Sophia's social status is woe. The image of Sophia in the comedy "Woe from Wit" A

It’s difficult to say for sure what kind of Sofya Pavlovna she is. Her image is complex and multifaceted. Nature did not deprive her positive qualities. Sophia is quite smart, her character is strong and independent. Her warm heart doesn't let her stop dreaming. Sophia has long been accustomed to the fact that she is the mistress of the house, and everyone should feel this, which means obey. Perhaps this is because she has been raised without maternal love for a long time.

Sophia has independence and an authoritative tone, despite her young, seventeen-year-old age. Her speech even has a certain imprint of serfs, because she often communicates with them, but also French books left their mark. Sophia is concerned about people's emotional experiences. The girl was raised by French governesses.

Despite your positive features, in the Famusovs’ society, all this does not find development. Thanks to her upbringing, she has generally accepted views, thinks the same way as other representatives of this society, which instilled in her lies and hypocrisy. Sophia imagines people only from her observations of people from books and French novels. Probably, it was this literature that influenced the development of sentimentality and sensuality in her. From books, she emphasized all the traits that the hero of her novel should have. Thanks to all this, she turned her attention to Molchalin, who vaguely resembled the heroes from her favorite works. No other ideal could be found in this environment. Sophia lives with real feelings. Even if the object of her love is in fact pitiful and wretched, all this does not give the situation a comedic overtone. Rather, on the contrary, it gives more drama and sadness.

Sophia divided her world into two parts: the object of her adoration, Molchalin, and everything else. All her thoughts are occupied only with him, especially when he is not around. Despite everything, this love does not bring joy. Because the girl understands perfectly well that her father will never accept such a person. This thought makes her life unbearable. It is so difficult for Sophia to live with these feelings that she is ready to tell complete strangers about her love. For example, Liza, the servant of their house, and then Chatsky. For her love, she chose a resigned man. This is exactly how she imagines Molchalin. But the final scene is where Sofya Pavlovna witnesses Molchalin’s attention to Elizabeth. It breaks her heart, it hurts all her feelings. It becomes clear that although Sophia is breaking up with the unworthy Molchalin, the type of this man remains a priority for her.

Briefly for 9th grade

Essay Characteristics of Sophia in the comedy Woe from Wit

After Patriotic War 1812, when Russian troops reached Paris and “swallowed” freedom, Russian society split into two camps. Some wanted to continue living as before. This is Famusov, Skalozub. Others, in particular the younger generation represented by Chatsky, wanted to live in a new way.

Sophia found herself like a knight at a crossroads, not knowing who to choose. She was raised by Papa Famusov himself and a French madam in the best traditions of Moscow society. Dancing, singing, reading French sentimental novels - these are all the joys of her life. Having read books, she confused her girlish fantasies and the harsh reality of life. Sophia has her head in pink clouds and doesn’t understand people at all. She doesn’t like the stupid, albeit rich Skalozub, but she also likes the sarcastic Chatsky. She herself is sharp-tongued. Sophia wants a husband-boy, a husband-servant. Here Molchalin is the very hero of her fantasies. He is constantly silent, like a girl, shy, without conflict. The fact that Molchalin is not really like that eludes Sophia. Love, as usual, is blind and deaf.

But you can’t say about her that she’s stupid. She accurately notices the characteristics of the people around her. So Skalozub is a stupid soldier who knows nothing except the army. She doesn't want such a husband. The father is a grumpy old bore who tyrannizes his subordinates and servants. To take revenge on Chatsky for his caustic remarks towards Molchalin, she tells everyone that he is crazy.

This comedy is still relevant today. Many girls and women, having read smart books, horoscopes, and fortune telling, live in anticipation of their imaginary prince. They endow it with different qualities. A real people those that do not fit these patterns are simply ignored or rejected. But the trouble is, the desired prince does not want to be what the woman imagined him to be. He is a living person with his own shortcomings, sometimes very dubious - a womanizer, a drunkard, a gambler, a gigolo.

The moral of the comedy is this - you need to be more attentive to the people around you, accept them as they are, and not “drive” them into your framework and standards. Then there will be no grief from excess of mind.

The image of Sophia in the comedy Woe from Wit

Sophia is the heroine of Griboyedov’s story “Woe from Wit.” This girl is a very unusual character in Griboedov's story. She is both the product of lies and benevolence and strength, albeit only external.

Sophia is a girl who is the one from whom all the threads came, both the mood and the grief of many people. She, like a puppeteer, skillfully took advantage of their weaknesses, and strengths. She's a manipulator, to say the least. modern language. But at the same time, with these qualities and such character, Sophia - beautiful girl, who also knows how to use her appearance. She has many fans, and for good reason, because she is strong in this.

This girl is strong personality who will not miss hers. In addition, by nature, she is also very mocking, her sarcasm reaches many ears, she loves to make fun of her and tell some jokes. But she is not too cheerful, one can more accurately say that she knows how to speak sarcastically, her irony can both offend someone and make her an enemy.

Sophia grew up in a good family, rich, well-off in everything, which did not know the costs of the strong in anything. That is why this girl is young and grew up to be a wealthy, bright and courageous person. She was not afraid of anything, and knew how to skillfully be a hypocrite and lie when necessary. And, to justify her, we can say that she is not entirely to blame for this, since such actions and character traits were not new at that time. That’s precisely why she was like that, because she was raised that way, brought up in an environment where it was impossible to be and act differently. Otherwise, it caused gossip and rumors, as well as contempt and ill will.

The comedy “Woe from Wit” gives examples of a person who is also the main character.

Option 4

A.S. Griboedov was a multifaceted personality. He had a unique talent as a diplomat and theatergoer. Alexander Sergeevich wrote poetry, poems, and played several instruments. He even composed music. Two waltzes by him have survived to this day. But Griboyedov entered the history of world literature as the author of one work. It was the comedy “Woe from Wit,” recognized by critics as immortal.

The play included three artistic directions: realism, classicism, romanticism. The traditions of the genre are combined with more modern trends. Social comedy, in its classical interpretation, assumes one-sided images of characters. Each of which exposes one particular vice. But “Woe from Wit” reveals to the reader the multifaceted personalities of the characters. Stupidity, absurd imitation of foreigners, martineting, servility, sycophancy, commercialism, lack of own opinion, persecution of culture and education - the author reflected everything in his “living” characters.

The main conflict of the play is the confrontation between the “present century” and the “past century.” Only Alexander Andreevich Chatsky ends up in the first camp. Then, as in the second headquarters - almost everyone else.

Against the backdrop of public conflict unfolds love triangle. It doesn't look like the plot love story. There are two men, but neither one claims to be ideal. Chatsky, despite his intelligence and education, is harsh, not restrained in his speeches, and is not always tactful. Molchalin is low, mean, and unpleasant. But the heroine’s sympathies are on his side.

The young lady herself also doesn’t look like classic look. Sophia is the daughter of a major official. Pavel Afanasyevich is a manager in a state house, rich. She wants a bright future for her only child. The groom is necessary “in rank, and in the stars.” Neither Chatsky nor Molchalin meet these criteria. The father exclaims: “Whoever is poor is not a match for you!”

A.S. Pushkin wrote about Sophia that she is an unclear image, a poorly written character. But this is only at first glance. The young lady, throughout the text, plays the role of a buffer between the two worlds. She does not belong to the “Famus society”, although she was raised in it. But it cannot be counted among the “present century.” This is her key role. After all, in the end education wins.

Most guests of the Famusov ball wear speaking names. But Sophia has an expressive name, meaning “wise.” This is the author's irony.

The girl is not stupid. She has good upbringing. My father hired a “regiment of teachers.” But she lost her mother early, so no one was involved in the formation of her soul. Now the young lady is seventeen, she has “bloomed” and has become an enviable bride.

Sonya is brave and decisive. She finds it difficult to keep her love a secret. He is not afraid of parental anger and public opinion. The young lady exclaims: “What do I care about rumors!”

She allows herself caustic, sarcastic, witty statements with Chatsky. But he tenderly worries about Molchalin. He faints when he falls from his horse.

The young lady grew up reading French novels. Therefore, he attributes all the virtues to his chosen one, drawing an ideal. Perhaps that is why the choice fell on the poor young man. After all, in sentimental books the lover is always no match.

The girl has no special spiritual beauty, virtues. But something about her attracts Chatsky, arousing love. May be, a strong character.

At the end of the story, Sophia realizes that her chosen one is a scoundrel. Blames himself for everything. But Chatsky is probably right. Another “sycophant and businessman” will appear, whom Sonya will marry.

Summer is the most wonderful time of the year. What do I expect from summer? First of all, I look forward to summer, like all those who study at school, college, and university, I look forward to the long-awaited summer holidays.

Postilion Antipka in Turgenev's story Mumu (characterization, image)

Postilion Antipka is one of the characters in Turgenev’s wonderful work, in which he revealed many burning topics that worried the society of that time in one way or another.

The image of Sofia Pavlovna Famusova is complex. She is endowed by nature good qualities. This girl is smart, proud, with a strong and independent character, with a warm heart, dreamy. These traits are clearly manifested in both her behavior and her language. ( This material will help you write competently on the topic The image and character of Sophia in the comedy Woe from Wit. Summary does not make it possible to understand the full meaning of the work, so this material will be useful for a deep understanding of the work of writers and poets, as well as their novels, novellas, short stories, plays, and poems.) He says this about her People's Artist USSR A. A. Yablochkina, one of best performers the role of Sophia: “Doesn’t the special language of Sophia’s mushroom-eaters, so different from the language of the other characters in Woe from Wit, reveal her image? Her speech clearly shows that, despite the fact that she is seventeen years old, this is not the speech of a girl, but of a housewife accustomed to general submission. She has been without a mother for a long time, she feels like a mistress. Hence her authoritative tone, her independence. At the same time, she is on her own, mocking, vindictive: undoubtedly, she is a girl with great character. In her speech there is something from the serfs, with whom she constantly has to deal, and, on the other hand, from French madams and French books.”

Sophia constantly talks about various emotional experiences: “he pretended to be in love, demanding and distressed”, “killed by his coldness”, “he will sigh from the depths of his soul”, etc.

Her “mind is manifested in statements of a general nature: “ Happy Hours they don’t observe”, “Just think how happiness is capricious, and grief waits around the corner”, etc.

Sophia received her upbringing under the guidance of French governesses. Hence the abundance of Gallicisms1 in her speech: “to tell you a dream,” “to share laughter.” On the other hand, there are also colloquialisms in her language, for example: “you deigned to run in”, “make you laugh”, “to the hairdresser, the tongs will catch a cold.”

Sophia’s good traits and natural inclinations could not be developed in Famus society. On the contrary, false education instilled in Sophia a lot of negative things, made her a representative of the generally accepted views in this circle, accustomed her to lies and hypocrisy. I. A. Goncharov in his article “A Million Torments” correctly says about Sophia: “This is a mixture of good instincts with lies, a living mind with the absence of any hint of ideas and beliefs, confusion of concepts, mental and moral blindness - all this does not have the character of personal vices in her, but is like common features her circle. In her own, personal face, something of her own is hidden in the shadows, hot, tender, even dreamy. The rest belongs to education.”

Sophia gleaned her ideas about people and life from observations of the life of people in her circle and from French sentimental novels, which were then very popular among the nobility, especially among girls.

This one sentimental literature and developed dreaminess and sensitivity in Sophia, according to which she drew the hero of her novel - an ordinary, sensitive person. It was these novels that could make her pay attention to Molchalin, who in some of his features and behavior resembled her "favorite heroes. Played famous role in her passion for Molchalin to another circumstance, which Goncharov points out: “The desire to patronize a loved one, poor, modest, who does not dare to raise his eyes to her, to elevate him to himself, to his circle, to give him family rights. Without a doubt, she enjoyed the role of ruling over a submissive creature, making him happy and having an eternal slave in him. It’s not her fault that this turned out to be a future “husband-boy, husband-servant - the ideal of Moscow husbands!” There was nowhere to come across other ideals in Famusov’s house.”

In Sofia, Goncharov sees “strong inclinations of a remarkable nature, a lively mind, passion and feminine softness,” but “she was ruined in the stuffiness, where not a single ray of light, not a single stream penetrated.” fresh air" It was for these good qualities of Sophia that Chatsky loved her, and it was all the more painful for him to see in her, after a three-year absence in Moscow, a typical representative of the Famus circle. But Sophia also experiences a tragedy when, having overheard Molchalin’s conversation with Liza, she sees the person she loves in the real light. According to Goncharov, “of course, it’s harder for her than anyone else, harder even for Chatsky.”

If homework on the topic of: "The image and character of Sophia in the comedy Woe from Wit - artistic analysis. Griboyedov Alexander Sergeevich If you find it useful, we will be grateful if you post a link to this message on your page on your social network.

Latest news

Categories

News

Essays on the topic

Essay rating

V.F. Khodasevich said: “Griboyedov is a man of one book.” It seems to me that this is not entirely fair, but, of course, A.S. became famous. Griboyedov with his comedy "Woe from Wit". This work is immortal. It has long been quoted, and its heroes have become household names.

Sofya Famusova – chief female character in the play. This is a seventeen-year-old girl with whom Chatsky is madly in love. And Sophia herself was in love with Alexander Andreevich, but over time everything changed. By the time Chatsky arrived in Moscow, Sophia was irrevocably in love with her father’s secretary, Molchalin.

In my opinion, Sophia occupies an intermediate position among the heroes of the work. On the one hand, she has qualities that sharply distinguish this heroine from the Famus circle. First of all, this is independence of judgment and contempt for gossip and public opinion. She says: “What do I need rumors? Whoever wants to, judges it that way...”

I.A. Goncharov, in his article “A Million Torments,” described Sophia as “a mixture of good instincts and lies.” Indeed, this heroine has traits that make her capable of both good and bad deeds. Sophia is headstrong, stubborn, but also capricious and not very well-behaved.

Sofya Famusova is undoubtedly smart and observant. She knows the laws of “Famus” society very well and knows how to predict people’s actions. That is why this heroine manages to take revenge on Chatsky so cruelly. Sophia spreads gossip about his madness, knowing that she ex-lover the real persecution will begin. Although, in fact, this heroine was confident in Chatsky’s “clear mind and full health”:

He is ready to believe!

Ah, Chatsky! You love to dress everyone up as jesters,

Would you like to try it on yourself?

We can say that Sophia in the comedy is one of the smartest and most sensible characters. But she also finds herself in a comical and, at the same time, sad situation because of her love for Molchalin. I think that her love for this “most pitiful creature” was serious. But did Sophia really not see the true essence of this hero? After all, in a conversation with Chatsky, she extols to the skies spiritual qualities Molchalina:

Of the most wonderful quality

He is finally: compliant, modest, quiet.

Not a shadow of worry in his face,

And there are no wrongdoings in my soul,

He doesn’t cut strangers at random, -

That's why I love him.

But the heroine does not notice “how the portrait turns out vulgar.” Molchalin for Sophia is a romantic hero, the height of perfection. Therefore, in the second act of the comedy, when Molchalin falls from his horse, Sophia is so worried that she faints. An insignificant incident grows in her eyes to the size of a real tragedy. She says to Alexey Stepanych:

Molchalin! How my sanity remained intact!

You know how dear your life is to me!

Why should she play, and so carelessly?

It seems to me that these words of Sophia are very reminiscent of the words of the heroine of some romance novel. And this is no coincidence. Let us remember that the girl was fond of French novels and dreamed of her knight on a white horse. I think that in Molchalin she found such a knight. Or rather, she came up with it for herself, because there were no worthy young people around Sophia. She shouldn’t have been paying attention to Skalozub! This was clearly “not the hero of her novel.”

So, Sophia chose Molchalin as her hero. She came up with the idea that this was an ideal, “a model of moderation and accuracy.” The girl doesn’t even try to find out what Alexey Stepanych really is like. Sophia does not notice his “vulgarity” and pretense. “God brought us together,” says the heroine. She likes to think so, to imagine herself as the heroine of her favorite novels. She forces Molchalin to behave like romantic heroes: sitting up all night until the morning reading books together, sighing for Sophia:

He will take your hand and press it to your heart,

He will sigh from the depths of his soul...

Sophia completely surrenders to her feelings. For the sake of Molchalin, she goes to the length of violating all decency: love for a person from the lower class, nightly dates, etc. But the girl neglects the opinion of society, and this makes her a person of the “new generation”. After all, for “fathers” there is nothing worse than “the opinion of Princess Marya Aleksevna.”

Sophia lives in a world of her illusions. This is confirmed by her attitude towards Chatsky. She does not seek to understand him, to see the real motives and goals of this hero. The girl considers Chatsky callous and heartless (“Not a man, a snake!”) and tries to hurt and humiliate Alexander Andreevich as much as possible. So, she says to him: “What do you need me for?” In her relationship with Chatsky, Sophia is just as “blind” and “deaf” as in her relationship with Molchalin.

At the end of the comedy, life makes Sophia see the light. She finally sees Molchalin's real face. In this difficult situation for her, the girl behaves very dignified. With contempt she says to Molchalin:

Reproaches, complaints, my tears

Don’t you dare wait, you’re not worth it...

Sophia realizes her self-deception. It’s very difficult for her, but she only blames herself for everything. “All in tears,” Sophia says: “I blame myself all around.” IN final scenes Comedy, the image of Sophia acquires tragic features. No wonder I.A. Goncharov said about this heroine that she has it “harder than everyone else, harder even than Chatsky, and she gets “a million torments.” Smart, well-read, but far from real life the heroine suffers her “woe from the mind.”

Sofya Famusova evokes my sympathy and pity. She has many positive traits and great potential. The girl is thirsty true love, strong feelings. But she is surrounded by insignificant and unworthy people. It’s hard for her to resist such an onslaught alone. The girl strives to be happy, but no one can help her, advise her, or set her on the right path. Therefore, the girl is forced to make mistakes on her own and correct them. What does the future hold for Sophia? It seems to me that she will go to the camp of “children” who, like Sophia, have great mind and sincere heart.

Article menu:

To understand who Sofya Pavlovna Famusova is, the heroine of the play “Woe from Wit,” you need to know the features of the time in which Alexander Griboedov lived. The author created a satire in which he showed the obvious vices of those who consider themselves the elite of society, leveling any desire for education, learning, learning new things and insisting on observing the old orders. Sophia is a representative of this class.

Her image cannot be called positive, but if the reader thinks that this girl is completely negative character, may make a mistake in his conclusions. So, let's follow the character and actions of Sofia Famusova.

Characteristics of Sofia Famusova

From the pages of the work we learn that Sophia, unlike her father who is opposed to teaching, is an educated girl who loves to read books, mainly French novels. It was thanks to this literature that she became sentimental and sensual.

Compared to the representatives of the nobility of Famus society, Sophia seems smart and developed. The heroine of the play can play the piano and flute. “...Now you hear a flute, now it’s like a piano; Would it be too early for Sophia??”

Sophia's character is domineering and demanding: she commands the house like a mistress, despite her young age. A seventeen-year-old girl commands and is obeyed. In addition, Sophia has determination: “...I will scream and wake up everyone in the house and destroy myself and you...” she says.

However, despite these, on the one hand, positive qualities, Sophia, like a sponge, absorbed the lies and hypocrisy inherent in representatives of Famus society.

Alexander Chatsky and Sofia Famusova

Alexander Chatsky initially chose Sophia as his bride, because, firstly, she was close to him in spirit, and secondly, he saw in her intelligence and strong character.

Dear readers! We suggest you look at the table.

He was also impressed by this girl’s independence from others. However, when Chatsky arrived from St. Petersburg with the intention of marrying Sophia, she greeted him very coldly, because she was already carried away by someone else - Alexei Stepanovich Molchalin, who at that time lived in her father’s house. It remains a mystery that the girl chose the smart and intellectually developed Chatsky over the stupid and narrow-minded man.

Sofya Famusova and Alexey Molchalin

Possessing a romantic nature, Sophia fell in love with a man who, in character and habits, was similar to the hero of her favorite works. The cause of her heartfelt melancholy was Alexey Molchalin, her father’s secretary. But this choice of Sophia is justified not only by this, because Molchalin is a person who can be commanded, and, as you know, Sophia loves to push people around. However, blinded by passion, the girl does not want to notice how pathetic and stupid her chosen one is. On the contrary, the heroine of the play is very worried about Alexei, and faints when he falls from his horse. However, Sophia's dreams of life together with her chosen one is not destined to come true, because marriage with this man is not only disgusting to her father, but also to Molchalin himself. However, another unexpected circumstance indicated the absolute impossibility of connecting Sophia’s life with Molchalin: at the end of the play it was revealed true face Alexei, who secretly from Sophia also met with the maid Lisa.

Molchalin’s feigned modesty was shattered, as it turned out that he was a two-faced and dangerous person.

Sophia is disappointed because the one on whom she pinned her hopes turned out to be a scoundrel and a hypocrite. “Go no further, I’ve heard a lot, Terrible man! “I’m ashamed of myself,” she laments, finally seeing that she wanted to connect her life with an unworthy, insignificant man.

Reader reviews about the heroine of the play

“Sofya Famusova surprises with her dual nature. On the one hand, she is kind, loves and pities Molchalin very much, although she sees that he is intellectually inferior to her, on the other hand, she commands the household with might and main. It's a pity that this girl's fate didn't work out. In my opinion, if she connected her life with Chatsky, she would be happy.”

“In tandem - Sophia, Molchalin, Chatsky - I feel sorry for Alexander Chatsky. He specially came to propose to the girl, wanted to marry her, but she refused him, preferring Molchalin, who did not have high intelligence, to an intelligent man. In addition, she spread rumors that Chatsky was crazy. It's a pity that it's normal and smart person The society where he lives and interacts with people leaves its mark, and few people decide in this case to swim against the tide.”

9th grade students are often assigned an essay on the topic “The image of Sophia in the comedy “Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboedov.” Here is a sample essay on the specified topic. However, before we start writing the essay, let's remember the main characteristics of Sophia's image.

Essay text.

“Griboyedov belongs to the most powerful manifestations of the Russian spirit,” Belinsky once said. Having tragically died at the age of thirty-four, Griboyedov undoubtedly did not create everything that he could have accomplished using his creative powers. He was not destined to realize numerous creative plans, striking in their wide scope and depth. A brilliant poet and thinker, he remained in history as the author of one famous work. But Pushkin said: “Griboedov did his thing: he already wrote “Woe from Wit” . These words contain recognition of Griboyedov’s great historical service to Russian literature.

In “Woe from Wit” Griboyedov put forward the main social and ideological theme of his turning point - the theme of irreconcilable hostility between the defenders of the old, inert way of life and the supporters of the new worldview, the new free life.

The main character of the comedy, Chatsky, is seen both in his relationships with representatives of Famus society and with Sophia, whom he loves. That's why Sophia plays an important role in the comedy and her attitude not only towards Chatsky, but also towards Molchalin. The image of Sofia Pavlovna is complex. By nature, she is endowed with good qualities: a strong mind and an independent character. She is capable of deeply experiencing and sincerely loving. For a girl of the noble circle she received a good education and education. The heroine enjoys reading French literature. Famusov, Sophia's father, says:

She can't sleep from French books,

And the Russians make it hard for me to sleep.

This girl is neither good nor bad. So, for example, when Pushkin first became acquainted with Griboedov’s play, the image of Sophia seemed to him “not clearly written.”

I want to try to understand her character. It itself is very complex. In Sophia, “good instincts and lies” are intricately intertwined. She has to dodge and lie so as not to betray her love to her stupid father. She is forced to hide her feelings not only because of fear of her father; It hurts her when in things that are poetic and beautiful for her they see only harsh prose. Chatsky’s love for Sophia will help us understand one truth: the character of the heroine in some important way matches the main thing positive hero all comedy. At seventeen years old, she not only “bloomed beautifully,” as Chatsky says about her, but also shows an enviable will, unthinkable for people like Molchalin, Skalozub, or even her father. It is enough to compare Famusov’s “what will Princess Marya Aleksevna say,” Molchalin’s “I am independent, but I must depend on others,” and Sophia’s remark: “What do I hear? Whoever wants to, judges that way.” This statement is not just “words.” The heroine is guided by them literally at every step: both when she receives Molchalin in her room, and when, in front of Skalozub and Chatsky, she runs shouting to Osip: “Ah! My God! fell, killed himself! - and she herself falls unconscious, without thinking about the impression of others.

But, unfortunately, all these positive features character could not be developed in Famus Society. This is how I wrote about it in my critical study“A Million Torments” by I. A. Goncharov: “It is difficult to be unsympathetic to Sofya Pavlovna: she has strong inclinations of a remarkable nature, a lively mind, passion and feminine softness. It is ruined in the stuffiness, where not a single ray of light, not a single stream of fresh air penetrates.” At the same time, Sophia is a child of her society. She drew her ideas about people and life from French sentimental novels, and it was this sentimental literature that developed Sophia's dreaminess and sensitivity. She says about Molchalin:

He will take your hand and press it to your heart,

He will sigh from the depths of his soul,

Not a free word, and so the whole night passes,

Hand in hand, and doesn’t take his eyes off me.

Therefore, it was no coincidence that she paid attention to Molchalin, who, with his words and behavior, reminded her of her favorite heroes. However, it cannot be said that the heroine is blinded: she is able to evaluate her chosen one sensibly and critically:

Of course, he doesn’t have this mind,

What a genius is to others, oh to others a plague,

Which is fast, brilliant and quick against it...

Sophia is absolutely confident in herself, in her actions, in her feelings. Although in all this, perhaps, a significant role is played by that spontaneity, not the corruption of her nature, which allows us to compare her with Pushkin’s Tatyana Larina. But there is also a significant difference between them. Tatyana embodies the ideal character of a Russian woman, as Pushkin imagines her. Possessing extremely positive qualities of her soul, she loves an extraordinary man, worthy of her in a number of qualities. Sophia’s chosen one, unfortunately, is different, but this is visible only to us and Chatsky. Sophia, blinded by Molchalin’s advances, sees only good things in him.

At Sophia’s first meeting with Chatsky, she does not show the same interest in him, she is cold and unkind. This puzzled Chatsky a little and even upset him. In vain he tried to insert into the conversation the witticisms that had previously amused Sophia so much. They only led to an even more indifferent and slightly angry response from Sophia: “Has it ever happened, through a mistake or in sadness, that you said something good about someone?”. Sophia maintains her proud opinion of Chatsky until the end of the play: "Not a man - a snake." The next meetings between Sophia and Chatsky differ little from each other. But in Act 3, Chatsky decides to “pretend once in his life” and begins to praise Molchalin in front of Sophia. Sophia managed to get rid of Chatsky’s obsessive questions, but she herself gets carried away and completely loses herself in her feelings, again without thinking at all about the consequences, which once again proves to us the strength of her character. To Chatsky’s question: “Why did you get to know him so briefly?”, she replies: “I didn’t try! God brought us together." This is enough for Chatsky to finally understand who Sophia is in love with.

The heroine paints a full-length portrait of Molchalin, giving it the most rosy coloring, perhaps hoping in her soul to reconcile not only herself, but also others, with this love. Sophia loves Molchalin, but hides it from her father, who, of course, would not recognize him as a son-in-law, knowing that he is poor. The heroine sees a lot of good in her father’s secretary:

...yielding, modest, quiet,

Not a shadow of worry in his face,

And there are no wrongdoings in my soul,

He doesn’t cut strangers at random, -

That's why I love him.

Sophia also fell in love with Molchalin because she, a girl with character, needed a person in her life whom she could control.

“The desire to patronize a loved one, poor, modest, who does not dare raise his eyes to her, to elevate him to oneself, to one’s circle, to give him family rights” -

this is its goal, according to I. A. Goncharov. Chatsky naturally does not want to listen to Sophia. For him, Molchalin is a person not worthy of respect, much less the love of a girl like Sophia.

We involuntarily think: what attracted Sophia to Molchalin? Perhaps his appearance or deep way of thinking? Of course not. The boredom that reigns in the Famusovs' house primarily affects the girl's young, trembling heart. The soul of the young and beautiful Sophia is filled with the romantic expectation of love; she, like all girls of her age, wants to be loved and love herself. Having unraveled Sophia’s secret aspirations, Molchalin turns out to be nearby, he lives in the house. A young man of good appearance, moderately educated, quickly takes on the role of a lover and enchanted. Compliments, courtship, and Molchalin’s constant presence do their job. A girl falls in love without being able to choose or compare.

Sophia involuntarily hears Molchalin's conversation with Liza and suddenly sees her chosen one in a different light. She realized that in fact Molchalin took on the appearance of a lover only “to please the daughter of such a man.” He needed Sophia only in order to take advantage of her influence at the right moment. His goal was also to get a higher rank, so he, according to the behests of his father, pleased “all people without exception.” Perhaps someday Sophia would have learned about Molchalin’s true intentions and she would not have been so hurt. But now she has lost a man who was very suitable for the role of a boy-husband, a servant-husband. I think she will be able to find such a person and will repeat the fate of Natalia Dmitrievna Gorich and Princess Tugoukhovskaya. And if Sophia had grown up in a different environment, she might have chosen Chatsky. But she chooses the person who suits her best, since she cannot imagine any other hero. And in the end, according to Goncharov’s remark, “heavier than anyone, even Chatsky,” it is Sophia.

Griboyedov introduced us to the heroine of the comedy as a dramatic person. This is the only character who is conceived and executed as close to Chatsky.

So, in his comedy A. S. Griboedov managed to show not only the time in which he lived, but also created unforgettable images, interesting and to the modern reader and to the viewer. Therefore, as Goncharov says, “Woe from Wit” stands apart in literature and differs from other works in its youthfulness, freshness and stronger vitality.