of a slender complexion.

Famusov, who first saw Chatsky after a three-year separation, notes that he is a dandy, that is, a man who dresses in fashion.

Thus, Alexander Andreevich is not without cute, pleasant features. He, like all people of his age, is interested in equestrian sports and fashion trends in terms of clothing. Chatsky - unique character comedy, he is not deprived negative qualities character, but they are explained by the influence of society on him. Being "prickly" is the only way for him to protect himself from the madness of the aristocracy.

Characteristics of Chatsky in the comedy "Woe from Wit" by Griboedov: description, biography of the hero

Chatsky's education

"He writes and translates well."

Chatsky's speeches are so correctly composed that it seems that he does not speak, but writes. The advanced views of the young man are not similar to the positions of representatives of the Famusov circle. It is knowledge and the desire for self-improvement that distinguish Alexander Andreevich from other heroes of the work. Famusov sees the reason for Alexander's behavior in education:

"Learning is the plague,
Learning is the reason…”

Inconsistency of character

Mind and categorical. The intellect of the hero does not prevent him from being tactless. He does not analyze his judgments, is not afraid to ridicule the defenseless. They cannot answer him in the same way, as they are limited in mental capabilities. Justifies behavior young nobleman only statements against immorality. With categorical judgments, he tries to fight it. But, as a smart person, he could understand that he was talking in vain. His statements do not reach those to whom they are directed. At times it just shakes the air. It seems that this is a conversation with oneself. It was this quality that A. Pushkin did not like. He believes that throwing pearls in front of the Repetilovs is not the business of smart people.

Love and passion. Another contradiction is the feelings of the hero. He is in love with a girl who chose another. And it's hard to even compare them. Love made Chatsky blind. Passion and desire to find out to whom he was preferred, compared him with the funny characters of a comedy ball. I want the hero to leave the stage with his head held high, and he just runs away from those who slandered him and spread gossip.

Hero's love of freedom

• military service;
• work as an official.

"The mind has put the mind into science ...".
“In the soul ... a fever for creative, lofty and beautiful arts.”

Truthfulness is the main character trait. The hero everywhere gets to the truth, whatever it may be. It was freedom of thought, liberalism that allowed him to be led into the category of madmen.

Chatsky's weaknesses

Sharpness of judgment. Angry - intonation changes:

"a menacing look, and a sharp tone."

"... you are all proud!"

"For once in my life, I'll pretend."

Patriotism Chatsky

Alexander Andreevich, like the entire advanced part of society, loves Russians, appreciates the people as they are.

Comedy "Woe from Wit" A.S. Griboyedov occupies a special place in the history of Russian literature. It combines the features of outgoing classicism with new artistic methods: realism and romanticism. In this regard, literary critics note the features of the image of the heroes of the play. If in the comedy of classicism before that all the characters were clearly divided into good and bad, then in Woe from Wit Griboedov, bringing the characters closer to real life, endows them with both positive and negative qualities. Such is the image of Chatsky's main character in the play "Woe from Wit".

The background of the protagonist of the play "Woe from Wit"

In the first act, Alexander Andreevich Chatsky returns from a long journey around the world, where he went to "look for the mind." He, without stopping home, arrives at Famusov's house, because he is driven by sincere love for the daughter of the owner of the house. They were once brought up together. But now they did not see each other for three long years. Chatsky does not yet know that Sophia's feelings for him have cooled down, and her heart is occupied by others. Love affair subsequently gives rise to a social clash between Chatsky, a nobleman of advanced views, and the Famus society of feudal lords and clergymen.

Even before Chatsky appears on the stage, we learn from Sophia's conversation with the maid Lisa that he is "sensitive, and cheerful, and sharp." It is noteworthy that Lisa remembered this hero when the conversation turned to the mind. It is the mind that is the feature that distinguishes Chatsky from the rest of the characters.

Contradictions in the character of Chatsky

If we trace the development of the conflict between the main character of the play "Woe from Wit" and the people with whom he is forced to interact, we can understand that Chatsky's character is ambiguous. Arriving at Famusov’s house, he began a conversation with Sophia by asking about her relatives, using a caustic tone and sarcasm: “Did your uncle jump back his eyelid?”
Indeed, in the play “Woe from Wit”, the image of Chatsky represents a rather quick-tempered, in some moments tactless young nobleman. Throughout the play, Sophia reproaches Chatsky for his habit of ridiculing the vices of other people: “The slightest strangeness in whom is barely visible, your wit is immediately ready.”

His harsh tone can only be justified by the fact that the hero is sincerely outraged by the immorality of the society in which he finds himself. Fighting her is a matter of honor for Chatsky. For him, it is not the goal to prick the interlocutor. He asks Sophia in surprise: “... Are my words really all sharp? And tend to harm someone? The fact is that all the issues raised resonate in the soul of the hero, he cannot control his emotions, his indignation. He has "mind and heart out of tune." Therefore, the hero squanders his eloquence even on those who are clearly not ready to accept his arguments. A.S. Pushkin, after reading the comedy, spoke about this as follows: “The first sign smart person- to know at a glance who you are dealing with, and not to throw pearls in front of the Repetilovs ... "And I.A. Goncharov, on the contrary, believed that Chatsky's speech was "boiling with wit."

The peculiarity of the worldview of the hero

The image of Chatsky in the comedy "Woe from Wit" largely reflects the worldview of the author himself. Chatsky, like Griboedov, does not understand and does not accept the slavish admiration of Russian people for everything foreign. In the play, the tradition of inviting foreign teachers to the house to raise children is repeatedly ridiculed by the protagonist: “... Today, just like in ancient times, they are busy recruiting regiments of teachers, more in number, at cheaper prices.”

Chatsky has a special relationship with the service. For Famusov, Chatsky's opponent in Griboyedov's comedy Woe from Wit, his attitude to the hero is determined by the fact that he "does not serve, that is, in that ... he does not find any benefit." Chatsky, on the other hand, clearly indicates his position on this issue: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.”

That is why Chatsky speaks with such anger about the habit of the Famus society to treat disadvantaged people with contempt and curry favor with influential people. If for Famusov his uncle Maxim Petrovich, who fell on purpose at a reception at the empress to please her and the court, is a role model, then for Chatsky he is just a jester. He does not see among the conservative nobility those from whom it would be worth taking an example. Enemies free life, "passionate for ranks", prone to wastefulness and idleness - this is who the old aristocrats are for the protagonist of the comedy "Woe from Wit" Chatsky.

Chatsky is also annoyed by the desire of the old Moscow nobles to make useful contacts everywhere. And they attend balls for this purpose. Chatsky prefers not to mix business with fun. He believes that everything should have its place and time.

In one of his monologues, Chatsky expresses dissatisfaction with the fact that as soon as a young man appears among the nobles who wants to devote himself to the sciences or the arts, and not to the pursuit of ranks, everyone begins to fear him. And they are afraid of such people, to whom Chatsky himself belongs, because they threaten the well-being and comfort of the nobles. They bring new ideas into the structure of society, but the aristocrats are not ready to part with the old way of life. Therefore, the gossip about the madness of Chatsky, launched by Sophia, turned out to be very useful. This made it possible to make his monologues safe and disarm the enemy of the conservative views of the nobles.

Feelings and features of the inner experiences of the hero

When characterizing Chatsky in the comedy "Woe from Wit", you can pay attention to his last name. She is speaking. Initially, this hero bore the surname Chadsky, from the word "Chad". This is related to the fact that main character is, as it were, in a daze of his own hopes and upheavals. Chatsky in the comedy "Woe from Wit" is experiencing a personal drama. He came to Sophia with certain hopes that did not come true. Moreover, the beloved preferred Molchalin to him, who is clearly inferior to Chatsky in intelligence. Chatsky is also burdened by being in a society whose views he does not share, which he is forced to resist. The hero is in constant tension. By the end of the day, he finally understands that his paths have diverged both with Sophia and with the Russian conservative nobility. Only one hero cannot accept: why is fate favorable to cynical people who seek personal gain in everything, and so ruthless to those who are guided by the dictates of the soul, and not by calculation? If at the beginning of the play Chatsky is in the daze of his dreams, now the true state of things has opened before him, and he has "sobered up".

The meaning of the image of Chatsky

The creation of the image of Chatsky Griboedov was led by the desire to show the brewing split in the nobility. The role of Chatsky in the comedy "Woe from Wit" is quite dramatic, because he remains in the minority and is forced to retreat and leave Moscow, but he does not deviate from his views. So Griboedov shows that Chatsky's time has not yet come. It is no coincidence that such heroes are classified as extra people in Russian literature. However, the conflict has already been identified, so the replacement of the old by the new is ultimately inevitable.

The above description of the image of the protagonist is recommended for students of grade 9 to read before writing an essay on the topic “The image of Chatsky in the comedy “Woe from Wit””

Artwork test

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is the main male character of the comedy. He was left an orphan quite early, and was brought up in the house of his father's friend, Famusov. Together with the daughter of the patron he received an excellent education. Over time, his friendship with Sophia grew into love. He sincerely admired her and wanted to marry her.

Chatsky is a very honest and active person. He got bored, and he went to travel, to see the world. Famusov could not instill his worldview in Chatsky. Upon his return, Chatsky realized that society remained the same. Chatsky lives in the future, has a negative attitude towards the cruelty of the landlords and serfdom. Chatsky is a fighter for a just society and dreams of benefiting the people. He criticizes people who are engaged in careerism, he believes that "you need to serve the cause, not the person." And although Chatsky is very smart, as Famusov noted: “he is small with a head, and writes and translates nicely,” but he went to serve in the army.

Chatsky is a proud, direct and noble person who always expresses his opinion. It is difficult for him to live in an immoral society. He greatly experiences disappointment in his beloved and her betrayal, and understands that he has no place among people who live in lies and meanness.

Other works on this topic:

1. Chatsky arrives in Moscow, hoping for big changes that occurred in society, and the remaining former Sophia. But it turns out to be in a completely different situation. Sophia turned everything past...
2. Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov is one of the main characters of the comedy. If the surname Famusov is translated from Latin, then it will mean "famous, enjoying fame." Famusov lives in...
3. I recently read a wonderful work by the remarkable poet A. S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit”. In this comedy, Chatsky became the most memorable and beloved character for me ....
4. We are talking about the immortality of A. S. Griboedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”. This is not a red word. Comedy is truly immortal. For several generations of us, readers and ...
5. Critics notice that not only Chatsky's social impulse, but also Repetilov's chatter can be understood as the author's view of Decembrism. Why is Repetilov introduced into the comedy? ...