Further into the forest there is more firewood. Further into the forest there is more firewood value

They are known in the Russian Federation they invented. It's not hidden.

It would seem that no huge thought process is required to understand the elementary thing, namely, that all governing bodies in the Russian Federation are copied from the world " from there", with its own voiced principles " from there"transferred" here"and what's in power" bourgeoisie"(quotes because calling a Russian individual entrepreneur a bourgeois is a compliment to the most hardened speculator) not someone will come to power, but precisely the same bourgeois. Slogans and chatter are not significant here. Hence the conclusion that was voiced - power is a matter of property, which no one has ever decided in elections, and will not decide... Understanding (and you probably already saw that today understanding is in no way connected with further activities based on this understanding) these " little things"already, it would seem, they make you see that all these pre-election brushstrokes of the party in power, ugh... and ugh again. But no... and this is not enough. And that’s not all.... Even your own vision, and your life experience has nothing to do with the choice of the government that shows you what Russia is. Don’t believe your eyes? Turn on any channel and you will see Russia through the eyes of the media and anyone else." analytics", who have gained access to the brains of the nation. And? What kind of Russia are they showing you from morning to morning?

But... remember Khrushchev? His story is ignored, but in vain. I won’t talk here about his economic mistakes and errors, but about the future from the very bell tower when he broadcast from it " great reformer"Nikita Sergeevich, under the slogans down with Stalin. Everything would be fine, but Stalin was communism. No Stalin, no communism. Yes, then to the term " Marxism"term added" Leninism", and it was natural, because Lenin developed this theory and won. Not just anyone, but Lenin won the victory. I described the theory of that victory, but here I’ll tell you something else.

The CPSU killed Stalin and destroyed communist theory in the world. The point is not in the lies that became the basis for “exposing the cult,” but in the fact that by exposing a certain cult, sabotage was carried out in relation to the teaching itself. Ideological collapse is the result of Khrushchev. But... it happened. What's next? So let's think about it.

I got distracted. Khrushchev chose. I chose the dumbest way out that could be invented. He did not move away from his crime at the congress, relying on the same Marxism and Leninism... (And this could have been done), but stupidly announced that from now on, there would be no dictatorship of the proletariat, because it had exhausted itself. Well, society... it will go to communism by 1980. Of course, no one was going to explain what communism is, nor what will happen after 1980 (we’ll just live there). And off we go...

Let's go. The ideologists of Marxism, who were so smart back then, suddenly realized that it turned out that it was possible to receive social benefits without much mental effort, hiding behind the fig leaf of doctrine. I give lectures to state farm directors and collective farm chairmen, and then, rubbing my hands and being considered smart, I receive those same benefits. And these benefits become business card me as a person, especially since Khrushchev allowed the party to manage everything. Stalin and Beria for what " pillory"Were the stories printed? Precisely because they dared to push the party into secondary roles. This is where the strengthening of those government bodies in the USSR that were party-owned came from. Well, who they brought up, you can see in full today on the same TV or in our Duma. THEY ARE ALL CHILDREN OF THE PARTY IN THE USSR!

We are facing a trend, as they say. Not from simple to complex, but from complex to the simplest. Here time played a role, because it tends to flow quickly. Yesterday it was still school, and today it’s already 50... and when to live? The kids and relatives of the smart kids realized this. Do rockets fly? Well, to hell with them, but Marxism feeds us well. Let this theory be the theory that they hated. The question is, why? It's a feeding trough. But because there is something that is a larger feeding trough in scale, and since the USSR will not create a video tape recorder and an 18+ film (what the hell is it? A cinema with a penny ticket is a culture of wow, what a height. This is not for you to slurp corn today leaving behind vomit scraps), then you will have to feed this way and that, where possible. By skipping " there"and stupidity will serve. And?

And so it began. Marxism is bad because in the West even an unemployed person lives in a car... because, while I want five types of sausage, I eat one of meat. I don’t want to and that’s all. As a person, give me a way to drink kefir like that. Who will release it? But this is a different matter, whoever needs it, let him release it... That is. did you notice? Don't notice anything? THIS WAS SAID AND WRITED BY THE COUNTRY'S ELITE! It was she who, when repealing the article on parasitism in the USSR, said that a parasite will be able to live a great life, and this is not his personal dignity, but the state as a whole, because from now on the one who is a sucker works, and the one who eats a sucker is the one who the state needs it, and the level of its milking will be appreciated and accepted by the West. What about us?

Any system has a hierarchy. The hierarchy of society (where the system of growing up with punishment as an educational part of the development of personality is integral) is the salvation of humanity and a factor of survival, just as taboo in culture is a factor of saving the morality of mankind. The elite of society are always smarter than the citizens. In the end, what clever thing does Putinism present to us today? But here is a dead end! Not just a dead end with only one way out new road pave or reverse - STUPID!

The dead end is not that there is no clear answer where is he going Russia. It’s not that man is generally absent from all these economic doctrines (where everything is put in first place... absolutely everything, and not man.” Economic expediency" " Market relations "and other nonsense), and not even that in Russia the ideology of the bourgeois class is completely absent (hence the outright nonsense that is carried to the masses" experts"liberalism), but in the fact that a simple man in the street from the electorate is ideologically smarter than a representative of the authorities. Hence the lack of dialogue.

Think about what the authorities might say when each of you starts broadcasting to them, through its own instruments of information dictatorship. Your simplest argument that you present will confuse her, and she, developing an instinct of defense in the form of generally accepted answers that have not changed for decades, will " sculpt a hunchback"... A striking example of the president's answers to questions. Do you think everyone in our country is a fool? Of course not, and yet, not a single one stood up and asked, Vladimir Vladimirovich, instead of repeating a bunch of nonsense every time, would they take it and answer, who in our country is responsible for issuing money? Is there something behind our money? Well, for example, such a trifle as my work and the result of my work... I won’t talk about the gold and other content of the currency.. .that we don’t have people who understand all these mechanisms? Someone would take it and ask, they say, Vladimir Vladimirovich, I spent my free time surfing the net and studying the biography of your personal circle.... excuse me, you are going to raise this with him Russia from its knees? Do you think we are idiots?

So, no ideology, no elite, whose elitism is in that very chair in full view of the cameras on those very forums. Are you sitting there? That means elite! If you're not there, that means you're a sucker. That's the whole selection criterion. And this is fear! The average person cannot be smarter than the authorities. He is afraid to be smarter than the authorities. To be smarter than the authorities means to become a victorious Bolshevik, because why do you need intelligence? For yourself personally? Then congratulations, my friend, you have lived your life in vain. How many times have I heard amazing dialogues, saying that we cannot know everything and therefore we must choose Putin, because he sees and accepts, understanding the hidden processes. I always answer this by saying that while I agree with this nonsense in some ways, I cannot understand why these same theses do not work when he/they evaluate democracy and the electoral system? What kind of metamorphosis is this?

The choice of power depends on you! Not only do you choose it without knowledge, but you DON’T NEED the most mediocre knowledge in this system!

Gentlemen, as soon as you start to think, Putinism does not disappear in a minute or a second. As soon as you begin to grow wiser, Putinism not only has no future, it is both doomed and condemned... not by you, because you are an instrument of history, where you sit in the judge’s chair.

Russian proverb meaning: The deeper you dive into a problem, matter, etc., the more subtleties and features that were previously hidden, you discover.

Examples

(1860 - 1904)

“Vaudeville” (1884): “The wife is hysterical. The daughter declares that she is not able to live with such violent parents, and gets dressed to leave home. . It ends with an important guest finding a doctor on stage applying the husband's head has lead lotions, and a private bailiff drawing up a protocol for violating public peace and quiet."

"Sakhalin island"- “The cattle, such as we have, are borrowed from the treasury and fed at the state expense. The further into the forest, the more firewood: all Arkov residents owe, their debt grows with each new crop, with each extra head of livestock, and for some it already extends to an unpaid figure - two or even three hundred rubles per capita."

(1809 - 1852)

(1831-1832), I - about Ivan Fedorovich Shponka:

“He was already nearly fifteen years old when he moved to the second grade, where, instead of the abbreviated catechism and the four rules of arithmetic, he began to study the long one, a book about the positions of man and fractions. But, seeing that the further into the forest, the more firewood, and having received the news that the father ordered him to live long, he stayed for another two years and, with the consent of his mother, then joined the P*** infantry regiment."

With strange headlines appearing in Lately in "Nasha Niva".

I can’t believe my eyes!

After all, “Nasha Niva” is not ours for a long time. But to wrap something like this up is mind-boggling!

However, if you take into account who calls the tune and add events to it last months, everything is drawn.

The West has finally changed its tactics. He no longer needed the destroyers of the last Soviet-era outpost. Their mission is over.

Due to the inertia of the working strata of the population, the electoral resource of the new plan, of course, remained the same. These are the intelligentsia, students and high school students.

The opposition has also invented the main culprit for “our troubles and our evils” - Putin’s Russia. Being under sanctions, you can hang all the dogs on her, starting with Ivan the Terrible. Will endure.

Now - at the instigation of Dubovets - they have added to her company, oddly enough, an ardent Russophobe of perestroika and post-Soviet times - Zenon Poznyak.

What is new in the approaches of the West and its henchmen to dismantling peace in our society?

The new task now is to enslave the same intelligentsia and youth on the sly. But without cultivating radical nationalist sentiments, but by creating intellectual platforms where fraternization with Russian liberals would become the norm.

After all, the Ciceros have disappeared from our country, and Navalny and others are visible in Russia.

I think that for this reason the opposition was gradually converted to Russian-speaking.

It is this goal that explains the strange appearance and circulation of quotes from the newly minted literary diva Svetlana Alexievich, who spoke quite definitely:

“It was impossible to do what I did in the Belarusian language.”

And finally, period. Finally, the main thing is the emergence of a passionate desire among the puppeteers to create here, on the basis of the portal TUT.by, which has radically changed its rhetoric, an intellectual platform for those who like to scratch their tongues with the involvement of the promoted liberalism of foreign countries (read - Russian renegades).

They are, like no one else, close to us in mentality.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Shenderovich or the taciturn Savik Shuster show up as hosts of these gatherings.

After all, he never said anything unpleasant about Lukashenko. Others spoke, and he, without visible emotions on his face, listened and did not assent.

But let's return to Poznyak.

I will honestly say that I, like many, understand this very bright propagandist, who managed to become the central figure of the Belarusian Popular Front in the late 80s, and then with little effort to saddle the Belarusian parliament and solve the priority tasks of gaining independence for the country.

The main thing: he is an ideological opponent of everything Soviet, but not a traitor. He does not count “Judas’ pieces of silver” in his pocket, but sticks to his line because he believes, because he is convinced that he is right and defends his point of view.

The West did not like Poznyak’s straightforwardness and independence of judgment, and he was pushed to the margins of Russophobic politics.

He is not their man. They don't need people with own opinion. They need performers.

So what does the revolutionary Sergei Dubovets, widely known in narrow circles, accuse Poznyak of on the pages of “Nasha Niva” and “Svoboda”?

Neither more nor less - in the most important thing: “The history of Muggles would have been different, if the Popular Front of the 90s would have been different.”.

Him, you see, then "nathnyauv pryklad" Popular Front of microscopic and quiet Estonia.

It was there, and not in Lithuania and Latvia with a huge number of Russians living, in his opinion, that the most successful pies were baked.

Maybe it was so, since in Estonia people did not die in clashes with special forces, and there was no particular need to torment the Russians. But Dubovets’ claim that he allegedly mastered the situation in the post-Soviet space at that time and could determine priorities is very doubtful.

To Dubovets, who was then in euphoria, “It seemed that Belarus, for most of its history, was stale and as non-Belarusian as the BSSR”.

But in Belarus, at first, she came to the throne "the highest dzyarzhauna asoba"- Shushkevich. In parliament, either Poznyak and his comrades, or Lukashenko were raging.

What line Dubovets followed then is not very clear, because he was not in the public eye and only came out now - with discussions about Poznyak’s mistakes.

Further, he asks why everything didn’t go the way it did in Estonia, why we are not where Estonia is, and not like Estonia with its higher standard of living than in the post-Soviet space.

Let's not argue with Dubovets. He either does not understand, or deliberately does not want to understand the difference in mentalities, the incomparability production capacity and the scale of production relationships that characterize the economies of our countries.

He does not think about current information about how many people left for the West from the Baltic republics in comparison with Belarus.

He is not interested in the state of the real sector of the economy and what are the prospects for economic development of Estonia, etc.

For him, Estonia is paradise, because “Didn’t people hate the good and bad Estonians there? And where did the democrats recognize the Popular Front? And why did they set a course for independence - NATO - Europe?

The question is, was it different for us in the early 90s?

Was our BPF headed by the Partygenosse? Didn’t US President Clinton come to us and give us a bench in Kurapaty?

After all, can a sane politician really believe that the path to "independence" lies through NATO membership?

In his rantings, Dubovets, of course, could not ignore "Mounaga torture."

80 percent of communists voted for his language, Soviet generals, even Yankovsky from the Russian Theater, but the fact that not everyone spoke on it is to blame "theatricalized radicalism" - “He is an intellect who developed that tiny hellishness of Belarus, which was taken away during the war. The parallel with Estonia was wrong.”

It’s hard to even call it stupidity. After all, the impulse of Belarusians for change at that time was not due to an insatiable thirst to use the Belarusian language, but to the distrust of the authorities sown among the people, Chernobyl fears and the infantilism of those who stood at the helm of the young republic.

Further, Dubovets claims that the split into the svyadomy and the unsvyadomy did not occur immediately after the formation of the Belarusian Popular Front, but after the election of the Supreme Council of the 12th convocation. And the reason for this is Poznyak.

He's writing: “At the same time, the “elite” disappeared - the menavita pavodle gatay prikmety - svyadomyh, gata zanyts, molded for others, maceros, lich that “Estonians”, who rose above the old Belarusians.”

We've arrived.

After all, everyone remembers that this so-called “elite” began to emerge when it ran from one room to another under the name "Talaka."

She, the “elite,” gained breath when the sons of party workers realized that in the changed conditions the chance to rise to the level of power of their fathers presented itself only on the wave of national radicalism, and not obedience.

After all, even then life posed the question bluntly: either - or. Maneuvering was not welcomed, since everyone was tired of it during perestroika times.

Further, Dubovets confirms the inertia of his own thinking:

“I saved 25 years, and maybe even more, as long as we know that Belarusians are different, because all the trees and oak trees are different.”

It turns out that the situation now is not the same as before. There was a click: harmony reigned in society and "pamyarkoўnasts". (“Facebook” doesn’t count).

But this appearance of reconciliation is not without reason. This is a run-up to kick Poznyak and his entourage again:

“And what do you say - how are the people pagodzitsa na getki padzel, that we are Belarusians, but are there more Belarusian Belarusians? It is clear that “great Belarusians” will have abstract meetings on their side.”

Lukashenko is left too. It turns out he “I took the language out of the city” because she “became an admonisher of my family”, and Belarusians are suckers “I felt satisfied with the hell of it, to show the “big Belarusians” Kuzkin’s mother.

The schools themselves are rightly de-Belarusized.”

Well, just like Emelyushka: “The sleigh rides, it rides on its own, it rides on its own without a horse.”

And this nationwide revolt, born of the radicalization of the Svyadomy, led to the fall of the Belarusian Popular Front as a powerful mass movement and contributed to “We are installing an authoritative madele of ўlady, because the “unstable” people are autamatychna subjects of the palace, and the “elite” is a stratsila subject, closed on itself.”

Dubovets never clarified what the subjectivity of the people in politics means and who prevented the “elite” from losing it, each time remembering his beloved Estonia.

In rare moments of enlightenment, he speaks the absolute truth:

“...every Estonian will tell you who Lukashenka is, but only the hellish people of Belarus can guess who the President of Estonia is.”

And then he gets nostalgic:

“... some people think so myself - all of us, at the heart of all Belarusians, are hidden from all Belarusians, we cry out to them and ourselves, to the whole people.”

Let us take a moment and imagine what the result would have been if Lenin and his entourage had "maryli" or “clicked to yourself” in 1917?

The Bolsheviks were not infantile intellectuals. They were armed modern theory, strategy and tactics of thoughtful actions. They persistently, competently and purposefully carried out daily work among workers and soldiers and were successful.

Revolutions in the minds of people are not made through incantations and humiliation of the current government alone. And the aggravation of national issues in multinational republics is always fraught with carnage. You don't have to look far for examples.

Thank God, Zenon Poznyak and the revolutionaries of the first wave, willy-nilly, were brought up in a decent society. At that time they were not itching to unleash fratricidal conflicts on very unstable national and linguistic grounds.

There was controversy, they broke ballpoint pens, but not spears.

And here Dubovets is openly disingenuous, declaring that “atrad musіў bazavazza na demakratychnyh padstav. Not at all on the canned and radical ones, which instead of the agricultural sector were used, on the contrary, by the loud elite and the desperate cleanliness. What's wrong and you're sick."

After all, we remember very well: the entire opposition was not at all engaged in a detailed elaboration of the strategy for returning the country’s economy to a stable position, but instead struck in search of the future in the past on the basis of nationalist sentiments alien to people.

Surely the same Dubovets tore his shirt by "The language and the weakened hell of Balshevism" instead of agitation for national consensus and the translation of public debate into the mainstream of economic problems and ways to solve them.

It served as an excuse for our national humanitarians, who knew nothing about economics. “Road to Europe.” It was as if they were impatiently waiting for us there and there was no life for them without us.

At the end of his story, Dubovets sincerely admits his thoughtlessness:

“In this case, if we understand this, the scale of the bastards and the apostolic exit of the “families of Belarus” has been eliminated - other countries have different countries, different languages.”

However, even today his reasoning has not received at least any replenishment with new ideas and does not go beyond “mounaga torture.”

He states that "znіkla self-proclaimed“elite of the great Belarusian Belarusians”, svyadomyh,” but, like a woodpecker, he remains faithful to the previous standard, with which he pins timid hopes: “...how can we understand ourselves with the Estonians, and why is this magical misery irrevocable?”

And Dubovets’s confession without admitting his own mistakes naturally caused a resonance in the opposition community.

It should be noted that many of the arguments of the discussion participants seem quite reasonable.

For example, someone under the nickname “Sviadomy”, talking about Poznyak, states:

“In 1994, I couldn’t have perekanauvchuyu podtrymku in the city... I would have had the Gamsakhurdy forest in Georgia... I could have worked on this, because I would have been able to produce a well-adjusted vertical and garyzantal, from Shushkevich’s atrocious hell.”

“...the size of the active Rukhaitsa has grown “everything, on the right is broken up, the pallet system is pabudavana - it is necessary to think about it”, the green ones have abandoned the work of the business, the family - right from the broad faction of the apa members of the parliament (there were only members of the Belarusian Popular Front) , they began to explore their own interests: who is the pasada, who is the cavalak of the land in the adpachynku zone, who is given away their works for dzyarzhainy kosht, who is married to Lithuania, who lives in an old Belarusian y stalitsy".

“Mae Ratsyu” and someone “Benedzikt”:

“Suchu for obmerkavannem and vyshavany zauzhazhyts - not abmyarkovaetstsa extremely important problem (it seems that menavіta yana “motivated” Dubaevts (and not only Iago) on the written word of the article).

Prychyna ў offensive - agulnavydom, that the scandal with the adventure - facts ab uncollected, falsified signatures "Govpravda" and how other "lidars" plow all these dzeyachov in your sheragovaya apa zitsyi.

It is true that Z. Paznyak ab dzeynastsi pseudapazitsynykh struktury".

What can I say? Everything is correct. The way it is.

We must pay tribute to Poznyak. Despite all his recent miscalculations, he is the only significant figure who does not compromise on principles and does not wag his tail in front of those who call the tune.

If it nervous system did not resonate with the Ukrainian events, which in no way correspond to his own ideas about good and evil, he could become not an out-of-town leader of alternative thinking, but a real Belarusian politician who has no need to fight the windmills of communism - they are already in the past.

In conclusion, I wanted to write something smart, but one expression from Dubovets brought a smile and put me off the desire to pound water in a mortar:

“...all the trees in the oak tree are rosy, only the pine needles are hellishly timid. And the very sign is like this - an oak, oaks for other oaks - not the same as in nature.”

It seems that Dubovets told the truth. But, as you know, in every process there are exceptions.

Today “Oakest for other oaks” still there.

A selection of scary comics in the setting of rural America.

Fans of the horror genre are familiar firsthand with the oppressive atmosphere of American forests. You don’t have to look far for examples: you can recall both classics like Sam Raimi’s The Evil Dead and the experimental The Cabin in the Woods, directed by Drew Goddard.

However, not only filmmakers, but also many comic book authors turned to this setting, with key works which this selection will introduce you to. You can find more material about comics in my

Hillbilly by Eric Powell

Eric Powell - creator of the legendary comic The Goon. Having completed the epic saga, the author changed course to a more local stories in his new fantasy universe. A stern-looking protagonist with mysterious origin, who travels the world and encounters evil spirits from myths and legends. Doesn't remind you of anything? Analogies with Hellboy suggest themselves, but already in the first issue it becomes obvious that the comics are different both in spirit and in execution.

During the creation of The Goon, Powell practiced his craft of writing and drawing, reaching a high level in Hillbilly. Drawing inspiration from Appalachian folklore, the author uses a distinctive mountain accent in the dialogue to add authenticity to the work.

In this comic he moved away from the long format plot novel with many characters and twisting plots, focusing on short but captivating plots. Main character loves listening, telling and discussing stories. At the same time, as in life, stories change from storyteller to storyteller, inviting the reader to decide for himself: what is true and what is fiction.

To convey the mood, Powell actively works with colors: the main part of the world is made in muted yellow-brown shades, with sharp pencil lines, like a rough sketch in a notebook. At the same time, the author has an impressive set of visual styles, without turning the comic into a dull yellow mess. Powell enjoys working with a mythological bestiary: here you have many-faced wolves, and treacherous witches, familiar trolls and creatures typical of Appalachia that you have probably never heard of before.

Overall, a great story that combines a unique fantasy universe with horror elements and great dialogues about repentance, love spells and stupid people.

Harrow County by Cullen Bunn & Tyler Crook

A teenage and sometimes rather naive comic book that talks, among other things, about the problems of growing up. The story of Harrow County is dedicated to the conflict between a girl and the villagers, who are confident that she is the next incarnation of a powerful witch who was once killed. Trying to prove my innocence, main character discovers that he really has a connection with supernatural beings.

After this, the plot of the work begins to develop rapidly, and many minor characters. Cullen Bunn, far from being the most talented screenwriter, performs surprisingly well in Harrow County. He is especially successful at intensifying the horror, which he creates using a simple formula: several pages are spent leading up to the spread, where the next monster appears in all its disgusting ugliness. A kind of analogue of jump scares from movies.

But the star of the comic is artist Tyler Crook, who is known for his work on B.P.R.D. The ability and love to draw monsters and “body horror” is what sets Harrow County authors apart from the rest. In addition to the horde of evil spirits, which range from skinless little boys to giant demons, the comic is replete with nauseating moments, such as people with disfigured faces, rotten food in which maggots swarm, and, of course, large quantity blood.

Freaks In The Heartland by Steve Niles & Greg Ruth

A slow, moving story about the importance and, at the same time, depravity of family ties, about the deeply wounded and wretched - all this through the prism of a closed community.

Greg Ruth, a comic book artist known among other things for his illustrations based on Twin Peaks, did a masterful job of conveying the viscous atmosphere of the work. Autumn, dirty tones are ideal for depicting rural areas: dilapidated barns, endless fields and withered trees. With every frame you plunge into the abyss of hopelessness, saturated with hatred and fear.

Even though the general outline of the universe is unsaid and many elements remain behind the scenes, ignoring the reader’s questions, the comic focuses on the two-faced nature family ties. The authors are more interested in talking about the ambiguous moral essence of ugliness, where the absence of physical flaws does not make you a good person.

Moonshine by Brian Azarello & Eduardo Risso

Another work from the famous duo responsible for the crime comic 100 Bullets. Without parting with the gangsters, the authors add a pinch of horror and supernatural monsters to their new creation.

Moonshine will tell you a lot with its ambiguous name: having coveted excellent moonshine, polished gentlemen in jackets and with Thompson machine guns send their man to West Virginia in order to conclude a deal and arrange the supply of alcohol. As a result, the hero encounters a family clan of proud werewolves who do not need partners.

By setting the story in forests and swamps, Azzarello gives Risso complete carte blanche, emphasizing his irresistible love of contrast. Having gotten rid of contours, the artist enthusiastically depicts shadows that replace objects, buildings and even entire backgrounds. Whether it’s a hidden werewolf in the thicket of a forest, a character’s languid gaze, or a half-empty room, the artist invariably lines the frame with twilight.

In addition to the amazing art and monsters with bloody mouths, the comic contains reflections on the theme of loss - one of the main leitmotifs of Brian Azzarello. The main character who lost loved one, with every step deep into the wild lands he risks losing himself, forever lost in the madness of moonlight.

Hellboy The Crooked Man by Mike Mignola & Richard Corben

Traveling through 1950s Virginia, a cult demon witnesses otherworldly interference and teams up with a local redneck as they both try to figure out what's going on here.

It is not Mike Mignola himself who is responsible for the drawing, but the legendary author and artist Richard Corben, who specializes in the horror genre and is known for his characteristic style, expressed in the grotesque masculinity of the characters. This time, instead of muscular monsters, Corben surrounds readers with endless tracts of coniferous forests. The stunning beauty of the original landscape in Richard's rough, sloppy drawing captivates and points to sinister secrets hidden in the depths of untouched nature.

While the art most effectively conveys the aesthetic of one-story America, with all its dilapidated chapels in the wilderness and wooden shacks inhabited by witches, the story focuses on the motives of return: returning home, to origins, family reunion. Hellboy serves as a silent observer here, often remaining in the shadows or on the edge of the frame, giving way to the cursed little people who want to find peace in this dead land.

In general, comics are a very difficult medium for horror: the specificity of the image of frames and the absence of sounds pushes Mignola and Corben not to use standard “boo” moments and regular depiction of challenging elements on the pages of the comic, but to consistently build an oppressive atmosphere.

Gradually, page after page, the heroes plunge into the abyss of witchcraft, losing their comrades and all hope of redemption. When it’s all over, the reader will long remember the silent expanses of the mountains, dense forests and the crooked grin of the devil.

The material has been updated by the editors

As Sherlock Holmes said, from a drop of water, a thinking and thinking person can logically draw conclusions about the existence of the Black Sea or Niagara Falls, even if he has never seen either one in his life. It's about that any action has results in the future; if there is a cause, then there is a consequence.

This is the meaning of the proverb “they cut down the forest and the chips fly.” True, its meaning shows that the consequence is not always positive.

What do flying chips mean?

Imagine that a forest is being felled. Trees fall one after another, and in the process dust rises and chips of damaged wood fly in all directions. It’s good if they don’t hit anyone, but such a sliver can injure and blind. When they say “they cut down the forest, the chips fly,” the meaning is this: in order to achieve a good and desired result, you may have to suffer a little damage from the chips. But it is not comparable to the more global and colossal goal - the resulting wood. In the Ukrainian language there is a proverb with a similar meaning. It sounds like this: “Where there is flour, there is also dust,” which can be translated as “where there is flour, there is always dust.”

Another meaning of this proverb, more economic, is that flying chips are small but obligatory production costs.

There would be no happiness, but misfortune would help

The meaning of the proverbs “they cut down the forest - the chips fly” and “if there was no happiness, but misfortune helped” are opposite in meaning, although they are often confused. So, in the first case, it means that on the way to achieving a good, and most importantly, desired result, you may have to endure negative consequences. In the second case, it means that sometimes trouble can lead to good, unpredictable and unexpected consequences. Sometimes people get confused about the meaning of these two sayings and use them incorrectly.

Another meaning of the proverb “when the forest is cut down, the chips fly”

Eat interesting assumption that this proverb refers to larger concepts, such as entire nations. How to understand “the forest is cut down and the chips fly” in this case? Thus, a forest can be associated with a people or nation in the process of change (felling a forest). Sometimes these changes are quite positive and bring something good, but any changes will cause innocent victims. In this case, chips are understood as human broken destinies.

Synonymous saying about causation

The meaning of the proverbs “if they cut down a forest, the chips fly” and “if you don’t break eggs, you can’t fry eggs” are close in meaning. In both cases, it is implied that on the path to a big and good goal one cannot do without concessions and possible inconveniences. But if in a conversation about cutting down forest wood chips are an optional and not very significant factor, then in the case of scrambled eggs it means that without sacrifices for the good ( broken eggs) not enough.

Many people mistakenly consider the meaning of the proverbs “they cut down the forest - the chips fly” and “the further into the forest - the more firewood” is the same, because in both the first and second cases we are talking about the forest and trees. But it is not so. The second proverb implies that any business in the process of execution can bring more and more surprises, and the further it goes, the more troubles you can encounter.

To summarize

The Russian language is rich not only in words, but also in phraseological units, catchphrases, sayings and proverbs. Using them, you enrich your speech, make it even more colorful and rich, and also show your intellectual level with dignity. At the same time, it is important to use the right phrases to the point, otherwise you will goof off instead of showing off your intelligence. Now, knowing the correct meaning of the proverbs “if they cut down a forest, the chips fly,” “without breaking eggs, you can’t fry an egg,” “the further into the forest, the more firewood,” you can use them appropriately.

The figurative meaning of the proverb further into the forest - more firewood

Andrey Martin

The figurative meaning has nothing to do with the FOREST... You can give a synonymous chain FOREST - WILD - PROBLEMS (OBJECTIVES). FIREWOOD - SOLVING A PROBLEM That is, the meaning becomes this: the more you solve problems, study any issue, the more new problems appear that require new solutions... I like Murphy’s Law on this topic “Solving one task (problem) entails the emergence of many other unsolved problems (problems)”... I am a programmer, so this law or saying can be applied to me approximately in the sense of “Identifying one error in program entails an increase in the number of undetected errors :-)" this saying can be applied everywhere

What does it mean - the further into the forest, the more firewood?)))

Landscape

The further you get into problems, the larger and larger they become
The further you delve into the situation, the more unexpected moments arise. I reason based on the fact that there is an expression “to make a mess”, which is probably older than this saying.

Sergey Kropachev

and as the saying goes, when you enter the forest, it’s not difficult to walk, but the further you go, the more difficult it is, the thickets. But in life, when you stir up some kind of business, at first it seems like nothing, but then it turns out that there are a lot of problems, and the further you go, the more.

Natalia Kondratskaya

It’s about the same as “if you don’t know the ford, don’t get into the water” or “the less you know, you’ll sleep better and live longer.” This is when you take on something, and then you regret that you took it on, because you didn’t calculate the strengths and pitfalls (especially if tried to help someone and failed, but caused harm).

Where does the proverb come from - the further into the forest the more firewood there is?

⊰ ðEȴmƴ ⊱

The further into the forest, the more firewood.
THE FURTHER INTO THE FOREST, THE BIGGER THE DROVES. The more you delve into some... business, you delve into problems, the more surprises or difficulties arise that are not easy to overcome. The proverb is actually Russian, recorded from the 17th-18th centuries. : Farther into the forest, more firewood; The further into the forest there is more firewood. In the Polish language, apparently, there is a Russianism: Im dale/ wlas, tym wiecejdrzew. ffl My wife is hysterical. The daughter declares that she is unable to live with such violent parents and gets dressed to leave home. The further into the forest, the more firewood. It ends with the important guest finding a doctor on stage applying lead lotions to her husband’s head. (A. Chekhov. Vaudeville). Will there be an end, will the time come when with a light heart you can say to yourself that you have done everything you wanted, achieved what you wanted? Hardly. The further into the forest, the more firewood. (V. Tendryakov. Behind the running day). * The apotheosis of this “process” was the exit from common Union writers of the Bondarevsky SP of the RSFSR; then followed the convening of an emergency congress of the same Bondarev wing of the RSFSR SP. His opponents, their meetings and plenums Vl. Gusev dubbed it the “Parade of Informers.” Ee-zh! If your shoulder gets itchy, swing your arm... Further into the forest there is more firewood: Bondarev’s secretariat is decisively closing the Union of Writers of the USSR, since it “ceased to exist.”, . Simple and clear. (B. Mozhaev. Passion-faces. Literary newspaper. 09.25.91). After this [accrual], the salary leaves the region to your hometown. The further into the forest, the slower the money “makes its way”. (Arguments and Facts, No. 45. 1996). Wed. : Further into the sea - more grief; Further into the argument - more words.

How to write a fairy tale based on the proverb “The further into the forest, the more firewood”?

How to write a fairy tale based on the proverb “The further into the forest, the more firewood” for 2nd grade?

Galina Vasilna

There lived in the same village a woman and her two sons. The children were not big, but they could already help at home. One day my mother left for work, and before leaving she asked her sons to go to the forest and bring some brushwood:

My dear sons, don’t go too far into the forest, don’t take too much brushwood. So that you yourself don’t get too tired and don’t strain your arms.

Mom left, and the sons dressed warmly, took a sled and rope and went into the forest. They came in from the edge, looked around, and it seemed to them that there wasn’t enough brushwood here. We went further into the forest. It’s true, the further into the forest they went, the more firewood they found. Apparently others cut down from the edge, but not everyone went into the thicket. The guys chopped wood and loaded it onto the sled. We tried, we wanted to please my mother and prepare more firewood. Only when we set off on the return journey did the heavily loaded sleigh either fall into the snow, then cling to the bushes, or fall on its side.

It’s hard to drag, the guys are tired, and it’s still very far from home. After all, they went to the forest light, and back with a loaded sled.

The guys see that it’s already getting dark, but they can’t get out of the forest. Then they removed half the wood from the sled, tied it up again and hurried home. They walk along the road and think: after all, mother told them not to go too far. After all, even along the edge of the forest it was possible to collect the firewood that would fit on their sleds. You don't always have to go far for something you can't carry.